VISUALIZING CROSS-LINGUISTIC READING BRAINS: UNIVERSALITY AND INTERACTIVE SPECIFICITIES

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Chinese Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-12-08 DOI:10.1353/jcl.2017.a915059
Jun Ren Lee, Wen-Jui Kuo, Rose Ru-Whui Lee, Ovid J. L. Tzeng
{"title":"VISUALIZING CROSS-LINGUISTIC READING BRAINS: UNIVERSALITY AND INTERACTIVE SPECIFICITIES","authors":"Jun Ren Lee, Wen-Jui Kuo, Rose Ru-Whui Lee, Ovid J. L. Tzeng","doi":"10.1353/jcl.2017.a915059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The universality and specificity of cross-linguistic reading have always been a topic of interest to researchers. The earliest controversies started with the issue of whether speech recoding is required for reading non-alphabetic scripts, for example, Chinese and Kanji, whether it is possible to directly access the semantic meaning of a word from orthography without speech recoding, and whether reading non-alphabetic scripts relies on the right rather than the left brain. The abatement of these controversies began with a series of experiments by Ovid Tzeng and William Wang which raised the possibility of universality across different languages. To study how humans read, two kinds of operation must be considered: the human cognitive system and the structure of language. In this paper, we will take the original controversy of non-alphabetic scripts being different from alphabetic scripts in the 1970s as the starting point, and use the current research results of cognitive neuroscience to explain what kind of consensus has been reached right now. In addition, we will use tone as an important feature in the study of Chinese reading, and describe the current research results on tone to highlight the special characteristics of Chinese. Finally, we will propose future research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":44675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2017.a915059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The universality and specificity of cross-linguistic reading have always been a topic of interest to researchers. The earliest controversies started with the issue of whether speech recoding is required for reading non-alphabetic scripts, for example, Chinese and Kanji, whether it is possible to directly access the semantic meaning of a word from orthography without speech recoding, and whether reading non-alphabetic scripts relies on the right rather than the left brain. The abatement of these controversies began with a series of experiments by Ovid Tzeng and William Wang which raised the possibility of universality across different languages. To study how humans read, two kinds of operation must be considered: the human cognitive system and the structure of language. In this paper, we will take the original controversy of non-alphabetic scripts being different from alphabetic scripts in the 1970s as the starting point, and use the current research results of cognitive neuroscience to explain what kind of consensus has been reached right now. In addition, we will use tone as an important feature in the study of Chinese reading, and describe the current research results on tone to highlight the special characteristics of Chinese. Finally, we will propose future research directions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨语言阅读大脑的可视化:普遍性和互动特殊性
跨语言阅读的普遍性和特殊性一直是研究人员感兴趣的话题。最早的争议始于阅读非字母文字(如汉语和汉字)是否需要语音重编码,是否可以不通过语音重编码直接从正字法获取单词的语义,以及阅读非字母文字是否依赖右脑而非左脑。这些争议的缓和始于曾奥维德和王威廉的一系列实验,这些实验提出了不同语言之间普遍性的可能性。要研究人类如何阅读,必须考虑两种操作:人类的认知系统和语言结构。本文将以 20 世纪 70 年代关于非字母文字不同于字母文字的最初争论为出发点,用当前认知神经科学的研究成果来解释目前达成了怎样的共识。此外,我们还将把声调作为中文阅读研究中的一个重要特征,并介绍目前关于声调的研究成果,以突出中文的特殊性。最后,我们将提出未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JCL) is an academic journal, which comprises research content from both general linguistics and Chinese linguistics. It is edited by a distinguished editorial board of international expertise. There are two publications: Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JCL) and Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series (JCLMS).
期刊最新文献
The origin of the adjectival and adverbial mulaolao in Wu Chinese From analogies to negativity: Pragmatic functions and stance expression of subjective counterfactual ruguo sentence. (In Chinese) Word Frequency Modulates the Selection of Semantic Access Pathways of Spoken Words in the Second Language The Resumptive View of the Cantonese Dummy keoi5 Revisited Acoustic Patterns in Hong Kong Cantonese Hesitation Markers: Vowel Quality and Omnisyllabic Tone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1