The Thought of Event and The Practice of Language—A Comparative Study of Heidegger’s and Wittgenstein’s Thoughts

Feng Lin
{"title":"The Thought of Event and The Practice of Language—A Comparative Study of Heidegger’s and Wittgenstein’s Thoughts","authors":"Feng Lin","doi":"10.22158/jrph.v6n4p26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Martin Heidegger and Ludwig Wittgenstein are two of the most important philosophers of twentieth-century philosophy, and their ideas became the founders of two major philosophical traditions (Continental Philosophy and Anglo-Saxon Philosophy). Their ideas were formed on the basis of a common problematic consciousness, i.e. a critique of the philosophy of subjectivity. So on this basis, it is possible to seek the intrinsic relationship between the two views, from which we can get a glimpse of the two philosophers’ different answers to the common problem and seek the possibility of mutual dialog.","PeriodicalId":229607,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History","volume":"37 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Philosophy and History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/jrph.v6n4p26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Martin Heidegger and Ludwig Wittgenstein are two of the most important philosophers of twentieth-century philosophy, and their ideas became the founders of two major philosophical traditions (Continental Philosophy and Anglo-Saxon Philosophy). Their ideas were formed on the basis of a common problematic consciousness, i.e. a critique of the philosophy of subjectivity. So on this basis, it is possible to seek the intrinsic relationship between the two views, from which we can get a glimpse of the two philosophers’ different answers to the common problem and seek the possibility of mutual dialog.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
事件的思想与语言的实践--海德格尔与维特根斯坦思想的比较研究
马丁·海德格尔和路德维希·维特根斯坦是20世纪哲学中最重要的两位哲学家,他们的思想成为两大哲学传统(大陆哲学和盎格鲁-撒克逊哲学)的创始人。他们的思想是在共同的问题意识基础上形成的,即对主体性哲学的批判。因此,在此基础上,我们有可能寻求两种观点之间的内在联系,从中我们可以看到两位哲学家对共同问题的不同回答,并寻求相互对话的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Marx’s Riddle Metaphor about History: Based on the Discussion of “The Riddle of History” Misconceptions Created by Tulodziecki’s Revisionist Account of Semmelweis’s Theory and Reasoning in the Philosophy of Science Literature Within the Space of Drawing: Lines and the Locus of Creation in Architectural Design Turing Machine Halting Problem, Russell’s Paradox and Gödel Incompleteness Theorem Artificial Intelligence as a Substitute for Human Creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1