{"title":"Irrational Economic Action: Running a Bitcoin Lightning Node for Negative Profit","authors":"Edward Gotham","doi":"10.5195/ledger.2023.289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bitcoin’s layer 2 (L2) solution is a payment channel network (PCN) that has an internal market of its own. Businesses (node operators) compete on a cost basis to maximize use of their locked liquidity by minimizing channel fees. From an economic perspective this is a standard profit maximization problem, however as described in Béres, Seres, and Benczúr (2021), profit on node operation is so low that it is economically irrational. Despite this, the number of nodes continues to grow, even as the price of Bitcoin declines. Many node businesses likely operate at a net USD loss, especially when factors such as labor and loss of access to capital are considered. This paper is an economist’s account of entering into an apparently irrational market. Due to difficulties with surveying node operators, the primary objective of the paper, uncovering the reason for financial loss making activity, was not discovered, however this paper is the first to: describe the internal L2 market for routing; provide basic business balance sheet items for a median scale node; describe the on-boarding process of node operation; and identify the need for differentiation of personal/routing/hybrid nodes.The market for routing is near-perfect in terms of internal competition, but sub-optimally arranged. Operating losses that many node operators face appear to be rationalized as a “fiat only” loss, node operators exist within a Bitcoin-only profit paradigm. Computing the actual fiat profit margin is not possible, due to insufficient data regarding the average fiat cost of the bitcoin deposited to provide routing liquidity.","PeriodicalId":36240,"journal":{"name":"Ledger","volume":"64 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ledger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2023.289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bitcoin’s layer 2 (L2) solution is a payment channel network (PCN) that has an internal market of its own. Businesses (node operators) compete on a cost basis to maximize use of their locked liquidity by minimizing channel fees. From an economic perspective this is a standard profit maximization problem, however as described in Béres, Seres, and Benczúr (2021), profit on node operation is so low that it is economically irrational. Despite this, the number of nodes continues to grow, even as the price of Bitcoin declines. Many node businesses likely operate at a net USD loss, especially when factors such as labor and loss of access to capital are considered. This paper is an economist’s account of entering into an apparently irrational market. Due to difficulties with surveying node operators, the primary objective of the paper, uncovering the reason for financial loss making activity, was not discovered, however this paper is the first to: describe the internal L2 market for routing; provide basic business balance sheet items for a median scale node; describe the on-boarding process of node operation; and identify the need for differentiation of personal/routing/hybrid nodes.The market for routing is near-perfect in terms of internal competition, but sub-optimally arranged. Operating losses that many node operators face appear to be rationalized as a “fiat only” loss, node operators exist within a Bitcoin-only profit paradigm. Computing the actual fiat profit margin is not possible, due to insufficient data regarding the average fiat cost of the bitcoin deposited to provide routing liquidity.
比特币的第二层(L2)解决方案是一个拥有自己内部市场的支付渠道网络(PCN)。企业(节点运营商)在成本基础上竞争,通过最小化渠道费用来最大限度地利用其锁定的流动性。从经济学的角度来看,这是一个标准的利润最大化问题,然而正如bsamures, Seres, and Benczúr(2021)所描述的那样,节点运营的利润太低,在经济上是不合理的。尽管如此,即使比特币的价格下降,节点的数量仍在继续增长。许多节点业务可能以美元净亏损的方式运营,特别是考虑到劳动力和资本损失等因素。本文是一位经济学家对进入一个显然非理性的市场的描述。由于调查节点运营商的困难,本文的主要目标是揭示财务亏损活动的原因,并没有发现,但本文是第一个:描述内部L2市场的路由;为中等规模节点提供基本的业务资产负债表项目;描述节点操作的入职过程;并确定个人/路由/混合节点的差异化需求。就内部竞争而言,路由市场近乎完美,但布局不够理想。许多节点运营商面临的运营亏损似乎被合理化为“仅限法币”亏损,节点运营商存在于仅限比特币的盈利模式中。由于提供路由流动性的比特币的平均法币成本数据不足,计算实际的法币利润率是不可能的。