The Effect of Different Dentin Desensitizers and Self- Adhesive Resin Cement on Shear Bond Strength: In Vitro Study

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL European Journal of Therapeutics Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.58600/eurjther1892
Işıl Keçik Büyükhatipoğlu, Derya Gürsel Sürmelioğlu
{"title":"The Effect of Different Dentin Desensitizers and Self- Adhesive Resin Cement on Shear Bond Strength: In Vitro Study","authors":"Işıl Keçik Büyükhatipoğlu, Derya Gürsel Sürmelioğlu","doi":"10.58600/eurjther1892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the bond strength of different dentin desensitizers and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin surfaces.\nMethods: The flat dentin surfaces of 72 wisdom molar teeth were randomly divided into six groups for bond strength analysis (n=12): Group CP: No desensitizer + Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0, Group CM: No desensitizer+ Primer A&B+ Multilink N, Group TP: Tokuyama Shield Force+ Primer II A&B + Panavia F 2.0, Group TM: Tokuyama Shield Force + Primer A&B+ Multilink N, Group UP: Universal dentin sealant + Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0 and Group UM: Universal dentin sealent + Primer A&B+ Multilink N. The shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). ANOVA test was used to detect significant differences at a p < 0.05.\nResults: The results indicated that bond strength values varied according to the desensitizing and resin cement materials (p < 0.05). The Tokuyama Shield Force desensitizer did not affect the bond strength of the resin cements to dentin (p > 0.05).\nConclusion: The different types of dentin desensitizer applications affected on the shear bond strength results of the self-adhesive resin cements.","PeriodicalId":42642,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the bond strength of different dentin desensitizers and self-adhesive resin cements to dentin surfaces. Methods: The flat dentin surfaces of 72 wisdom molar teeth were randomly divided into six groups for bond strength analysis (n=12): Group CP: No desensitizer + Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0, Group CM: No desensitizer+ Primer A&B+ Multilink N, Group TP: Tokuyama Shield Force+ Primer II A&B + Panavia F 2.0, Group TM: Tokuyama Shield Force + Primer A&B+ Multilink N, Group UP: Universal dentin sealant + Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0 and Group UM: Universal dentin sealent + Primer A&B+ Multilink N. The shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). ANOVA test was used to detect significant differences at a p < 0.05. Results: The results indicated that bond strength values varied according to the desensitizing and resin cement materials (p < 0.05). The Tokuyama Shield Force desensitizer did not affect the bond strength of the resin cements to dentin (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The different types of dentin desensitizer applications affected on the shear bond strength results of the self-adhesive resin cements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同牙本质脱敏剂和自粘树脂粘接剂对剪切粘接强度的影响:体外研究
目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较不同的牙本质脱敏剂和自粘树脂水泥与牙本质表面的结合强度。方法:将72颗智慧磨牙牙本质平面随机分为6组(n=12)进行结合强度分析:CP组:无脱敏剂+ Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0, CM组:无脱敏剂+ Primer A&B+ Multilink n, TP组:Tokuyama Shield Force+ Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0, TM组:Tokuyama Shield Force+ Primer A&B+ Multilink n, UP组:通用牙本质密封剂+ Primer II A&B+ Panavia F 2.0, UM组:万能牙本质密封剂+底漆A&B+ Multilink N.剪切粘结强度试验采用万能试验机(0.5 mm/min)。采用方差分析(ANOVA)检验,p < 0.05。结果:黏结强度值因脱敏材料和树脂水泥材料的不同而不同(p < 0.05)。Tokuyama盾构力脱敏剂对牙本质黏结强度无显著影响(p > 0.05)。结论:不同类型牙本质脱敏剂的应用对自粘树脂胶结物的剪切粘结强度有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Therapeutics
European Journal of Therapeutics MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
Adalimumab Treatment in a Case of Treatment-Resistant Acne Conglobata Uncommon HLA Alleles Observed in a Poopulation of Istanbul Province Cavitating Mesenteric Lymph Node Syndrome in a Patient with Celiac Disease: Differential Diagnosis Based on Radiological Findings A Rare Cause of Unilateral Breast Mass: Burkitt Lymphoma Hello AI: Is it Time for A Revolutionary Change in the Health Professional Education System?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1