Predictive Value of Moral Sensitivity for Quality of Care Among Iranian Nurses

Hossein Khorany, Maryam Momeni, Abbas Ahmadi, S. Motalebi
{"title":"Predictive Value of Moral Sensitivity for Quality of Care Among Iranian Nurses","authors":"Hossein Khorany, Maryam Momeni, Abbas Ahmadi, S. Motalebi","doi":"10.5812/jjcdc-138899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Morality is an important factor affecting the quality of care. To provide high-quality patient care, nurses are facing a number of ethical problems that need moral skills to be solved. Moral sensitivity is the first logical step toward ethical decision-making and judgment. Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the predictive value of moral sensitivity for the quality of care delivered by Iranian nurses. Methods: This cross-sectional study was undertaken on 250 nurses who were selected by census sampling based on inclusion and exclusion criteria from selected hospitals in Qazvin, Iran, in 2022. The required data were gathered by the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ) and the Quality Patient Care Scale (QUALPAC). Data were analyzed using a multivariate regression model. Results: The mean age of the nurses was 32.62 ± 6.95 years old, ranging from 22 to 54 years. The quality of care from the viewpoint of most nurses (n = 198, 78.0%) was desirable. The highest quality of care was related to the physical dimension (69.56 ± 8.48), and the least was related to the psychosocial dimension (89.74 ± 9.47). The highest moral sensitivity was related to the dimensions of relational orientation (15.03 ± 2.93) and respect for the patient's autonomy (7.88 ± 1.73). The results also revealed that moral sensitivity (β = 0.43, P < 0.001), gender (β = 0.30, P < 0.001), and economic status (β = -0.17, P = 0.003) were the most significant predictors of the quality of nursing care. Conclusions: Our results highlighted that boosting moral sensitivity among nurses could be effective in improving the quality of nursing care. So, it is recommended to hold periodic training programs to teach ethical principles to nurses to promote their moral sensitivity and, therefore, the quality of patient care.","PeriodicalId":271852,"journal":{"name":"Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care","volume":"39 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jundishapur Journal of Chronic Disease Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/jjcdc-138899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Morality is an important factor affecting the quality of care. To provide high-quality patient care, nurses are facing a number of ethical problems that need moral skills to be solved. Moral sensitivity is the first logical step toward ethical decision-making and judgment. Objectives: This study was conducted to determine the predictive value of moral sensitivity for the quality of care delivered by Iranian nurses. Methods: This cross-sectional study was undertaken on 250 nurses who were selected by census sampling based on inclusion and exclusion criteria from selected hospitals in Qazvin, Iran, in 2022. The required data were gathered by the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire (MSQ) and the Quality Patient Care Scale (QUALPAC). Data were analyzed using a multivariate regression model. Results: The mean age of the nurses was 32.62 ± 6.95 years old, ranging from 22 to 54 years. The quality of care from the viewpoint of most nurses (n = 198, 78.0%) was desirable. The highest quality of care was related to the physical dimension (69.56 ± 8.48), and the least was related to the psychosocial dimension (89.74 ± 9.47). The highest moral sensitivity was related to the dimensions of relational orientation (15.03 ± 2.93) and respect for the patient's autonomy (7.88 ± 1.73). The results also revealed that moral sensitivity (β = 0.43, P < 0.001), gender (β = 0.30, P < 0.001), and economic status (β = -0.17, P = 0.003) were the most significant predictors of the quality of nursing care. Conclusions: Our results highlighted that boosting moral sensitivity among nurses could be effective in improving the quality of nursing care. So, it is recommended to hold periodic training programs to teach ethical principles to nurses to promote their moral sensitivity and, therefore, the quality of patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道德敏感性对伊朗护士护理质量的预测价值
背景:道德是影响护理质量的重要因素。为了提供高质量的病人护理,护士面临着许多需要道德技能来解决的伦理问题。道德敏感性是迈向伦理决策和判断的第一步逻辑。目的:本研究旨在确定道德敏感性对伊朗护士护理质量的预测价值。方法:对2022年在伊朗加兹温选定的医院根据纳入和排除标准通过人口普查抽样选出的250名护士进行横断面研究。采用道德敏感性问卷(MSQ)和优质病人护理量表(QUALPAC)收集所需数据。数据采用多元回归模型进行分析。结果:护理人员平均年龄为32.62±6.95岁,年龄范围为22 ~ 54岁。大多数护士(198人,78.0%)认为护理质量较好。护理质量最高的是身体维度(69.56±8.48),最低的是心理社会维度(89.74±9.47)。道德敏感度最高的维度为关系取向(15.03±2.93)和尊重患者自主(7.88±1.73)。道德敏感性(β = 0.43, P < 0.001)、性别(β = 0.30, P < 0.001)和经济状况(β = -0.17, P = 0.003)是影响护理质量的最显著因素。结论:我们的研究结果强调,提高护士的道德敏感性可以有效提高护理质量。因此,建议定期举办培训课程,向护士传授道德原则,以提高他们的道德敏感性,从而提高患者护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Frequency of Mortality and Adverse Outcomes of COVID-19 in Hospitalized Type 2 Diabetics with a History of Sitagliptin or Metformin Use The Effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Techniques on Muscular Strength in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Quasi-Experimental Study Vitamin D Level, Weight, Height, and BMI Among Children with Cystic Fibrosis: A Retrospective Study Survival Rate and Associated Risk Factors Among Hemodialysis Patients in Southwest Iran: A Retrospective Cohort Study Effect of Family-Centered Empowerment Model Using Mobile Learning on the Quality of Life in Children with Thalassemia: A Quasi-Experimental Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1