Irrational Economic Action: Running a Bitcoin Lightning Node for Negative Profit

IF 0.6 Q4 ECONOMICS Ledger Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.5195/ledger.2023.289
Edward Gotham
{"title":"Irrational Economic Action: Running a Bitcoin Lightning Node for Negative Profit","authors":"Edward Gotham","doi":"10.5195/ledger.2023.289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bitcoin’s layer 2 (L2) solution is a payment channel network (PCN) that has an internal market of its own. Businesses (node operators) compete on a cost basis to maximize use of their locked liquidity by minimizing channel fees. From an economic perspective this is a standard profit maximization problem, however as described in Béres, Seres, and Benczúr (2021), profit on node operation is so low that it is economically irrational. Despite this, the number of nodes continues to grow, even as the price of Bitcoin declines. Many node businesses likely operate at a net USD loss, especially when factors such as labor and loss of access to capital are considered. This paper is an economist’s account of entering into an apparently irrational market. Due to difficulties with surveying node operators, the primary objective of the paper, uncovering the reason for financial loss making activity, was not discovered, however this paper is the first to: describe the internal L2 market for routing; provide basic business balance sheet items for a median scale node; describe the on-boarding process of node operation; and identify the need for differentiation of personal/routing/hybrid nodes.The market for routing is near-perfect in terms of internal competition, but sub-optimally arranged. Operating losses that many node operators face appear to be rationalized as a “fiat only” loss, node operators exist within a Bitcoin-only profit paradigm. Computing the actual fiat profit margin is not possible, due to insufficient data regarding the average fiat cost of the bitcoin deposited to provide routing liquidity.","PeriodicalId":36240,"journal":{"name":"Ledger","volume":"64 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ledger","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2023.289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bitcoin’s layer 2 (L2) solution is a payment channel network (PCN) that has an internal market of its own. Businesses (node operators) compete on a cost basis to maximize use of their locked liquidity by minimizing channel fees. From an economic perspective this is a standard profit maximization problem, however as described in Béres, Seres, and Benczúr (2021), profit on node operation is so low that it is economically irrational. Despite this, the number of nodes continues to grow, even as the price of Bitcoin declines. Many node businesses likely operate at a net USD loss, especially when factors such as labor and loss of access to capital are considered. This paper is an economist’s account of entering into an apparently irrational market. Due to difficulties with surveying node operators, the primary objective of the paper, uncovering the reason for financial loss making activity, was not discovered, however this paper is the first to: describe the internal L2 market for routing; provide basic business balance sheet items for a median scale node; describe the on-boarding process of node operation; and identify the need for differentiation of personal/routing/hybrid nodes.The market for routing is near-perfect in terms of internal competition, but sub-optimally arranged. Operating losses that many node operators face appear to be rationalized as a “fiat only” loss, node operators exist within a Bitcoin-only profit paradigm. Computing the actual fiat profit margin is not possible, due to insufficient data regarding the average fiat cost of the bitcoin deposited to provide routing liquidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非理性经济行为:运行比特币闪电节点获取负利润
比特币的第二层(L2)解决方案是一个拥有自己内部市场的支付渠道网络(PCN)。企业(节点运营商)在成本基础上竞争,通过最小化渠道费用来最大限度地利用其锁定的流动性。从经济学的角度来看,这是一个标准的利润最大化问题,然而正如bsamures, Seres, and Benczúr(2021)所描述的那样,节点运营的利润太低,在经济上是不合理的。尽管如此,即使比特币的价格下降,节点的数量仍在继续增长。许多节点业务可能以美元净亏损的方式运营,特别是考虑到劳动力和资本损失等因素。本文是一位经济学家对进入一个显然非理性的市场的描述。由于调查节点运营商的困难,本文的主要目标是揭示财务亏损活动的原因,并没有发现,但本文是第一个:描述内部L2市场的路由;为中等规模节点提供基本的业务资产负债表项目;描述节点操作的入职过程;并确定个人/路由/混合节点的差异化需求。就内部竞争而言,路由市场近乎完美,但布局不够理想。许多节点运营商面临的运营亏损似乎被合理化为“仅限法币”亏损,节点运营商存在于仅限比特币的盈利模式中。由于提供路由流动性的比特币的平均法币成本数据不足,计算实际的法币利润率是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ledger
Ledger Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tokenized Carbon Credits Irrational Economic Action: Running a Bitcoin Lightning Node for Negative Profit Blockchains and Triple-Entry Accounting for B2B Business Models A Token Economics Explanation for the De-Pegging of the Algorithmic Stablecoin: Analysis of the Case of Terra Economics of Open-Source Solar Photovoltaic Powered Cryptocurrency Mining
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1