Rayleigh wave group velocities in North-West Iran: SOLA Backus-Gilbert vs. Fast Marching tomographic methods

Saman Amiri, Alessia Maggi, Mohammad Tatar, D. Zigone, C. Zaroli
{"title":"Rayleigh wave group velocities in North-West Iran: SOLA Backus-Gilbert vs. Fast Marching tomographic methods","authors":"Saman Amiri, Alessia Maggi, Mohammad Tatar, D. Zigone, C. Zaroli","doi":"10.26443/seismica.v2i2.1011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we focus on Northwest Iran and exploit a dataset of Rayleigh-wave group-velocity measurements obtained from ambient noise cross-correlations and earthquakes.We build group-velocity maps using the recently developed SOLA Backus-Gilbert linear tomographic scheme as well as the more traditional Fast-marching Surface-wave Tomography method.The SOLA approach produces robust, unbiased local averages of group velocities with detailed information on their local resolution and uncertainty; however, it does not as yet allow ray-path updates in the inversion process. The Fast-marching method, on the other hand, does allow ray-path updates, although it does not provide information on the resolution and uncertainties of the resulting models (at least not without great computational cost) and may suffer from bias due to model regularisation.The core of this work consists in comparing these two tomographic methods, in particular how they perform in the case of strong vs. weak seismic-velocity contrasts and good vs. poor data coverage. We demonstrate that the only case in which the Fast-marching inversion outperforms the SOLA inversion is for strong anomaly contrasts in regions with good path coverage; in all other configurations, the SOLA inversion produces more coherent anomalies with fewer artefacts.","PeriodicalId":498743,"journal":{"name":"Seismica","volume":"3 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismica","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26443/seismica.v2i2.1011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we focus on Northwest Iran and exploit a dataset of Rayleigh-wave group-velocity measurements obtained from ambient noise cross-correlations and earthquakes.We build group-velocity maps using the recently developed SOLA Backus-Gilbert linear tomographic scheme as well as the more traditional Fast-marching Surface-wave Tomography method.The SOLA approach produces robust, unbiased local averages of group velocities with detailed information on their local resolution and uncertainty; however, it does not as yet allow ray-path updates in the inversion process. The Fast-marching method, on the other hand, does allow ray-path updates, although it does not provide information on the resolution and uncertainties of the resulting models (at least not without great computational cost) and may suffer from bias due to model regularisation.The core of this work consists in comparing these two tomographic methods, in particular how they perform in the case of strong vs. weak seismic-velocity contrasts and good vs. poor data coverage. We demonstrate that the only case in which the Fast-marching inversion outperforms the SOLA inversion is for strong anomaly contrasts in regions with good path coverage; in all other configurations, the SOLA inversion produces more coherent anomalies with fewer artefacts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊朗西北部的瑞利波群速度:SOLA Backus-Gilbert 与快速行进层析成像方法对比
在这项研究中,我们将重点放在伊朗西北部,并利用从环境噪声相互关联和地震中获得的瑞利波群速度测量数据集。我们使用最近开发的SOLA Backus-Gilbert线性层析成像方案以及更传统的快速行进表面波层析成像方法构建群速度图。SOLA方法产生强大的、无偏的群速度局部平均值,并提供有关其局部分辨率和不确定性的详细信息;然而,它还不允许在反演过程中更新射线路径。另一方面,快速推进方法确实允许射线路径更新,尽管它不提供有关结果模型的分辨率和不确定性的信息(至少不是没有很大的计算成本),并且可能由于模型正则化而受到偏差。这项工作的核心在于比较这两种层析成像方法,特别是它们在强地震速度对比与弱地震速度对比以及数据覆盖良好与较差的情况下的表现。我们证明了快速前进反演优于SOLA反演的唯一情况是在路径覆盖良好的区域中出现强烈的异常对比;在所有其他配置中,SOLA反演产生的异常更连贯,人工制品更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of suspected Holocene fault scarp near Montréal, Québec: The first paleoseismic trench in eastern Canada Statistical distribution of static stress resolved onto geometrically-rough faults An exploration of potentially reversible controls on millennial-scale variations in the slip rate of seismogenic faults: Linking structural observations with variable earthquake recurrence patterns Earthquake source inversion by integrated fiber-optic sensing Curated Regional Earthquake Waveforms (CREW) Dataset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1