Insights into the ecological impact of trout introduction in an oligotrophic lake using sedimentary environmental DNA

Lena A. Schallenberg, Georgia Thomson‐Laing, David Kelly, J. Pearman, Jamie D. Howarth, M. Vandergoes, Jonathan Puddick, Sean Fitzsimons, Andrew Rees, Susanna A. Wood
{"title":"Insights into the ecological impact of trout introduction in an oligotrophic lake using sedimentary environmental DNA","authors":"Lena A. Schallenberg, Georgia Thomson‐Laing, David Kelly, J. Pearman, Jamie D. Howarth, M. Vandergoes, Jonathan Puddick, Sean Fitzsimons, Andrew Rees, Susanna A. Wood","doi":"10.3897/mbmg.7.111467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduced trout can induce trophic cascades, however, a lack of pre-introduction data limits knowledge on their impact in many lakes. Traditional paleolimnological approaches have been used to study historic species changes, but until recently these have been restricted to taxa with preservable body-parts. To explore the ecosystem effects of Salmo trutta (brown trout) introduction on an oligotrophic lake in Aotearoa-New Zealand, we used a multi-marker sedimentary environmental DNA (sedDNA) approach coupled with pigments to detect changes across multiple trophic levels. DNA was extracted from core depths capturing approximately 100 years before and after the expected arrival of S. trutta, and metabarcoding was undertaken with four primer sets targeting the 12S rRNA (fish), 18S rRNA (eukaryotes) and cytochrome c oxidase (COI; eukaryotes) genes. The earliest detection of S. trutta eDNA was 1906 (1892–1919 CE with 95% high probability density function) suggesting their introduction was shortly before this. Native fish diversity (12S and 18S rRNA) decreased after the detection of S. trutta, albeit the data was patchy. A shift in overall eukaryotic and algal communities (18S rRNA and COI) was observed around 1856 (1841–1871 CE) to 1891 (1877–1904 CE), which aligns with the expected S. trutta introduction. However, taxonomy could not be assigned to many of the 18S rRNA and COI sequences. Pigment concentrations did not change markedly after S. trutta introduction. SedDNA provides a new tool for understanding the impact of disturbances such as the introduction of non-native species; however, there are still several methodological challenges to overcome.","PeriodicalId":18374,"journal":{"name":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","volume":"9 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabarcoding and Metagenomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.7.111467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduced trout can induce trophic cascades, however, a lack of pre-introduction data limits knowledge on their impact in many lakes. Traditional paleolimnological approaches have been used to study historic species changes, but until recently these have been restricted to taxa with preservable body-parts. To explore the ecosystem effects of Salmo trutta (brown trout) introduction on an oligotrophic lake in Aotearoa-New Zealand, we used a multi-marker sedimentary environmental DNA (sedDNA) approach coupled with pigments to detect changes across multiple trophic levels. DNA was extracted from core depths capturing approximately 100 years before and after the expected arrival of S. trutta, and metabarcoding was undertaken with four primer sets targeting the 12S rRNA (fish), 18S rRNA (eukaryotes) and cytochrome c oxidase (COI; eukaryotes) genes. The earliest detection of S. trutta eDNA was 1906 (1892–1919 CE with 95% high probability density function) suggesting their introduction was shortly before this. Native fish diversity (12S and 18S rRNA) decreased after the detection of S. trutta, albeit the data was patchy. A shift in overall eukaryotic and algal communities (18S rRNA and COI) was observed around 1856 (1841–1871 CE) to 1891 (1877–1904 CE), which aligns with the expected S. trutta introduction. However, taxonomy could not be assigned to many of the 18S rRNA and COI sequences. Pigment concentrations did not change markedly after S. trutta introduction. SedDNA provides a new tool for understanding the impact of disturbances such as the introduction of non-native species; however, there are still several methodological challenges to overcome.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用沉积环境 DNA 透视鳟鱼引入寡营养湖泊对生态的影响
引进的鳟鱼可以诱发营养级联,然而,缺乏引进前的数据限制了对它们在许多湖泊中的影响的了解。传统的古湖泊学方法被用于研究历史上的物种变化,但直到最近,这些方法还局限于具有可保存身体部位的分类群。为了探讨褐鳟(Salmo trutta)在新西兰奥特罗阿(Aotearoa-New Zealand)寡营养湖泊的生态系统效应,我们采用多标记沉积环境DNA (sedDNA)方法结合色素检测了不同营养水平的变化。在S. trutta到达前后约100年的核心深度中提取DNA,并使用四组引物对12S rRNA(鱼类),18S rRNA(真核生物)和细胞色素c氧化酶(COI;真核生物的基因。最早检测到S. trutta eDNA是在1906年(1892-1919年,95%高概率密度函数),这表明它们的引入是在此之前不久。发现S. trutta后,本地鱼类多样性(12S和18S rRNA)下降,尽管数据不完整。整个真核生物和藻类群落(18S rRNA和COI)在1856年(1841-1871年)到1891年(1877-1904年)之间发生了转变,这与预期的S. trutta引入一致。然而,许多18S rRNA和COI序列无法被分类。引种后色素浓度无明显变化。SedDNA为了解外来物种引入等干扰的影响提供了新的工具;然而,仍然有一些方法上的挑战需要克服。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Simple approaches for evaluation of OTU quality based on dissimilarity arrays Assessing the diversity of nematodes in the Store Mosse National Park (Sweden) using metabarcoding Halamphora taxa in Hungarian soda pans and shallow soda lakes detected via metabarcoding and microscopic analyses Insights into the ecological impact of trout introduction in an oligotrophic lake using sedimentary environmental DNA Exploring benthic diatom diversity in the West Antarctic Peninsula: insights from a morphological and molecular approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1