User verification of Abbott Alinity HQ hematology analyzer

Nilufer Bayraktar, D. Topcu
{"title":"User verification of Abbott Alinity HQ hematology analyzer","authors":"Nilufer Bayraktar, D. Topcu","doi":"10.1515/tjb-2023-0185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives This study aims to evaluate the performance characteristics of the Alinity HQ hematology analyzer in a routine laboratory setting. Methods In the study, precision (short-term and long-term precision), accuracy (method comparison with Abbott Cell Dyn Ruby and estimation of bias), confirmation of a background (Limit of Blank, LoB), and carry-over were used to evaluate the performance of Alinity HQ as recommended by ICSH, CLSI guidelines EP15-A3, EP09, EP17A2, and H26-A2. Acceptance criteria were based on manufacturer technical specifications and the EFLM Biological Variation Database. Results According to the short-term precision results, except for mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), all measurements exhibited coefficient variations (CV) lower than their verification limits. Basophil, eosinophil, and monocyte counts, as well as mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), MCHC, and red cell distribution width standard deviation (RDW-SD), did not meet the allowable imprecision criteria for the long-term precision study. The estimated bias for all analytes was within verification limits. However, the method comparison study showed concentration-dependent variations for MCHC, MCH, and mean platelet volume (MPV) parameters. Furthermore, the correlation of parameters between Alinity HQ and Cell Dyn Ruby ranged from 0.46 to 1.00. The LoB and carry-over studies demonstrated satisfactory performance for the Alinity HQ analyzer. Conclusions Although some parameters had higher CVs than expected and concentration-dependent bias, the overall analytical performance of Alinity HQ was found to be satisfactory. Alinity HQ is an accurate, highly precise analyzer with good analytical performance, suitable for high-volume laboratories.","PeriodicalId":23344,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry","volume":"10 40","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2023-0185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study aims to evaluate the performance characteristics of the Alinity HQ hematology analyzer in a routine laboratory setting. Methods In the study, precision (short-term and long-term precision), accuracy (method comparison with Abbott Cell Dyn Ruby and estimation of bias), confirmation of a background (Limit of Blank, LoB), and carry-over were used to evaluate the performance of Alinity HQ as recommended by ICSH, CLSI guidelines EP15-A3, EP09, EP17A2, and H26-A2. Acceptance criteria were based on manufacturer technical specifications and the EFLM Biological Variation Database. Results According to the short-term precision results, except for mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), all measurements exhibited coefficient variations (CV) lower than their verification limits. Basophil, eosinophil, and monocyte counts, as well as mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), MCHC, and red cell distribution width standard deviation (RDW-SD), did not meet the allowable imprecision criteria for the long-term precision study. The estimated bias for all analytes was within verification limits. However, the method comparison study showed concentration-dependent variations for MCHC, MCH, and mean platelet volume (MPV) parameters. Furthermore, the correlation of parameters between Alinity HQ and Cell Dyn Ruby ranged from 0.46 to 1.00. The LoB and carry-over studies demonstrated satisfactory performance for the Alinity HQ analyzer. Conclusions Although some parameters had higher CVs than expected and concentration-dependent bias, the overall analytical performance of Alinity HQ was found to be satisfactory. Alinity HQ is an accurate, highly precise analyzer with good analytical performance, suitable for high-volume laboratories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雅培 Alinity HQ 血液分析仪的用户验证
摘要目的本研究旨在评估Alinity HQ血液分析仪在常规实验室环境下的性能特征。方法采用ICSH、CLSI指南EP15-A3、EP09、EP17A2和H26-A2推荐的方法,通过精密度(短期和长期精密度)、准确度(与雅培细胞Dyn Ruby的方法比较和偏倚估计)、背景确认(空白限、LoB)和结转来评价Alinity HQ的性能。验收标准基于制造商技术规范和EFLM生物变异数据库。结果短期精密度结果显示,除平均红细胞体积(MCV)和平均红细胞血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)外,其余指标的变异系数(CV)均低于验证限。嗜碱性粒细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞和单核细胞计数,以及平均红细胞血红蛋白(MCH)、MCHC和红细胞分布宽度标准差(RDW-SD)不符合长期精确研究允许的不精确标准。所有分析物的估计偏倚都在验证范围内。然而,方法比较研究显示MCHC、MCH和平均血小板体积(MPV)参数的浓度依赖性变化。Alinity HQ与Cell Dyn Ruby的相关系数在0.46 ~ 1.00之间。LoB和结转研究表明Alinity HQ分析仪的性能令人满意。结论虽然某些参数的cv值高于预期,且存在浓度依赖偏差,但Alinity HQ的整体分析性能令人满意。Alinity HQ是一款准确、高精度的分析仪,具有良好的分析性能,适用于高容量实验室。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CXCL12/CXCR4 as a potential axis in diagnosis and predicting disease severity in COVID-19 patients: a new perspective Human estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) targeted cyclic peptides inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in MCF-7 cells In vitro and in silico investigations of the pro-apoptotic activity of Opuntia ficus-indica cladode extracts against K562 cells Evaluation of the implementation of the rational use of laboratory tests in the clinical chemistry laboratory Right vagotomy alters heart rate variability temporarily and increases total choline levels in rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1