Úvahy nad (ne)možnostmi kolektivního vyjednávání ve státní službě ve světle mezinárodních pracovněprávních norem

J. Vácha, Jan Pichrt
{"title":"Úvahy nad (ne)možnostmi kolektivního vyjednávání ve státní službě ve světle mezinárodních pracovněprávních norem","authors":"J. Vácha, Jan Pichrt","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2023.46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to draw attention to the non-compliance of Czech enactment and possibilities of collective bargaining in civil service in the light of non-legally binding interpretation of responsible state institution (Department of civil service) with the requirements of the Conventions n. 98 and 154 of International Labour Organization, which the Czech Republic ratified and hence are legally binding, and with decisions of the Freedom of Association Committee relevant for these Conventions. After several years, the area of law is regrettably still unclear and considerably disputable as regards its interpretation.","PeriodicalId":158742,"journal":{"name":"AUC IURIDICA","volume":"33 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AUC IURIDICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2023.46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to draw attention to the non-compliance of Czech enactment and possibilities of collective bargaining in civil service in the light of non-legally binding interpretation of responsible state institution (Department of civil service) with the requirements of the Conventions n. 98 and 154 of International Labour Organization, which the Czech Republic ratified and hence are legally binding, and with decisions of the Freedom of Association Committee relevant for these Conventions. After several years, the area of law is regrettably still unclear and considerably disputable as regards its interpretation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从国际劳工法的角度思考公务员集体谈判的(不)可能性
这条的目的是提请注意捷克颁布的法令不符合捷克共和国批准的、因此具有法律约束力的国际劳工组织第98号和第154号公约的要求,以及根据负责任的国家机构(公务员司)的不具法律约束力的解释,公务员制度中的集体谈判的可能性。以及结社自由委员会与这些公约有关的决定。几年过去了,令人遗憾的是,法律领域仍然不明确,在其解释方面存在相当大的争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
National Report on Automation in Decision-Making in Public Administration in Slovakia Tracing the Evolutionary Path of Experimental Law: from Comparative Law to Regulatory Sandboxes National Report on Automation in Decision-Making in Civil Procedure in the Czech Republic Artificial Public Administration – Myth or Reality? The Advent of Space Administrative Law in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1