Přeshraniční znečištění v případu úniku kyanidu z těžebního provozu v Baia Mare: mezinárodněprávní aspekty

Denisa Hlušičková, Ondřej Vícha
{"title":"Přeshraniční znečištění v případu úniku kyanidu z těžebního provozu v Baia Mare: mezinárodněprávní aspekty","authors":"Denisa Hlušičková, Ondřej Vícha","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2023.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper traces the circumstances of the 2000 mining accident in the Romanian town of Baia Mare, which has been described as one of the worst environmental disasters since Chornobyl. Following this, the authors analyze the international legislation in force at the time of this accident and mention two types of obligations resulting from international treaties in force at the time, to which Romania was also a contracting party. At the turn of the millennium, there was a lack of legislation at the international and European Commission level to regulate this waste management process, making the whole process riskier and, in some cases, was also the reason for mining accidents associated with cyanide leaks into the environment. The authors describe the changes in international law adopted in response to the mining accidents, cite the case-law of the ECtHR related to the Baia Mare accident case (case Tǎtar v Romania). The authors leave aside the European and Czech aspects of the issue, which they will focus on in a separate article.","PeriodicalId":158742,"journal":{"name":"AUC IURIDICA","volume":"35 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUC IURIDICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The following paper traces the circumstances of the 2000 mining accident in the Romanian town of Baia Mare, which has been described as one of the worst environmental disasters since Chornobyl. Following this, the authors analyze the international legislation in force at the time of this accident and mention two types of obligations resulting from international treaties in force at the time, to which Romania was also a contracting party. At the turn of the millennium, there was a lack of legislation at the international and European Commission level to regulate this waste management process, making the whole process riskier and, in some cases, was also the reason for mining accidents associated with cyanide leaks into the environment. The authors describe the changes in international law adopted in response to the mining accidents, cite the case-law of the ECtHR related to the Baia Mare accident case (case Tǎtar v Romania). The authors leave aside the European and Czech aspects of the issue, which they will focus on in a separate article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴亚马雷氰化物泄漏事件中的跨界污染:国际法律问题
以下的文章追溯了2000年罗马尼亚巴亚马雷镇矿难的情况,这被描述为自切尔诺贝利以来最严重的环境灾难之一。在此之后,作者分析了这一事故发生时的有效国际立法,并提到当时有效的国际条约所产生的两类义务,罗马尼亚也是这些条约的缔约国。在千年之交,国际和欧洲委员会一级缺乏管制这种废物管理过程的立法,使整个过程更加危险,在某些情况下,这也是与氰化物泄漏到环境中有关的采矿事故的原因。作者描述了针对矿难而通过的国际法的变化,引用了欧洲人权法院有关巴亚马雷事故案件的判例法(案件Tǎtar诉罗马尼亚)。作者撇开欧洲和捷克方面的问题,他们将在另一篇文章中重点讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
National Report on Automation in Decision-Making in Public Administration in Slovakia Tracing the Evolutionary Path of Experimental Law: from Comparative Law to Regulatory Sandboxes National Report on Automation in Decision-Making in Civil Procedure in the Czech Republic Artificial Public Administration – Myth or Reality? The Advent of Space Administrative Law in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1