Identification of Source Faults of Large Earthquakes in the Turkey-Syria Border Region Between 1000 CE and the Present, and Their Relevance for the 2023 Mw 7.8 Pazarcık Earthquake

IF 3.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Tectonics Pub Date : 2023-12-09 DOI:10.1029/2023tc007890
S. Carena, A. M. Friedrich, A. Verdecchia, B. Kahle, S. Rieger, S. Kübler
{"title":"Identification of Source Faults of Large Earthquakes in the Turkey-Syria Border Region Between 1000 CE and the Present, and Their Relevance for the 2023 Mw 7.8 Pazarcık Earthquake","authors":"S. Carena, A. M. Friedrich, A. Verdecchia, B. Kahle, S. Rieger, S. Kübler","doi":"10.1029/2023tc007890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 6 February 2023, <i>M</i><sub><i>w</i></sub> 7.8 Pazarcık earthquake in the Turkey-Syria border region raises the question of whether such a large earthquake could have been foreseen, as well as what is the maximum possible magnitude (<i>M</i><sub>max</sub>) of earthquakes on the East Anatolian Fault (EAF) system and on continental transform faults in general. To answer such questions, knowledge of past earthquakes and of their causative faults is necessary. Here, we integrate data from historical seismology, paleoseismology, archeoseismology, and remote sensing to identify the likely source faults of fourteen <i>M</i><sub><i>w</i></sub> ≥ 7 earthquakes between 1000 CE and the present in the region. We find that the 2023 Pazarcık earthquake could have been foreseen in terms of location (the EAF) and timing (an earthquake along this fault was if anything overdue), but not magnitude. We hypothesize that the maximum earthquake magnitude for the EAF is in fact 8.2, that is, a single end-to-end rupture of the entire fault, and that the 2023 Pazarcık earthquake did not reach <i>M</i><sub>max</sub> by a fortuitous combination of circumstances. We conclude that such unusually large events are hard to model in terms of recurrence intervals, and that seismic hazard assessment along continental transforms cannot be done on individual fault systems but must include neighboring systems as well, because they are not kinematically independent at any time scale.","PeriodicalId":22351,"journal":{"name":"Tectonics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tectonics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023tc007890","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 6 February 2023, Mw 7.8 Pazarcık earthquake in the Turkey-Syria border region raises the question of whether such a large earthquake could have been foreseen, as well as what is the maximum possible magnitude (Mmax) of earthquakes on the East Anatolian Fault (EAF) system and on continental transform faults in general. To answer such questions, knowledge of past earthquakes and of their causative faults is necessary. Here, we integrate data from historical seismology, paleoseismology, archeoseismology, and remote sensing to identify the likely source faults of fourteen Mw ≥ 7 earthquakes between 1000 CE and the present in the region. We find that the 2023 Pazarcık earthquake could have been foreseen in terms of location (the EAF) and timing (an earthquake along this fault was if anything overdue), but not magnitude. We hypothesize that the maximum earthquake magnitude for the EAF is in fact 8.2, that is, a single end-to-end rupture of the entire fault, and that the 2023 Pazarcık earthquake did not reach Mmax by a fortuitous combination of circumstances. We conclude that such unusually large events are hard to model in terms of recurrence intervals, and that seismic hazard assessment along continental transforms cannot be done on individual fault systems but must include neighboring systems as well, because they are not kinematically independent at any time scale.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别公元 1000 年至今土耳其-叙利亚边境地区大地震的震源断层及其与 2023 年帕扎克 7.8 级地震的相关性
2023 年 2 月 6 日在土耳其-叙利亚边境地区发生的 7.8 级 Pazarcık 地震提出了这样一个问题:这样大的地震是否可以预见,以及东安纳托利亚断层(EAF)系统和一般大陆转换断层可能发生地震的最大震级(Mmax)是多少。要回答这些问题,必须了解过去的地震及其诱发断层。在此,我们整合了历史地震学、古地震学、考古地震学和遥感数据,确定了该地区从公元 1000 年至今 14 次 Mw ≥ 7 地震的可能震源断层。我们发现,2023 年帕扎克地震在位置(EAF)和时间(沿该断层发生地震的时间可能已经过期)方面是可以预见的,但震级却无法预见。我们假设,EAF 的最大震级实际上是 8.2 级,即整个断层的一次端对端断裂,而 2023 年的 Pazarcık 地震并非由于偶然的情况组合而达到最大震级。我们的结论是,这种异常大的事件难以用重现间隔来建模,沿大陆转换的地震灾害评估不能针对单个断层系统,还必须包括邻近的系统,因为它们在任何时间尺度上都不是运动学独立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tectonics
Tectonics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Tectonics (TECT) presents original scientific contributions that describe and explain the evolution, structure, and deformation of Earth¹s lithosphere. Contributions are welcome from any relevant area of research, including field, laboratory, petrological, geochemical, geochronological, geophysical, remote-sensing, and modeling studies. Multidisciplinary studies are particularly encouraged. Tectonics welcomes studies across the range of geologic time.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of DNA Methylation (5-mC) in Detecting Severity of Occupational Lead Exposure. One Billion Years of Stability in the North American Midcontinent Following Two-Stage Grenvillian Structural Inversion Relating Quartz Crystallographic Preferred Orientation Intensity to Finite Strain Magnitude in the Northern Snake Range Metamorphic Core Complex, Nevada: A New Tool for Characterizing Strain Patterns in Ductilely Sheared Rocks Lancang Fault Assists Block Extrusion in Southeastern Tibet During Early-Middle Miocene Surface Rupture of the 2008 Mw 6.6 Nura Earthquake: Triggered Flexural-Slip Faulting in the Pamir-Tien Shan Collision Zone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1