{"title":"Exploring nanoparticle emissions and size distributions during incense burning and filtration in an indoor space","authors":"Hsi-Hsien Yang, Wei-Cheng Weng, Yong-Wen Chen, Xuan-Yi Lin, Ying I. Tsai","doi":"10.1007/s11869-023-01474-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Indoor air pollution is a critical health issue. We studied particle emissions, concentration changes and size distribution mechanisms using an indoor space with air quality monitors, incense stick burning, and ventilation. Temporal changes in the concentrations of particles with sizes of 10 nm to 10 µm were monitored. Our findings show that particles affecting particle number concentration (PNC) were mainly in the Aitken mode (50–100 nm) and accumulation mode I (100–200 nm). Particle surface area concentration (PAC) was primarily in the 100–300 nm range, while particle volume concentration (PVC) was in the 100–200 nm and 300–1000 nm ranges. After extinguishing the incense sticks, ventilation was initiated. The ventilation period was split into FAO<sub>1–3</sub> (i.e., the first 3 min, 1–3 min of ventilation system operation) and FAO<sub>4–15</sub> (i.e., the last 12 min, 4–15 min of ventilation system operation). During FAO<sub>1–3</sub>, particle concentrations increased by 18.3 to 21.5%. This rise was due to the initial activation of the ventilation system, dispersing settled particles (mostly ≥ 41.2 nm) into the air. The FAO<sub>4–15</sub>/FAO<sub>1–3</sub> ratio for 12.3−2489.3 nm particles was always < 1, indicating that as the ventilation continued, it effectively removed particles of < 2.5 μm. After subsequent ventilation of 15-min operation, total PNC, PAC, and PVC were 70.3%, 70.0%, and 67.8% lower than during FAO<sub>1–3</sub> and the particle number mode diameter was 106.0 nm, with geometric standard deviations of 1.50 and 1.51 (left and right), indicating that the ventilation system was successful in removing smoke particles of all sizes simultaneously and evenly and achieved an approximate total removal efficiency of 70%, effectively filtering particles and reducing indoor air pollution.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"17 4","pages":"707 - 721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-023-01474-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Indoor air pollution is a critical health issue. We studied particle emissions, concentration changes and size distribution mechanisms using an indoor space with air quality monitors, incense stick burning, and ventilation. Temporal changes in the concentrations of particles with sizes of 10 nm to 10 µm were monitored. Our findings show that particles affecting particle number concentration (PNC) were mainly in the Aitken mode (50–100 nm) and accumulation mode I (100–200 nm). Particle surface area concentration (PAC) was primarily in the 100–300 nm range, while particle volume concentration (PVC) was in the 100–200 nm and 300–1000 nm ranges. After extinguishing the incense sticks, ventilation was initiated. The ventilation period was split into FAO1–3 (i.e., the first 3 min, 1–3 min of ventilation system operation) and FAO4–15 (i.e., the last 12 min, 4–15 min of ventilation system operation). During FAO1–3, particle concentrations increased by 18.3 to 21.5%. This rise was due to the initial activation of the ventilation system, dispersing settled particles (mostly ≥ 41.2 nm) into the air. The FAO4–15/FAO1–3 ratio for 12.3−2489.3 nm particles was always < 1, indicating that as the ventilation continued, it effectively removed particles of < 2.5 μm. After subsequent ventilation of 15-min operation, total PNC, PAC, and PVC were 70.3%, 70.0%, and 67.8% lower than during FAO1–3 and the particle number mode diameter was 106.0 nm, with geometric standard deviations of 1.50 and 1.51 (left and right), indicating that the ventilation system was successful in removing smoke particles of all sizes simultaneously and evenly and achieved an approximate total removal efficiency of 70%, effectively filtering particles and reducing indoor air pollution.
期刊介绍:
Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health.
It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes.
International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals.
Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements.
This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.