Teachers’ Expectations of Student Mathematics Achievement, and Student Mathematics Self-Efficacy in Aotearoa New Zealand Intermediate Schools: Do Teacher and Student Gender Make a Difference?

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2023-12-08 DOI:10.1007/s40841-023-00303-5
Penelope W. St J. Watson, Christine M. Rubie-Davies
{"title":"Teachers’ Expectations of Student Mathematics Achievement, and Student Mathematics Self-Efficacy in Aotearoa New Zealand Intermediate Schools: Do Teacher and Student Gender Make a Difference?","authors":"Penelope W. St J. Watson, Christine M. Rubie-Davies","doi":"10.1007/s40841-023-00303-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Student self-beliefs can shape their self-efficacy and influence achievement. Further, student self-beliefs can be influenced by teachers’ own beliefs and expectations for their students. Yet, the relations between teacher expectations, teacher and student gender, student mathematics achievement outcomes and self-efficacy have been little explored. Aotearoa New Zealand intermediate school students (<i>n</i> = 1314) and their teachers (<i>n</i> = 73) from three urban schools ranging in ethnicity and socioeconomic status, were surveyed at the beginning and end of one school year regarding their beliefs about and expectations of mathematics achievement, and student mathematics achievement was measured. ANOVAs determined that all teachers held greater expectations of their female as compared to male students’ mathematics achievement. No differences in self-efficacy to meet mathematics expectations or in self-efficacy to achieve in mathematics were demonstrated at the beginning of the year by student gender. However, boys exceeded girls in these regards by the years’ end. When student self-efficacy to meet expectations in mathematics was examined by teacher gender, male students demonstrated greater levels than female students at both year points in female teachers’ classes, suggesting the influence of teacher gender on student beliefs. Greater self-efficacy in mathematics organisation was evidenced for female students in both male and female teachers’ classes. Interestingly, no statistically significant difference in student mathematics achievement was noted by student gender either between or within the classes of male and female teachers. Student mathematics self-beliefs and achievement outcomes, their association with teacher and student gender, and implications for student futures are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":44884,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-023-00303-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Student self-beliefs can shape their self-efficacy and influence achievement. Further, student self-beliefs can be influenced by teachers’ own beliefs and expectations for their students. Yet, the relations between teacher expectations, teacher and student gender, student mathematics achievement outcomes and self-efficacy have been little explored. Aotearoa New Zealand intermediate school students (n = 1314) and their teachers (n = 73) from three urban schools ranging in ethnicity and socioeconomic status, were surveyed at the beginning and end of one school year regarding their beliefs about and expectations of mathematics achievement, and student mathematics achievement was measured. ANOVAs determined that all teachers held greater expectations of their female as compared to male students’ mathematics achievement. No differences in self-efficacy to meet mathematics expectations or in self-efficacy to achieve in mathematics were demonstrated at the beginning of the year by student gender. However, boys exceeded girls in these regards by the years’ end. When student self-efficacy to meet expectations in mathematics was examined by teacher gender, male students demonstrated greater levels than female students at both year points in female teachers’ classes, suggesting the influence of teacher gender on student beliefs. Greater self-efficacy in mathematics organisation was evidenced for female students in both male and female teachers’ classes. Interestingly, no statistically significant difference in student mathematics achievement was noted by student gender either between or within the classes of male and female teachers. Student mathematics self-beliefs and achievement outcomes, their association with teacher and student gender, and implications for student futures are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰奥特亚罗瓦中级学校教师对学生数学成绩的期望和学生的数学自我效能感:教师和学生的性别是否会产生影响?
学生的自我信念可以形成他们的自我效能感,并影响成绩。此外,学生的自我信念也会受到教师自身信念和对学生期望的影响。然而,对于教师的期望、教师和学生的性别、学生的数学成绩和自我效能感之间的关系却鲜有探讨。我们在一个学年的开始和结束时,对来自三所不同种族和社会经济地位的城市学校的新西兰奥特亚罗瓦中学生(n = 1314)和他们的教师(n = 73)进行了调查,了解他们对数学成绩的信念和期望,并对学生的数学成绩进行了测量。方差分析结果表明,与男生相比,所有教师都对女生的数学成绩抱有更高的期望。在学年开始时,不同性别的学生在达到数学期望的自我效能感和取得数学成绩的自我效能感方面没有差异。然而,到了学年结束时,男生在这些方面都超过了女生。当按教师性别考察学生在数学学习中达到期望的自我效能感时,在女教师所教班级的两个年级,男生的自我效能感均高于女生,这表明教师性别对学生信念的影响。在男教师和女教师的班级中,女学生在数学学习中的自我效能感都更高。有趣的是,无论是在男教师班级还是在女教师班级中,学生的数学成绩都没有因性别而产生显著的统计学差异。本文讨论了学生的数学自信心和数学成绩、它们与教师和学生性别的关系,以及对学生未来的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL STUDIES EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: New Zealand Journal of Education Studies (NZJES) is the journal of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education. Since 1966, NZJES has published research of relevance to both the Aotearoa New Zealand and international education communities. NZJES publishes original research and scholarly writing that is insightful and thought provoking. NZJES seeks submissions of empirical (qualitative and quantitative) and non-empirical articles, including those that are methodologically or theoretically innovative, as well as scholarly essays and book reviews. The journal is multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary in approach, and committed to the principles and practice of biculturalism. In accordance with that commitment, NZJES welcomes submissions in either Maori or English, or the inclusion of the paper abstract in both English and Maori. NZJES also welcomes international submissions that shed light on matters of interest to its readership and that include reference to Aotearoa New Zealand authors and/or contexts. The journal also welcomes proposals for Special Themed Sections, which are groups of related papers curated by guest editors.NZJES is indexed in Scopus and ERIC. All articles have undergone rigorous double blind peer review by at least two expert reviewers, who are asked to adhere to the ‘Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers’ published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
On the Democratisation and Professionalisation of Higher Education Teaching Revisiting Teacher-Family Partnerships: A Critical Policy Analysis of Pacific Education Policy 2009–2030 The Idea of a “Flawed Treaty” and its Influence on Students’ Perceptions of the New Zealand Wars Teaching the Linguistically Diverse Learner in Aotearoa New Zealand. Edited by Rosemary Erlam (2024) Perspectives of Secondary School Mathematics Teachers on the Implications of Streaming
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1