{"title":"Design and Failure Analysis of Motorbike Sub-frame Using Finite\n Element Analysis","authors":"Ashish Sharma, Saharash Khare","doi":"10.4271/15-17-02-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All two-wheeler industries validate their product’s fatigue life on proving track\n before heading for mass production. Proving test tracks are made to simulate the\n end-user environment in order to find out the possible fatigue failures during\n each development stage of vehicle design, which in turn helps the CAE analysts\n to verify the design before it goes to the end-user hands. In this article we\n present the design and failure analysis of sub-frame assembly of motorbike\n observed during the accelerated fatigue test on proving track. Sub-frame main\n rod was found broken exactly between two weld endings during fatigue test before\n reaching 6% of the target fatigue life. Possible causes of sub-frame failures\n have been identified/analyzed in detail using fish bone diagram. A finite\n element analysis (FEA) model of sub-frame assembly was developed and a random\n response analysis was carried out on initial design. Acceleration input loads\n measured from test track have been given at the sub-frame mounting points to\n calculate output responses. Output responses show a high magnitude of amplitude\n stresses on the sub-frame main rod exactly where track test failure occurred.\n Fishbone diagram analysis indicates that the improper design of the stay\n bracket, stress concentrations regions in the design, improper weld/tool\n fixture, and method of welding could be reasons for failure. FEA on the final\n design concept shows a reduction of amplitude stress to 49% and an increase of\n fatigue life to an infinite limit as compared to initial design.","PeriodicalId":29661,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems","volume":"1 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/15-17-02-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
All two-wheeler industries validate their product’s fatigue life on proving track
before heading for mass production. Proving test tracks are made to simulate the
end-user environment in order to find out the possible fatigue failures during
each development stage of vehicle design, which in turn helps the CAE analysts
to verify the design before it goes to the end-user hands. In this article we
present the design and failure analysis of sub-frame assembly of motorbike
observed during the accelerated fatigue test on proving track. Sub-frame main
rod was found broken exactly between two weld endings during fatigue test before
reaching 6% of the target fatigue life. Possible causes of sub-frame failures
have been identified/analyzed in detail using fish bone diagram. A finite
element analysis (FEA) model of sub-frame assembly was developed and a random
response analysis was carried out on initial design. Acceleration input loads
measured from test track have been given at the sub-frame mounting points to
calculate output responses. Output responses show a high magnitude of amplitude
stresses on the sub-frame main rod exactly where track test failure occurred.
Fishbone diagram analysis indicates that the improper design of the stay
bracket, stress concentrations regions in the design, improper weld/tool
fixture, and method of welding could be reasons for failure. FEA on the final
design concept shows a reduction of amplitude stress to 49% and an increase of
fatigue life to an infinite limit as compared to initial design.