Public-Private Partnering in Nuclear Reactor Development - Historical Review and Implications for Today

IF 0.5 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science Pub Date : 2023-12-09 DOI:10.1115/1.4064233
Steven Krahn, Andrew Sowder
{"title":"Public-Private Partnering in Nuclear Reactor Development - Historical Review and Implications for Today","authors":"Steven Krahn, Andrew Sowder","doi":"10.1115/1.4064233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The dominant nuclear reactor technologies that comprise the current global operating fleet were developed and deployed over a relatively short, mid-twentieth century, period spanning the 1950s and 60s. Four of these technologies were deployed at fleet scales and commercially exported. The historical record indicates a remarkably consistent process of phased technology development that enabled the commercialization of designs that would define the global nuclear marketplace, beginning with research and development (R&D) and advancing through test reactors, small and large demonstration reactors, and first commercial-scale units. Following proof-of-principle R&D, historical commercialization lead times (from decision to construction of a demonstration reactor to first commercial launch) ranged from 12 to16 years for these four commercial technologies. Key factors contributing to successful commercialization included durable government support for early R&D and varying degrees of public-private partnering through commercial launch. This partnering included arrangements for technical support, siting, facility ownership, nuclear material provision, and cost sharing. The policy environment was characterized by unambiguous government support; stabile, effective and informed government program management and oversight; and flexibility in the public-private partnership arrangements to promote technology development and demonstration. Government advocacy was structured to support progressively increasing industry independence and self-sufficiency. This experience is documented and analyzed in this paper to provide salient lessons and example program elements for contemporary efforts to stimulate development and commercialization of a new generation of advanced nuclear technologies through collaboration and public-private partnerships.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The dominant nuclear reactor technologies that comprise the current global operating fleet were developed and deployed over a relatively short, mid-twentieth century, period spanning the 1950s and 60s. Four of these technologies were deployed at fleet scales and commercially exported. The historical record indicates a remarkably consistent process of phased technology development that enabled the commercialization of designs that would define the global nuclear marketplace, beginning with research and development (R&D) and advancing through test reactors, small and large demonstration reactors, and first commercial-scale units. Following proof-of-principle R&D, historical commercialization lead times (from decision to construction of a demonstration reactor to first commercial launch) ranged from 12 to16 years for these four commercial technologies. Key factors contributing to successful commercialization included durable government support for early R&D and varying degrees of public-private partnering through commercial launch. This partnering included arrangements for technical support, siting, facility ownership, nuclear material provision, and cost sharing. The policy environment was characterized by unambiguous government support; stabile, effective and informed government program management and oversight; and flexibility in the public-private partnership arrangements to promote technology development and demonstration. Government advocacy was structured to support progressively increasing industry independence and self-sufficiency. This experience is documented and analyzed in this paper to provide salient lessons and example program elements for contemporary efforts to stimulate development and commercialization of a new generation of advanced nuclear technologies through collaboration and public-private partnerships.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核反应堆开发中的公私合作--历史回顾及对当今的启示
构成目前全球运行机群的主要核反应堆技术是在20世纪50年代和60年代相对较短的时间内开发和部署的。其中四项技术已大规模部署并进行商业出口。历史记录表明,一个非常一致的阶段性技术发展过程,使设计的商业化成为可能,这将定义全球核市场,从研究与开发(R&D)开始,通过试验反应堆、小型和大型示范反应堆以及第一个商业规模的机组推进。在经过原理验证的研发之后,这四种商业技术的历史商业化周期(从决定到建造示范反应堆再到首次商业发射)从12到16年不等。促成成功商业化的关键因素包括政府对早期研发的持续支持,以及通过商业发布进行不同程度的公私合作。这种伙伴关系包括技术支持、选址、设施所有权、核材料供应和费用分摊方面的安排。政策环境的特点是政府支持明确;稳定、有效和知情的政府项目管理和监督;灵活的公私伙伴关系安排,以促进技术开发和示范。政府的宣传是为了支持逐步提高工业独立性和自给自足。本文对这一经验进行了记录和分析,为当代通过合作和公私伙伴关系刺激新一代先进核技术的开发和商业化的努力提供了突出的教训和范例项目要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of Turbulent Mixing Factor and Study of Turbulent Flow Structures in PWR Sub Channel by DNS Effect of Radial Neutron Reflector on the Characteristics of Nuclear Fuel Burn-up Wave in a Fast Neutron Energy Spectrum Multiplying Medium: A Consistent Parametric Approach Reviewing Welding Procedures - Checklists for Nuclear Power Systems Performance of NB-CTMFD detector vs Ludlum 42-49B, and Fuji NSN3 detectors for hard (Am-Be) and soft (Cf-252 fission) energy spectra neutron sources within lead/concrete shielded configurations Performance of B-CTMFD Detector Vs Ludlum 42-49B, Fuji NSN3 Detectors for Fission Energy Spectrum Neutron Detection with the Source within Lead/concrete Shielded Configurations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1