Effect of Collaborative Care on Fear of Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

IF 0.5 Q4 NURSING Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences Pub Date : 2023-12-09 DOI:10.5812/jnms-141576
Marzieh Ebrahimi, Ali Ansari Jaberi, Tayebeh Negahban Bonabi
{"title":"Effect of Collaborative Care on Fear of Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Marzieh Ebrahimi, Ali Ansari Jaberi, Tayebeh Negahban Bonabi","doi":"10.5812/jnms-141576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Fears about the future and uncertainty in multiple sclerosis (MS) can affect the patients’ adaptation and well-being. Objectives: This study investigated the effect of collaborative care on the fear of disease progression in MS patients. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients and their main caregivers were assigned into study groups (36 in the intervention and 43 in the control group) by randomized minimization method. For the intervention group, the collaborative care model was implemented in seven sessions over nine weeks. The data were collected using the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FOP Q-SF). Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk, chi-square, Fisher Exact, independent, and paired t-tests. Results: A near-significant difference was found between the groups after the intervention (P = 0.051). However, in intragroup comparisons, the FOP score significantly decreased in the intervention group (P = 0.001) and increased in the control group after the intervention (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Collaborative care could potentially be an effective strategy for managing FOP in patients with MS.","PeriodicalId":42130,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jnms-141576","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fears about the future and uncertainty in multiple sclerosis (MS) can affect the patients’ adaptation and well-being. Objectives: This study investigated the effect of collaborative care on the fear of disease progression in MS patients. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients and their main caregivers were assigned into study groups (36 in the intervention and 43 in the control group) by randomized minimization method. For the intervention group, the collaborative care model was implemented in seven sessions over nine weeks. The data were collected using the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FOP Q-SF). Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk, chi-square, Fisher Exact, independent, and paired t-tests. Results: A near-significant difference was found between the groups after the intervention (P = 0.051). However, in intragroup comparisons, the FOP score significantly decreased in the intervention group (P = 0.001) and increased in the control group after the intervention (P = 0.001). Conclusions: Collaborative care could potentially be an effective strategy for managing FOP in patients with MS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协作护理对多发性硬化症患者疾病进展恐惧的影响:随机对照试验
背景:多发性硬化症(MS)患者对未来的恐惧和不确定性会影响患者的适应和幸福感。目的:探讨协同护理对多发性硬化症患者疾病进展恐惧的影响。方法:采用随机最小化法,将患者及其主要照顾者分为干预组36例,对照组43例。对于干预组,协作护理模式在9周内实施了7次会议。数据收集使用恐惧进展问卷-短表格(FOP Q-SF)。数据分析采用描述性统计、Shapiro-Wilk、卡方、Fisher Exact、独立t检验和配对t检验。结果:干预后两组间差异接近显著(P = 0.051)。但在组内比较中,干预组干预后FOP评分显著降低(P = 0.001),对照组干预后FOP评分显著升高(P = 0.001)。结论:协作护理可能是治疗多发性硬化症患者FOP的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparing the Effects of Oral and Vaginal Evening Primrose Capsules with Concurrent Labor Induction and Exclusive Labor Induction on Bishop Score and Some Labor Outcomes: A Triple-Blind Clinical Trial Social Determinants of Reproductive Age Women's Sexual Health: A Scoping Review Effect of Collaborative Care on Fear of Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparison of Quality of Infant Care and Transition Difficulty to Motherhood Between Adolescent and Young Mothers in Karaj, Iran Providing Nursing Care to Patients with Mental Disorders Based on King's Goal Attainment Theory: A Quasi-Experimental Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1