Evaluation of the implementation of the rational use of laboratory tests in the clinical chemistry laboratory

H. Serin, Bağnu Orhan, Merve S. Say, H. Arslan, Sinemis Inal, B. B. Inal, Mehmet Şeneş
{"title":"Evaluation of the implementation of the rational use of laboratory tests in the clinical chemistry laboratory","authors":"H. Serin, Bağnu Orhan, Merve S. Say, H. Arslan, Sinemis Inal, B. B. Inal, Mehmet Şeneş","doi":"10.1515/tjb-2023-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The ‘Rational Laboratory Use Project’ (RLUP) was launched in 2018 by the Department of Examination and Diagnosis Services under the General Directorate of Health Services of the Republic of Turkey’s Ministry of Health. In this study, we aimed to determine the rate of implementation of RLUP in medical biochemistry laboratories, and to contribute to new regulations by collecting the information and opinions of the laboratory experts participating the survey. Methods Thirty questions were uploaded to an online survey tool (SurveyMonkey®, San Mateo, ABD). The first five were descriptive for laboratories. Among the remaining 25 questions, one is open-ended and addresses the various topics encompassed by the project’s scope. Results The questionnaire was completed by 202 medical biochemistry specialists, of whom 82.12 % reported that they did not implement autoverification. 55.65 % defined consultations in Hospital Management Information System (HIMS), but; 70.49 % were not using it actively. 57.69 % of the participants answered, “I agree” to the statement “I think RLUP is feasible”. It was observed that the specialists tried to implement rational laboratory practices partially depending on their laboratory capacity, hospital administration and Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). Conclusions Increasing clinicians’ awareness could increase the success of this project, which might provide more effective diagnosis and treatment for the patient. In our view, actively involving stakeholders of the information management system, which is not under the direct control of laboratory professionals, in the RLUP will accelerate the development of the project.","PeriodicalId":23344,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry","volume":"313 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2023-0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The ‘Rational Laboratory Use Project’ (RLUP) was launched in 2018 by the Department of Examination and Diagnosis Services under the General Directorate of Health Services of the Republic of Turkey’s Ministry of Health. In this study, we aimed to determine the rate of implementation of RLUP in medical biochemistry laboratories, and to contribute to new regulations by collecting the information and opinions of the laboratory experts participating the survey. Methods Thirty questions were uploaded to an online survey tool (SurveyMonkey®, San Mateo, ABD). The first five were descriptive for laboratories. Among the remaining 25 questions, one is open-ended and addresses the various topics encompassed by the project’s scope. Results The questionnaire was completed by 202 medical biochemistry specialists, of whom 82.12 % reported that they did not implement autoverification. 55.65 % defined consultations in Hospital Management Information System (HIMS), but; 70.49 % were not using it actively. 57.69 % of the participants answered, “I agree” to the statement “I think RLUP is feasible”. It was observed that the specialists tried to implement rational laboratory practices partially depending on their laboratory capacity, hospital administration and Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS). Conclusions Increasing clinicians’ awareness could increase the success of this project, which might provide more effective diagnosis and treatment for the patient. In our view, actively involving stakeholders of the information management system, which is not under the direct control of laboratory professionals, in the RLUP will accelerate the development of the project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估临床化学实验室合理使用化验项目的实施情况
摘要 目的 土耳其共和国卫生部卫生服务总局下属的检查和诊断服务部于2018年启动了 "实验室合理使用项目"(RLUP)。在本研究中,我们旨在通过收集参与调查的实验室专家的信息和意见,确定 RLUP 在医学生化实验室的实施率,并为新法规的制定做出贡献。方法 将 30 个问题上传到在线调查工具(SurveyMonkey®, San Mateo, ABD)。前五个问题是针对实验室的描述性问题。在其余 25 个问题中,有一个问题是开放式的,涉及项目范围内的各种主题。结果 202 名医学生物化学专家填写了调查问卷,其中 82.12 % 的专家表示他们没有实施自动核查。55.65%的人在医院管理信息系统(HIMS)中定义了会诊,但70.49%的人并未积极使用该系统。对于 "我认为 RLUP 是可行的 "这一说法,57.69% 的参与者回答 "我同意"。据观察,专家们尝试实施合理的实验室操作,部分取决于其实验室能力、医院管理和实验室信息管理系统(LIMS)。结论 提高临床医生的认识可增加该项目的成功率,从而为患者提供更有效的诊断和治疗。我们认为,让实验室专业人员无法直接控制的信息管理系统的利益相关者积极参与 RLUP,将加快项目的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CXCL12/CXCR4 as a potential axis in diagnosis and predicting disease severity in COVID-19 patients: a new perspective Human estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) targeted cyclic peptides inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in MCF-7 cells In vitro and in silico investigations of the pro-apoptotic activity of Opuntia ficus-indica cladode extracts against K562 cells Evaluation of the implementation of the rational use of laboratory tests in the clinical chemistry laboratory Right vagotomy alters heart rate variability temporarily and increases total choline levels in rats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1