Addressing the stagnation issue in accounting education research while incorporating mainstream publications and professional practice into the accounting curriculum

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Accounting Education Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100883
Andrea Everard , Martin Kim , Jing Lin , Kent St. Pierre
{"title":"Addressing the stagnation issue in accounting education research while incorporating mainstream publications and professional practice into the accounting curriculum","authors":"Andrea Everard ,&nbsp;Martin Kim ,&nbsp;Jing Lin ,&nbsp;Kent St. Pierre","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The accounting practice and academic research-oriented sides of the profession have had difficulties concerning the integration of their outputs. The practice side has maintained that very little of the “mainstream” research produced by academics has been of value in their day to day activities, and the research side has complained about the lack of cooperation as to the availability of data from the practice segment that is needed to conduct academic research. Add to this situation the teaching focused faculty of the profession, who contend that the research conducted in the “mainstream” is of little value to their efforts in teaching undergraduate and graduate students. Additionally, faculty in the classroom need input from the practice side to determine what information the students need to be successful after graduation. The problems were noted in 2012 by the AICPA and AAA supported Pathways Commission in their major report, with questionable efforts to date addressing the concerns. Take all of these components together and you have a view of our current “situation” in accounting.</p><p>We attempt, in this paper, to further address the previously identified stagnation in accounting education research (Rebele and St. Pierre, 2015) and, at the same time, to bridge the gaps between these different accounting groups noted by the Pathways Commission. We do this by offering a potentially unique solution to address the current accounting environment. First, we analyze the findings from a mainstream research study that both examines the practice side of the equation and directly affects our classroom coverage of topics in several of the required undergraduate and graduate courses typically found in accounting programs around the country. Second, this paper breaks from many of the current education articles in that we examine what should be taught in the classroom based on actual real - world practice issues rather than hypothetical academic approaches to the topics covered. Third, our efforts in tying together the three components - mainstream research, practice, and classroom content - will hopefully move our colleagues in a direction that benefits our students and opens new accounting education research opportunities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575123000556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The accounting practice and academic research-oriented sides of the profession have had difficulties concerning the integration of their outputs. The practice side has maintained that very little of the “mainstream” research produced by academics has been of value in their day to day activities, and the research side has complained about the lack of cooperation as to the availability of data from the practice segment that is needed to conduct academic research. Add to this situation the teaching focused faculty of the profession, who contend that the research conducted in the “mainstream” is of little value to their efforts in teaching undergraduate and graduate students. Additionally, faculty in the classroom need input from the practice side to determine what information the students need to be successful after graduation. The problems were noted in 2012 by the AICPA and AAA supported Pathways Commission in their major report, with questionable efforts to date addressing the concerns. Take all of these components together and you have a view of our current “situation” in accounting.

We attempt, in this paper, to further address the previously identified stagnation in accounting education research (Rebele and St. Pierre, 2015) and, at the same time, to bridge the gaps between these different accounting groups noted by the Pathways Commission. We do this by offering a potentially unique solution to address the current accounting environment. First, we analyze the findings from a mainstream research study that both examines the practice side of the equation and directly affects our classroom coverage of topics in several of the required undergraduate and graduate courses typically found in accounting programs around the country. Second, this paper breaks from many of the current education articles in that we examine what should be taught in the classroom based on actual real - world practice issues rather than hypothetical academic approaches to the topics covered. Third, our efforts in tying together the three components - mainstream research, practice, and classroom content - will hopefully move our colleagues in a direction that benefits our students and opens new accounting education research opportunities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在将主流出版物和专业实践纳入会计课程的同时,解决会计教育研究停滞不前的问题
会计实务界和学术研究界在整合其成果方面一直存在困难。实务界一直认为,学术界的 "主流 "研究成果对他们的日常活动价值甚微,而研究界则抱怨在获取开展学术研究所需的实务部门数据方面缺乏合作。在这种情况下,以教学为中心的专业教师认为,"主流 "研究对他们教授本科生和研究生的工作没有什么价值。此外,课堂上的教师需要实践方面的意见,以确定学生需要哪些信息才能在毕业后取得成功。2012 年,美国注册会计师协会(AICPA)和美国注册会计师协会(AAA)支持途径委员会在其主要报告中指出了这些问题,但迄今为止,解决这些问题的努力还值得商榷。我们在本文中试图进一步解决之前发现的会计教育研究停滞不前的问题(Rebele 和圣皮埃尔,2015 年),同时弥合 Pathways 委员会指出的这些不同会计团体之间的差距。为此,我们提供了一个潜在的独特解决方案,以应对当前的会计环境。首先,我们分析了一项主流研究的结果,该研究既考察了等式的实践方面,也直接影响了我们在全国各地会计专业的几门本科生和研究生必修课程中的课堂教学内容。其次,本文有别于当前的许多教育文章,我们根据现实世界中的实际问题,而不是针对所涉及主题的假设性学术方法,来研究课堂教学中应该教授的内容。第三,我们努力将主流研究、实践和课堂内容这三个部分结合起来,希望能推动我们的同行朝着有利于学生的方向发展,并开辟新的会计教育研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
期刊最新文献
How a color-based teaching method has lifted grades for first-year accounting students Workbook design and controls: A framework Examining the contribution of diverse feedback perspectives during a work-integrated learning intervention Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1