Comparison of Biometric Formulae for Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation

Mariam Ghaffar, Muhammad Muneer Quraishy, Muhammad Adnan Shaikh, Mehvash Hussain, Zaheer Sultan
{"title":"Comparison of Biometric Formulae for Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation","authors":"Mariam Ghaffar, Muhammad Muneer Quraishy, Muhammad Adnan Shaikh, Mehvash Hussain, Zaheer Sultan","doi":"10.36351/pjo.v40i1.1692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose:  To determine the accuracy of different biometric formulae for intraocular lens power (IOL) calculation in predicting a target postoperative refraction within ± 1.0 diopters in patients with long axial length undergoing phacoemulsification.\nStudy Design:  Cross sectional study.\nPlace and Duration of Study:  Department of Ophthalmology and visual sciences, Unit 1 Dow University of Health Sciences, Dr. Ruth KM Phau Civil Hospital Karachi from February 2019 to August 2019.\nMethods:  The study included 45 eyes with cataract and preoperative uncorrected visual acuity ranging from 6/60-6/12, axial length of 24.5 to 27.0 mm with no other ocular problem. IOL power was calculated with SRK-T, Holladay 1 and Haigis formula installed in optical biometer AL-Scan (Nidek Co, Ltd., Gamagori, Japan) and by Barrett universal 2 formula from http://www.apacrs.org/barrett_universal2/. Patients underwent phacoemulsification by single surgeon. Follow up included refractive status using Autorefractokertometer, URK-700 (Unicos Co., Ltd., Korea) at 6th week post-operatively. Deviation of actual postoperative refraction from the predicted target preoperative refraction were calculated and values within ± 1.0 diopter were considered accurate. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 22.\nResults:  Outcome in terms of postoperative refractive error (+1D to -1D) with respect to biometric formula showed 100% accuracy using Haigis formula, 90% accuracy using SRK-T formula, 72.72% accuracy using Barrett universal II formula and 66.67% accuracy using Holladay-1 formula.\nConclusion:  Haigis formula proved to be more reliable and accurate than SRK-T, Holladay 1 and Barrett universal II formulae for calculation of intraocular lens power in eyes with long axial length.","PeriodicalId":169886,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"19 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v40i1.1692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose:  To determine the accuracy of different biometric formulae for intraocular lens power (IOL) calculation in predicting a target postoperative refraction within ± 1.0 diopters in patients with long axial length undergoing phacoemulsification. Study Design:  Cross sectional study. Place and Duration of Study:  Department of Ophthalmology and visual sciences, Unit 1 Dow University of Health Sciences, Dr. Ruth KM Phau Civil Hospital Karachi from February 2019 to August 2019. Methods:  The study included 45 eyes with cataract and preoperative uncorrected visual acuity ranging from 6/60-6/12, axial length of 24.5 to 27.0 mm with no other ocular problem. IOL power was calculated with SRK-T, Holladay 1 and Haigis formula installed in optical biometer AL-Scan (Nidek Co, Ltd., Gamagori, Japan) and by Barrett universal 2 formula from http://www.apacrs.org/barrett_universal2/. Patients underwent phacoemulsification by single surgeon. Follow up included refractive status using Autorefractokertometer, URK-700 (Unicos Co., Ltd., Korea) at 6th week post-operatively. Deviation of actual postoperative refraction from the predicted target preoperative refraction were calculated and values within ± 1.0 diopter were considered accurate. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 22. Results:  Outcome in terms of postoperative refractive error (+1D to -1D) with respect to biometric formula showed 100% accuracy using Haigis formula, 90% accuracy using SRK-T formula, 72.72% accuracy using Barrett universal II formula and 66.67% accuracy using Holladay-1 formula. Conclusion:  Haigis formula proved to be more reliable and accurate than SRK-T, Holladay 1 and Barrett universal II formulae for calculation of intraocular lens power in eyes with long axial length.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼内透镜功率计算的生物计量公式比较
目的:探讨人工晶状体度数(IOL)计算中不同生物特征公式对长眼轴长超声乳化患者术后目标屈光度预测的准确性。研究设计:横断面研究。学习地点和时间:2019年2月至2019年8月,陶氏健康科学大学1单元眼科学和视觉科学系,Dr. Ruth KM Phau Civil Hospital Karachi。方法:45只白内障眼,术前未矫正视力6/60-6/12,眼轴长度24.5 ~ 27.0 mm,无其他眼部问题。使用安装在光学生物计AL-Scan (Nidek Co ., Ltd, Gamagori, Japan)中的SRK-T、Holladay 1和Haigis公式计算IOL度数,并使用http://www.apacrs.org/barrett_universal2/上的Barrett通用公式计算。患者行超声乳化术。随访包括术后第6周使用autorefrtokertometer, URK-700 (Unicos Co., Ltd, Korea)测量屈光状态。计算术后实际屈光度与术前预测目标的偏差,以±1.0屈光度为准确值。数据分析使用SPSS version 22。结果:生物识别公式的术后屈光不正(+1D至-1D)判定结果:Haigis公式准确率100%,SRK-T公式准确率90%,Barrett通用II公式准确率72.72%,Holladay-1公式准确率66.67%。结论:在计算长眼轴长人工晶状体度数时,Haigis公式比SRK-T、Holladay 1和Barrett通用II公式更可靠、准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Ramadan Fasting on Biometric Readings of Eye Diagnostic System Based on Deep Learning to Detect Diabetic Retinopathy Bilateral Glaucoma in An Infant with Phacomatosis Pigmentovascularis and Sturge-Weber Syndrome: A Rare Case Report Self-medication as an Initial Treatment and its Associated Complications in Ophthalmic Patients at Al-Khidmat Teaching Hospital, Mansoorah, Lahore, Pakistan Light Exposure in Young University Students: Effect on Ocular Surface Health
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1