Sediment-Nitrogen (N) connectivity: suspended sediments in streams as N exporters and reactors for denitrification and assimilatory N uptake during storms

IF 2.6 Q2 WATER RESOURCES Frontiers in Water Pub Date : 2023-12-06 DOI:10.3389/frwa.2023.1254225
Bisesh Joshi, Eva Bacmeister, Erin K. Peck, M. Peipoch, Jinjun Kan, Shreeram Inamdar
{"title":"Sediment-Nitrogen (N) connectivity: suspended sediments in streams as N exporters and reactors for denitrification and assimilatory N uptake during storms","authors":"Bisesh Joshi, Eva Bacmeister, Erin K. Peck, M. Peipoch, Jinjun Kan, Shreeram Inamdar","doi":"10.3389/frwa.2023.1254225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nitrogen (N) pollution in riverine ecosystems has substantial environmental, economic, and policy consequences. Various riverine N removal processes include permanent dissimilatory sinks such as denitrification (Uden) and temporary assimilatory sink such as microbial N uptake (Uassim). Both processes have been extensively evaluated in benthic sediments but only sparsely in the water column, particularly for storm flows producing high suspended sediment (SS) concentrations. Stormflows also increase the sediment bound N (Sed-N) export, and in turn, the overall N exports from watersheds. The balance between N removal by Uden and Uassim vs. Sed-N export has not been studied and is a key knowledge gap. We assessed the magnitude of Uden and Uassim against stormflow Sed-N exports for multiple storm events of varying magnitude and across two drainage areas (750 ha and 15,330 ha) in a mixed landuse mid-Atlantic US watershed. We asked: How do the Uden and Uassim sinks compare with Sed-N exports and how do these N fluxes vary across the drainage areas for sampled storms on the rising and falling limbs of the discharge hydrograph? Mean Uden and Uassim as % of the Sed-N exports ranged between 0.1–40% and 0.6–22%, respectively. Storm event Uassim fluxes were generally slightly lower than the corresponding Uden fluxes. Similarly, comparable but slightly higher Uden fluxes were observed for the second order vs. the fourth order stream, while Uassim fluxes were slightly higher in the fourth-order stream. Both of these N sinks were higher on the falling vs. rising limbs of the hydrograph. This suggests that while the N sinks are not trivial, sediment bound N exports during large stormflows will likely overshadow any gains in N removal by SS associated denitrification. Understanding these N source-sink dynamics for storm events is critical for accurate watershed nutrient modeling and for better pollution mitigation strategies for downstream aquatic ecosystems. These results are especially important within the context of climate change as extreme hydrological events including storms are becoming more and more frequent.","PeriodicalId":33801,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Water","volume":"41 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1254225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) pollution in riverine ecosystems has substantial environmental, economic, and policy consequences. Various riverine N removal processes include permanent dissimilatory sinks such as denitrification (Uden) and temporary assimilatory sink such as microbial N uptake (Uassim). Both processes have been extensively evaluated in benthic sediments but only sparsely in the water column, particularly for storm flows producing high suspended sediment (SS) concentrations. Stormflows also increase the sediment bound N (Sed-N) export, and in turn, the overall N exports from watersheds. The balance between N removal by Uden and Uassim vs. Sed-N export has not been studied and is a key knowledge gap. We assessed the magnitude of Uden and Uassim against stormflow Sed-N exports for multiple storm events of varying magnitude and across two drainage areas (750 ha and 15,330 ha) in a mixed landuse mid-Atlantic US watershed. We asked: How do the Uden and Uassim sinks compare with Sed-N exports and how do these N fluxes vary across the drainage areas for sampled storms on the rising and falling limbs of the discharge hydrograph? Mean Uden and Uassim as % of the Sed-N exports ranged between 0.1–40% and 0.6–22%, respectively. Storm event Uassim fluxes were generally slightly lower than the corresponding Uden fluxes. Similarly, comparable but slightly higher Uden fluxes were observed for the second order vs. the fourth order stream, while Uassim fluxes were slightly higher in the fourth-order stream. Both of these N sinks were higher on the falling vs. rising limbs of the hydrograph. This suggests that while the N sinks are not trivial, sediment bound N exports during large stormflows will likely overshadow any gains in N removal by SS associated denitrification. Understanding these N source-sink dynamics for storm events is critical for accurate watershed nutrient modeling and for better pollution mitigation strategies for downstream aquatic ecosystems. These results are especially important within the context of climate change as extreme hydrological events including storms are becoming more and more frequent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沉积物与氮(N)的连通性:溪流中的悬浮沉积物既是氮的输出者,又是暴风雨期间脱氮和同化吸收氮的反应器
河流生态系统中的氮污染具有重大的环境、经济和政策后果。各种河流氮去除过程包括永久异化汇,如反硝化(Uden)和临时同化汇,如微生物氮吸收(Uassim)。这两个过程已经在底栖沉积物中得到了广泛的评价,但在水柱中却很少得到评价,特别是在产生高悬浮沉积物(SS)浓度的风暴流中。暴雨还增加了泥沙束缚态氮(Sed-N)的输出,进而增加了流域的总氮输出。Uden和Uassim去除氮与Sed-N输出之间的平衡尚未得到研究,这是一个关键的知识空白。我们评估了乌登和乌西姆的震级,以及不同震级的多个风暴事件对美国大西洋中部混合土地利用流域两个流域(750公顷和15,330公顷)的风暴流seed - n输出。我们的问题是:Uden和Uassim汇与Sed-N输出相比如何?这些N通量如何在排放水文曲线上升和下降分支的采样风暴的排水区域变化?Uden和Uassim在Sed-N出口中的平均百分比分别为0.1-40%和0.6-22%。风暴事件的Uassim通量一般略低于相应的Uden通量。同样,与四阶流相比,二阶流的Uden通量相当,但略高,而四阶流的Uassim通量略高。这两种氮汇在水文曲线的下降分支上比上升分支上更高。这表明,虽然氮汇不是微不足道的,但在大暴雨期间,沉积物束缚的氮输出可能会掩盖SS相关反硝化去除氮的任何收益。了解这些风暴事件的氮源汇动态对于准确的流域养分建模和更好的下游水生生态系统污染缓解策略至关重要。这些结果在气候变化的背景下尤为重要,因为包括风暴在内的极端水文事件正变得越来越频繁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Water
Frontiers in Water WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
River-floodplain connectivity and residence times controlled by topographic bluffs along a backwater transition Rating curve development and uncertainty analysis in mountainous watersheds for informed hydrology and resource management Characterization of sewage quality and its spatiotemporal variations in a small town in Eastern Guangdong, China Model and remote-sensing-guided experimental design and hypothesis generation for monitoring snow-soil–plant interactions Precipitation fuels dissolved greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, N2O) dynamics in a peatland-dominated headwater stream: results from a continuous monitoring setup
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1