Enhancing economic-social sustainability through a closed-loop citrus supply chain: A life cycle cost analysis

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Resources, conservation & recycling advances Pub Date : 2023-12-07 DOI:10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200199
Emad Alzubi , Ahmed Kassem , Ani Melkonyan , Bernd Noche
{"title":"Enhancing economic-social sustainability through a closed-loop citrus supply chain: A life cycle cost analysis","authors":"Emad Alzubi ,&nbsp;Ahmed Kassem ,&nbsp;Ani Melkonyan ,&nbsp;Bernd Noche","doi":"10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The focus on food supply chain (FSC) sustainability has grown due to demand, food loss and waste, and environmental impacts. This study aims to quantify citrus life cycle costs (LCC) and determine the main drivers and their contributions. LCC was used to assess the cradle-to-grave cost of 1 kg of citrus sold to consumers at the retailer stage. A comparison was made between an existing citrus supply chain (SC) and a proposed closed-loop structure. In addition to the current citrus SC, four different cases were analyzed and evaluated: the centralized linear citrus SC, the centralized linear citrus SC with a 33 % increase in labor income, the centralized closed-loop citrus SC, and the centralized closed-loop citrus SC with a 33 % increase in labor income. The results showed significant reductions in functional unit's (FU) costs of 48 %, 38 %, 54 %, and 44 %, respectively, compared to the current citrus SC. Labor accounted for 47–62 % of the FU costs, while agriculture inputs and transportation contributed 15–28 % and 12–16 %, respectively. The study revealed that a centralized citrus closed-loop SC improves economic viability, especially when recycling citrus waste as compost for farms. Transportation currently contributes the most to FU costs (45 %), but in the closed-loop citrus SC, labor becomes the highest contributor (62 %). This cradle-to-grave citrus SC approach identifies drivers and contributions to the FU's costs, showcasing differences when integrating a circular economy. Future research may explore the impact of other byproducts on FU costs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74689,"journal":{"name":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 200199"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378923000718/pdfft?md5=9aa94986a95a1ec31ecf256efc7e53d2&pid=1-s2.0-S2667378923000718-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, conservation & recycling advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667378923000718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The focus on food supply chain (FSC) sustainability has grown due to demand, food loss and waste, and environmental impacts. This study aims to quantify citrus life cycle costs (LCC) and determine the main drivers and their contributions. LCC was used to assess the cradle-to-grave cost of 1 kg of citrus sold to consumers at the retailer stage. A comparison was made between an existing citrus supply chain (SC) and a proposed closed-loop structure. In addition to the current citrus SC, four different cases were analyzed and evaluated: the centralized linear citrus SC, the centralized linear citrus SC with a 33 % increase in labor income, the centralized closed-loop citrus SC, and the centralized closed-loop citrus SC with a 33 % increase in labor income. The results showed significant reductions in functional unit's (FU) costs of 48 %, 38 %, 54 %, and 44 %, respectively, compared to the current citrus SC. Labor accounted for 47–62 % of the FU costs, while agriculture inputs and transportation contributed 15–28 % and 12–16 %, respectively. The study revealed that a centralized citrus closed-loop SC improves economic viability, especially when recycling citrus waste as compost for farms. Transportation currently contributes the most to FU costs (45 %), but in the closed-loop citrus SC, labor becomes the highest contributor (62 %). This cradle-to-grave citrus SC approach identifies drivers and contributions to the FU's costs, showcasing differences when integrating a circular economy. Future research may explore the impact of other byproducts on FU costs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过闭环柑橘供应链增强经济-社会可持续性:生命周期成本分析
由于需求、食物损失和浪费以及环境影响,人们越来越关注食品供应链(FSC)的可持续性。本研究旨在量化柑橘的生命周期成本(LCC),并确定主要驱动因素及其贡献。生命周期成本用于评估零售商向消费者出售 1 公斤柑橘的 "从摇篮到坟墓 "成本。对现有的柑橘供应链(SC)和建议的闭环结构进行了比较。除了现有的柑橘供应链外,还分析和评估了四种不同的情况:集中式线性柑橘供应链、劳动收入增加 33% 的集中式线性柑橘供应链、集中式闭环柑橘供应链以及劳动收入增加 33% 的集中式闭环柑橘供应链。结果表明,与目前的柑橘种植模式相比,功能单元(FU)成本分别大幅降低了 48%、38%、54% 和 44%。劳动力成本占功能单位成本的 47-62%,农业投入和运输成本分别占 15-28% 和 12-16%。研究表明,集中式柑橘闭环 SC 提高了经济可行性,尤其是在回收柑橘废料作为农场堆肥时。目前,运输对燃料成本的贡献最大(45%),但在柑橘闭环供应链中,劳动力对燃料成本的贡献最大(62%)。这种 "从摇篮到坟墓 "的柑橘循环系统方法确定了燃料单位成本的驱动因素和贡献,展示了在整合循环经济时的差异。未来的研究可能会探索其他副产品对燃料电池成本的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources, conservation & recycling advances
Resources, conservation & recycling advances Environmental Science (General)
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
76 days
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and preferences of the Chinese public towards products made from recycled materials: A text mining approach Decoding sustainable consumption behavior: A systematic review of theories and models and provision of a guidance framework A two-step approach to recycling hydroponics waste nutrient solutions using fertiliser drawn forward osmosis and chemical precipitation Electrolysis and waste heat utilisation in the sustainable transition of Germany's energy system Cost factors affecting the utilisation of secondary materials in the construction sector: A systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1