Was I thinking about thinking about the task? Measurement issues with self-reports of task-related and task-unrelated thoughts

William S. Helton, Kenneth Jacksonil
{"title":"Was I thinking about thinking about the task? Measurement issues with self-reports of task-related and task-unrelated thoughts","authors":"William S. Helton, Kenneth Jacksonil","doi":"10.1177/21695067231192694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In two studies we examined participants self-reports of their cognitive state after performing tasks. The reports of cognitive state included separate single item measures of task-related and task-unrelated thoughts framed as opposing sets (thoughts about X and –X). In study 1, we examined two data sets from previously published research. The correlation between task-related and task-unrelated thoughts was ~ r = −.25. In addition, the two items loaded onto separate factors when they were combined with other measures from the Short Task Relevant Evaluation of Stress State (STRESS). In study 2, 33 participants played a simulated natural disaster strategy game for five sessions and after each session they self-reported their cognitive state during the game. The correlation between task-related and task-unrelated thoughts at the individual level was also low, ~r = −.24. Participants may have difficulties accurately rating their thought content post-engaging in a task.","PeriodicalId":20673,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","volume":"134 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In two studies we examined participants self-reports of their cognitive state after performing tasks. The reports of cognitive state included separate single item measures of task-related and task-unrelated thoughts framed as opposing sets (thoughts about X and –X). In study 1, we examined two data sets from previously published research. The correlation between task-related and task-unrelated thoughts was ~ r = −.25. In addition, the two items loaded onto separate factors when they were combined with other measures from the Short Task Relevant Evaluation of Stress State (STRESS). In study 2, 33 participants played a simulated natural disaster strategy game for five sessions and after each session they self-reported their cognitive state during the game. The correlation between task-related and task-unrelated thoughts at the individual level was also low, ~r = −.24. Participants may have difficulties accurately rating their thought content post-engaging in a task.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我是否在思考任务?自我报告与任务相关和无关想法的测量问题
在两项研究中,我们检查了参与者在完成任务后的认知状态自我报告。认知状态报告包括对任务相关和任务无关想法的单独单项测量,这些想法被框定为对立的两组(关于X和-X的想法)。在研究1中,我们检查了先前发表的研究中的两个数据集。任务相关思维和任务无关思维之间的相关系数为~ r = - 0.25。此外,当这两个项目与应激状态短任务相关评价(Short Task Relevant Evaluation of Stress State,简称Stress)的其他测量相结合时,它们被加载到不同的因素上。在研究2中,33名参与者玩了五次模拟自然灾害策略游戏,每次游戏结束后,他们自我报告游戏期间的认知状态。在个体水平上,任务相关思维和任务无关思维之间的相关性也很低,~r = - 0.24。参与者在参与任务后可能难以准确评估他们的思想内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Novel Application of Non-linear Dynamics Investigating Cognitive Workload and Situational Trust in Highly Automated Vehicles Inattentional Insensitivity As A Predictor of Relevant Situation Awareness Questions And Irrelevant Questions Transitioning Lab Courses to Online Platforms by Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19 A Novel Application of Non-linear Dynamics Investigating Cognitive Workload and Situational Trust in Highly Automated Vehicles Transitioning Lab Courses to Online Platforms by Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1