A Case-Study Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Student’s Dropout from Multiple Online Educational Entities

IF 1.8 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Algorithms Pub Date : 2023-12-03 DOI:10.3390/a16120554
José Manuel Porras, J. Lara, Cristóbal Romero, Sebastián Ventura
{"title":"A Case-Study Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Student’s Dropout from Multiple Online Educational Entities","authors":"José Manuel Porras, J. Lara, Cristóbal Romero, Sebastián Ventura","doi":"10.3390/a16120554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predicting student dropout is a crucial task in online education. Traditionally, each educational entity (institution, university, faculty, department, etc.) creates and uses its own prediction model starting from its own data. However, that approach is not always feasible or advisable and may depend on the availability of data, local infrastructure, and resources. In those cases, there are various machine learning approaches for sharing data and/or models between educational entities, using a classical centralized machine learning approach or other more advanced approaches such as transfer learning or federated learning. In this paper, we used data from three different LMS Moodle servers representing homogeneous different-sized educational entities. We tested the performance of the different machine learning approaches for the problem of predicting student dropout with multiple educational entities involved. We used a deep learning algorithm as a predictive classifier method. Our preliminary findings provide useful information on the benefits and drawbacks of each approach, as well as suggestions for enhancing performance when there are multiple institutions. In our case, repurposed transfer learning, stacked transfer learning, and centralized approaches produced similar or better results than the locally trained models for most of the entities.","PeriodicalId":7636,"journal":{"name":"Algorithms","volume":"45 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/a16120554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting student dropout is a crucial task in online education. Traditionally, each educational entity (institution, university, faculty, department, etc.) creates and uses its own prediction model starting from its own data. However, that approach is not always feasible or advisable and may depend on the availability of data, local infrastructure, and resources. In those cases, there are various machine learning approaches for sharing data and/or models between educational entities, using a classical centralized machine learning approach or other more advanced approaches such as transfer learning or federated learning. In this paper, we used data from three different LMS Moodle servers representing homogeneous different-sized educational entities. We tested the performance of the different machine learning approaches for the problem of predicting student dropout with multiple educational entities involved. We used a deep learning algorithm as a predictive classifier method. Our preliminary findings provide useful information on the benefits and drawbacks of each approach, as well as suggestions for enhancing performance when there are multiple institutions. In our case, repurposed transfer learning, stacked transfer learning, and centralized approaches produced similar or better results than the locally trained models for most of the entities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测多个在线教育实体学生辍学情况的机器学习方法案例研究比较
预测学生辍学是在线教育的一项重要任务。传统上,每个教育实体(机构、大学、学院、部门等)都会根据自己的数据创建并使用自己的预测模型。然而,这种方法并不总是可行或可取的,并且可能取决于数据、本地基础设施和资源的可用性。在这些情况下,有各种机器学习方法用于在教育实体之间共享数据和/或模型,使用经典的集中式机器学习方法或其他更高级的方法,如迁移学习或联邦学习。在本文中,我们使用了来自三个不同的LMS Moodle服务器的数据,这些服务器代表了同构的不同大小的教育实体。我们测试了不同机器学习方法在预测涉及多个教育实体的学生退学问题上的性能。我们使用深度学习算法作为预测分类器方法。我们的初步研究结果提供了关于每种方法的优缺点的有用信息,以及在有多个机构时提高性能的建议。在我们的案例中,与大多数实体的本地训练模型相比,重新定位迁移学习、堆叠迁移学习和集中式方法产生了类似或更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Algorithms
Algorithms Mathematics-Numerical Analysis
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
394
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Specification Mining Based on the Ordering Points to Identify the Clustering Structure Clustering Algorithm and Model Checking Personalized Advertising in E-Commerce: Using Clickstream Data to Target High-Value Customers Navigating the Maps: Euclidean vs. Road Network Distances in Spatial Queries Hybrid Sparrow Search-Exponential Distribution Optimization with Differential Evolution for Parameter Prediction of Solar Photovoltaic Models Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Unconstrained Polygonal Fitting of 2D Shapes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1