The Effect of a Compression Bandage on Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Body Composition Scores

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Journal of Clinical Densitometry Pub Date : 2023-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101461
Yamileth Chacón-Araya , Elizabeth Carpio-Rivera , Andrea Quirós-Quirós , José Moncada-Jiménez
{"title":"The Effect of a Compression Bandage on Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Body Composition Scores","authors":"Yamileth Chacón-Araya ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Carpio-Rivera ,&nbsp;Andrea Quirós-Quirós ,&nbsp;José Moncada-Jiménez","doi":"10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Background</em>: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures are affected by the noise produced by external factors such as textile compression found in loose clothing. The study aimed to determine the effect of a compression bandage (CB) on body composition (BC) assessed by DXA.</p><p><em>Methods</em><span>: Sixty volunteers (age=21.4±4.7yr.) underwent full-body DXA scans on a control (CTRL) condition and after wearing a 30-mmHg CB on the trunk, legs, and arms. ANOVA (2 genders by 2 experimental conditions) determined mean interactions in BC variables tissue body fat% (BF%), region body fat% (RBF%), body tissue (BT), fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), bone mineral content (BMC), and total mass (TM). Absolute reliability in BC scores was studied by the typical error of the measurement (TEM), the coefficient of variability (CV), and Bland-Altman plots.</span></p><p><em>Results</em>: ANOVA interactions were found on tissue total BF% (p=0.049), RBF% (p=0.048), android lean mass (p=0.004), and android total mass (p=0.019). The CV was small for tissue BF% (2.61±0.93%, CI95%=0.79, 4.43%), RBF% (2.66±1.78%, CI95%=-0.83, 6.15%), BT (4.82±2.19%, CI95%=0.54, 9.10kg), FM (4.17±2.25%, CI95%=-0.24, 8.58kg), LM (3.25±2.44%, CI95%=-1.53, 8.04kg), BMC (4.81±2.96%, CI95%=-0.99, 10.62kg), and TM (2.84±2.80%, CI95%=-2.65, 8.33kg). Bland-Altman plots showed random error for BF%, LM, and BMC. A bias of 0.5% was observed on BF% in males.</p><p><em>Conclusion</em>: A CB worn during a full-body DXA scan elicited similar BC scores than not wearing it. The variation in scores was &lt;10% for most BC variables, and a trivial bias of 0.5% in BF% was detected in male scores.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","volume":"27 1","pages":"Article 101461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Densitometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094695023001117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures are affected by the noise produced by external factors such as textile compression found in loose clothing. The study aimed to determine the effect of a compression bandage (CB) on body composition (BC) assessed by DXA.

Methods: Sixty volunteers (age=21.4±4.7yr.) underwent full-body DXA scans on a control (CTRL) condition and after wearing a 30-mmHg CB on the trunk, legs, and arms. ANOVA (2 genders by 2 experimental conditions) determined mean interactions in BC variables tissue body fat% (BF%), region body fat% (RBF%), body tissue (BT), fat mass (FM), lean mass (LM), bone mineral content (BMC), and total mass (TM). Absolute reliability in BC scores was studied by the typical error of the measurement (TEM), the coefficient of variability (CV), and Bland-Altman plots.

Results: ANOVA interactions were found on tissue total BF% (p=0.049), RBF% (p=0.048), android lean mass (p=0.004), and android total mass (p=0.019). The CV was small for tissue BF% (2.61±0.93%, CI95%=0.79, 4.43%), RBF% (2.66±1.78%, CI95%=-0.83, 6.15%), BT (4.82±2.19%, CI95%=0.54, 9.10kg), FM (4.17±2.25%, CI95%=-0.24, 8.58kg), LM (3.25±2.44%, CI95%=-1.53, 8.04kg), BMC (4.81±2.96%, CI95%=-0.99, 10.62kg), and TM (2.84±2.80%, CI95%=-2.65, 8.33kg). Bland-Altman plots showed random error for BF%, LM, and BMC. A bias of 0.5% was observed on BF% in males.

Conclusion: A CB worn during a full-body DXA scan elicited similar BC scores than not wearing it. The variation in scores was <10% for most BC variables, and a trivial bias of 0.5% in BF% was detected in male scores.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加压绷带对双能 X 射线吸收计身体成分评分的影响
背景双能 X 射线吸收测定法(DXA)的测量会受到外部因素(如宽松衣物中的织物压缩)产生的噪音的影响。该研究旨在确定压缩绷带(CB)对通过 DXA 评估的身体成分(BC)的影响。方法60 名志愿者(年龄=21.4±4.7 岁)在对照(CTRL)条件下以及在躯干、腿部和手臂佩戴 30 mmHg CB 后接受了全身 DXA 扫描。方差分析(2 种实验条件下的 2 种性别)确定了 BC 变量组织体脂率 (BF%)、区域体脂率 (RBF%)、身体组织 (BT)、脂肪量 (FM)、瘦肉量 (LM)、骨矿物质含量 (BMC) 和总质量 (TM) 的平均交互作用。通过典型测量误差(TEM)、变异系数(CV)和Bland-Altman图研究了BC评分的绝对可靠性。结果发现,组织总BF%(P=0.049)、RBF%(P=0.048)、android瘦体重(P=0.004)和android总质量(P=0.019)存在ANOVA交互作用。组织 BF%(2.61±0.93%,CI95%=0.79,4.43%)、RBF%(2.66±1.78%,CI95%=-0.83,6.15%)、BT(4.82±2.19%,CI95%=0.54,9.10kg)、FM(4.17±2.25%,CI95%=-0.24,8.58kg)、LM(3.25±2.44%,CI95%=-1.53,8.04kg)、BMC(4.81±2.96%,CI95%=-0.99,10.62kg)和 TM(2.84±2.80%,CI95%=-2.65,8.33kg)。Bland-Altman图显示了BF%、LM和BMC的随机误差。结论 在全身 DXA 扫描期间佩戴 CB 与不佩戴 CB 相比,BC 得分相似。大多数 BC 变量的评分差异为 10%,在男性评分中发现 BF% 存在 0.5% 的微小偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Densitometry
Journal of Clinical Densitometry 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal is committed to serving ISCD''s mission - the education of heterogenous physician specialties and technologists who are involved in the clinical assessment of skeletal health. The focus of JCD is bone mass measurement, including epidemiology of bone mass, how drugs and diseases alter bone mass, new techniques and quality assurance in bone mass imaging technologies, and bone mass health/economics. Combining high quality research and review articles with sound, practice-oriented advice, JCD meets the diverse diagnostic and management needs of radiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, rheumatologists, gynecologists, family physicians, internists, and technologists whose patients require diagnostic clinical densitometry for therapeutic management.
期刊最新文献
Predicting bone mineral content from smartphone digital anthropometrics: evaluation of an existing application and the development of new prediction models Moving towards an equitable future: Rethinking the use of race in pediatric densitometry Comparison of the Effect of Selective Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors on Bone Mineral Density with Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Healthy Controls Opportunistic Screening for Low Bone Mineral Density in Routine Computed Tomography Scans: A Brazilian Validation Study Canadian adult reference data for body composition, trabecular bone score and advanced hip analysis using DXA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1