Impact of family history of cancer on colorectal cancer screening: a propensity score-matched analysis from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)

Maxwell Akonde, Eric Mishio Bawa, Ottovon Bismark Dakurah, Rajat Das Gupta
{"title":"Impact of family history of cancer on colorectal cancer screening: a propensity score-matched analysis from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS)","authors":"Maxwell Akonde, Eric Mishio Bawa, Ottovon Bismark Dakurah, Rajat Das Gupta","doi":"10.1186/s43046-023-00201-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early detection of colon cancer leads to better survival outcomes. This can be achieved through colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. People with a family history of cancer (FHC) have increased risk of developing CRC. Increasing screening in this group will reduce CRC mortality. This study evaluated CRC screening in people with FHC. The study used data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5, cycle 3. This is an annual cross-sectional survey with a nationally representative sample of American adults. The objective was to study the association between FHC and performing CRC screening. Propensity score matching was used to create a matched population with variables that constituted beliefs in cancer from the survey. Replication procedure, which is based on repeated sampling and allows for accurate computation of standard errors, was used for calculating statistical tests. Multivariable models were fitted in the matched population to assess the association between FHC and performing CRC screening. People with FHC were 14% (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.81–1.60) more likely to perform CRC screening than those without FHC, even though not statistically significant. Age in years (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.12–5.27) had increased likelihood of performing CRC screening, while other races such as American Indians/Alaskan Natives (except African Americans) compared to Caucasians (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29–0.84) had significantly decreased likelihood of performing CRC screening. FHC was not significantly associated with having a colorectal cancer screening test. Public health advocacy should be directed towards increasing awareness of CRC screening among people with FHC.","PeriodicalId":17301,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43046-023-00201-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early detection of colon cancer leads to better survival outcomes. This can be achieved through colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. People with a family history of cancer (FHC) have increased risk of developing CRC. Increasing screening in this group will reduce CRC mortality. This study evaluated CRC screening in people with FHC. The study used data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 5, cycle 3. This is an annual cross-sectional survey with a nationally representative sample of American adults. The objective was to study the association between FHC and performing CRC screening. Propensity score matching was used to create a matched population with variables that constituted beliefs in cancer from the survey. Replication procedure, which is based on repeated sampling and allows for accurate computation of standard errors, was used for calculating statistical tests. Multivariable models were fitted in the matched population to assess the association between FHC and performing CRC screening. People with FHC were 14% (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.81–1.60) more likely to perform CRC screening than those without FHC, even though not statistically significant. Age in years (OR = 1.14; 95% CI: 1.12–5.27) had increased likelihood of performing CRC screening, while other races such as American Indians/Alaskan Natives (except African Americans) compared to Caucasians (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29–0.84) had significantly decreased likelihood of performing CRC screening. FHC was not significantly associated with having a colorectal cancer screening test. Public health advocacy should be directed towards increasing awareness of CRC screening among people with FHC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症家族史对大肠癌筛查的影响:全国健康信息趋势调查(HINTS)的倾向得分匹配分析
早期发现结肠癌可提高生存率。这可以通过结肠直肠癌(CRC)筛查来实现。有癌症家族史(FHC)的人患 CRC 的风险更高。加强对这一人群的筛查将降低 CRC 的死亡率。这项研究评估了对有 FHC 的人群进行 CRC 筛查的情况。该研究使用了第 5 次全国健康信息趋势调查(HINTS)第 3 周期的数据。这是一项具有全国代表性的美国成年人年度横断面调查。目的是研究 FHC 与进行 CRC 筛查之间的关联。使用倾向得分匹配法创建了一个与调查中构成癌症信仰的变量相匹配的人群。在计算统计检验时,使用了基于重复抽样并允许准确计算标准误差的复制程序。在匹配人群中建立了多变量模型,以评估 FHC 与进行 CRC 筛查之间的关系。与无 FHC 的人群相比,有 FHC 的人群进行 CRC 筛查的可能性要高出 14% (OR = 1.14;95% CI:0.81-1.60),尽管在统计学上并不显著。年龄(OR = 1.14;95% CI:1.12-5.27)增加了进行 CRC 筛查的可能性,而与白种人(OR = 0.49;95% CI:0.29-0.84)相比,其他种族如美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(非裔美国人除外)进行 CRC 筛查的可能性明显降低。非裔美国人与进行结直肠癌筛查的关系不大。公共卫生宣传应着眼于提高 FHC 患者对 CRC 筛查的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official publication of the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, the Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute (JENCI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal that publishes on the latest innovations in oncology and thereby, providing academics and clinicians a leading research platform. JENCI welcomes submissions pertaining to all fields of basic, applied and clinical cancer research. Main topics of interest include: local and systemic anticancer therapy (with specific interest on applied cancer research from developing countries); experimental oncology; early cancer detection; randomized trials (including negatives ones); and key emerging fields of personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, and biotechnologies.
期刊最新文献
Clinico-epidemiological and treatment factors impact on survival in Egyptian patients with head and neck sarcoma: a retrospective case-series analysis. Assessment of podocyte detachment as a pivotal step in the development of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Genomic strategies for drug repurposing. Bladder cancer: a retrospective audit at a single radiation oncology unit of an academic hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Practical immunomodulatory landscape of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1