Regulation, governance and organisational issues in European Railway Regulation Authorities

Andrea Tomo , Mario Pezzillo Iacono , Lorenzo Mercurio , Gianluigi Mangia , Lucio Todisco
{"title":"Regulation, governance and organisational issues in European Railway Regulation Authorities","authors":"Andrea Tomo ,&nbsp;Mario Pezzillo Iacono ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Mercurio ,&nbsp;Gianluigi Mangia ,&nbsp;Lucio Todisco","doi":"10.1016/j.jrtpm.2023.100428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Regulation, governance and organisational issues are sensitive aspects in the market of public utilities especially when these markets require and aim at initiating homogenisation processes.</p><p>The paper aims at understanding how European countries responded to supranational legislation, in terms of governance, management and organisational aspects, on the establishment of Railway Regulatory Bodies and if the steps taken by the European Union were sufficient to fulfil the aim of creating an integrated railway area.</p><p>We use a neo-institutional lens to interpret documentary sources, such as regulatory sources (Regulations, circulars and directives of the EU) and the responses given to a semi-structured questionnaire submitted to the 28 European Railway Regulatory Authorities.</p><p>The paper shows that this regulatory field faced differentiated isomorphism and that there is a growing trend towards an organisational model we characterised as ‘Generalist Agency’.</p><p>We contribute to the literature on the regulation of public utilities, showing that differentiated isomorphism may occur when coercive isomorphism by supranational legislation is mitigated by national differences, and provide policy implications on governance and regulation of the transport industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 100428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970623000604/pdfft?md5=8579d9082bc425e6cc1c1ad06e7ab17e&pid=1-s2.0-S2210970623000604-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210970623000604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regulation, governance and organisational issues are sensitive aspects in the market of public utilities especially when these markets require and aim at initiating homogenisation processes.

The paper aims at understanding how European countries responded to supranational legislation, in terms of governance, management and organisational aspects, on the establishment of Railway Regulatory Bodies and if the steps taken by the European Union were sufficient to fulfil the aim of creating an integrated railway area.

We use a neo-institutional lens to interpret documentary sources, such as regulatory sources (Regulations, circulars and directives of the EU) and the responses given to a semi-structured questionnaire submitted to the 28 European Railway Regulatory Authorities.

The paper shows that this regulatory field faced differentiated isomorphism and that there is a growing trend towards an organisational model we characterised as ‘Generalist Agency’.

We contribute to the literature on the regulation of public utilities, showing that differentiated isomorphism may occur when coercive isomorphism by supranational legislation is mitigated by national differences, and provide policy implications on governance and regulation of the transport industry.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲铁路监管机构的监管、治理和组织问题
本文旨在了解欧洲各国在治理、管理和组织方面如何应对关于建立铁路监管机构的超国家立法,以及欧盟采取的措施是否足以实现建立一体化铁路区域的目标。我们使用新制度视角来解读文献资料,如监管资料(欧盟的法规、通知和指令)以及对 28 个欧洲铁路监管机构提交的半结构化问卷的答复。论文表明,这一监管领域面临着差异化的同构现象,而且我们将其描述为 "综合机构 "的组织模式的趋势日益明显。我们为公共事业监管方面的文献做出了贡献,表明当超国家立法的强制同构性因国家差异而减弱时,可能会出现差异化同构现象,并为运输行业的治理和监管提供了政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
A MILP model to improve the robustness of a railway timetable by retiming and rerouting in a complex bottleneck area A decomposition approach to solve the individual railway crew Re-planning problem A Bi-objective model and a branch-and-price-and-cut solution method for the railroad blocking problem in hazardous material transportation Relationships between service quality and customer satisfaction in rail freight transportation: A structural equation modeling approach The evaluation of competition effect on rail fares using the difference-in-difference method through symmetric and lagged spans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1