Understanding the determinants of innovation across European member states: a fuzzy-set approach

Stephanie Fabri, Lisa A. Pace, Vincent Cassar, F. Bezzina
{"title":"Understanding the determinants of innovation across European member states: a fuzzy-set approach","authors":"Stephanie Fabri, Lisa A. Pace, Vincent Cassar, F. Bezzina","doi":"10.1108/ijis-11-2022-0230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe European Innovation Scoreboard is an important indicator of innovation performance across European Member States. Despite its wide application, the indicator fails to highlight the interlinkages that exist among innovation measures and focuses primarily on the linear relationship between the individual measures and the predicted outcome. This study aims to address this gap by applying a novel technique, the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), to shed light on these interlinkages and highlight the complexity of the determinants underlying innovation performance.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors adopted a configurational approach based on fsQCA that is implemented on innovation performance data from European Member States for the period 2011–2018. The approach is based on non-linearity and allows for the analysis of interlinkages based on equifinality, that is, the model recognises that there are different potential paths of high and low innovation performance. In addition, the approach allows for asymmetric relations, where a low innovation outcome is not the exact inverse of that which leads to high innovation outcome.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results clearly indicate that innovation outcomes are not based on simple linear relations. Thus, to reap the desired effects from investments in innovation inputs, the complex set of indicators on which innovation performance is based should be taken into consideration. The results clearly indicate the elements of equifinality and asymmetric relations. Different paths lead to high innovation performance and low innovation performance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe method applied to investigate the determinants of innovation performance is the prime original factor of this study. Thus, the study contributes to literature by highlighting the complexity involved in understanding innovation. By recognising and attempting to detangle this complexity, this study will assist not just academics but also policymakers in designing the necessary measures required to reach this important outcome for a country’s competitive edge.\n","PeriodicalId":44643,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation Science","volume":"9 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijis-11-2022-0230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The European Innovation Scoreboard is an important indicator of innovation performance across European Member States. Despite its wide application, the indicator fails to highlight the interlinkages that exist among innovation measures and focuses primarily on the linear relationship between the individual measures and the predicted outcome. This study aims to address this gap by applying a novel technique, the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), to shed light on these interlinkages and highlight the complexity of the determinants underlying innovation performance. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopted a configurational approach based on fsQCA that is implemented on innovation performance data from European Member States for the period 2011–2018. The approach is based on non-linearity and allows for the analysis of interlinkages based on equifinality, that is, the model recognises that there are different potential paths of high and low innovation performance. In addition, the approach allows for asymmetric relations, where a low innovation outcome is not the exact inverse of that which leads to high innovation outcome. Findings The results clearly indicate that innovation outcomes are not based on simple linear relations. Thus, to reap the desired effects from investments in innovation inputs, the complex set of indicators on which innovation performance is based should be taken into consideration. The results clearly indicate the elements of equifinality and asymmetric relations. Different paths lead to high innovation performance and low innovation performance. Originality/value The method applied to investigate the determinants of innovation performance is the prime original factor of this study. Thus, the study contributes to literature by highlighting the complexity involved in understanding innovation. By recognising and attempting to detangle this complexity, this study will assist not just academics but also policymakers in designing the necessary measures required to reach this important outcome for a country’s competitive edge.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解欧洲各成员国创新的决定因素:模糊集方法
目的:欧洲创新记分牌是衡量欧洲各成员国创新绩效的重要指标。尽管该指标得到了广泛的应用,但它未能突出创新措施之间存在的相互联系,而主要关注个别措施与预测结果之间的线性关系。本研究旨在通过应用一种新颖的技术——模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)来解决这一差距,以揭示这些相互联系,并突出创新绩效决定因素的复杂性。设计/方法/方法作者采用了一种基于fsQCA的配置方法,该方法基于2011-2018年期间欧洲成员国的创新绩效数据实施。该方法基于非线性,并允许基于等价性的相互联系分析,也就是说,该模型认识到存在高创新绩效和低创新绩效的不同潜在路径。此外,该方法允许不对称关系,其中低创新结果与导致高创新结果的结果并不完全相反。研究结果清楚地表明,创新成果不是基于简单的线性关系。因此,为了从创新投入的投资中获得预期的效果,应该考虑创新绩效所依据的一套复杂指标。结果清楚地表明了相等性和不对称关系的要素。不同的路径导致高创新绩效和低创新绩效。原创性/价值研究创新绩效决定因素的方法是本研究的主要原创性因素。因此,该研究通过强调理解创新所涉及的复杂性,为文献做出了贡献。通过认识并试图理清这种复杂性,本研究将不仅有助于学术界,也有助于政策制定者设计必要的措施,以实现这一对国家竞争优势至关重要的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Innovation Science publishes fundamental and applied research in innovation practices. As the official journal of the International Association of Innovation Professionals (IAOIP), the journal is a forum for the exchange of advanced knowledge in innovation, including emerging technologies and best practices, tools and techniques, metrics, and organization design and culture; as well as the stakeholder engagement, change management, and leadership skills required to ensure innovation succeeds. Areas of Coverage: -Innovation processes, methods, techniques- Individual''s role in Innovation- Improvements in HR, marketing, finance, or other disciplines that enable innovation- Innovation practices in specific industries or countries- Innovation centers, incubators, labs...- Regional or national economic development/policies related to innovation- Innovation competency, skills- Innovation conventions, competitions, or training- Innovation for entrepreneurs-Regional impacts on innovation- Growing innovationthrough university programs- Attracting innovative companies and entrepreneurs
期刊最新文献
Financial development and green technological innovation: a case of GCC countries Open innovation in hospitality and tourism services: a bibliometric analysis How do CCIs contribute to regional innovation? Situational selections of design methods for digital innovation processes Awakening the giant within: turning SME’s survival strategy into improved performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1