Assessing Risky Behaviors Based on the Indicator Analysis of Statistics on Accidents at Work

IF 1.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Management Systems in Production Engineering Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.2478/mspe-2023-0043
Aneta Grodzicka
{"title":"Assessing Risky Behaviors Based on the Indicator Analysis of Statistics on Accidents at Work","authors":"Aneta Grodzicka","doi":"10.2478/mspe-2023-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the paper was to analyze risky behaviors in the mining industry on the example of the indicator analysis of the statistics on accidents at work. Selected criteria of generic analysis (structure index – causes of accidents) and indicator analysis (intensity index – frequency indicator of accidents) were used in the research. The source of data for the analysis of accident rate were the publications of the Statistics Poland entitled “Accidents at work” in Poland for 2010-2021. The study aimed at human causes, which included the following five groups: lack or improper handling of a material factor by the employee, failure to use protective equipment by the employee, improper willful behavior of the employee, improper mental and physical state of the employee, improper behavior of the employee. For the analysis of risky behaviors, the proposition of the frequency indicator of accidents at work was used in the form of the probability indicator of accidents caused by risky behaviors per 1,000 working people. Based on the indicator analysis of risky behaviors, a comparative analysis of statistics on accidents at work in the period 2010-2021 according to the criterion of human causes was developed for Poland and mining. The research is based on the data of the Statistics Poland (GUS), but can be extended with other data, e.g. industry data according to the State Mining Authority (WUG). The results of the research can be used for a comparative analysis of the statistics on accidents at work in relation to other sectors and sections of economic activity of the NACE (PKD). The publication contains the original results of the indicator analysis of the statistics on accidents at work according to the criterion of human causes in the mining industry, and they can be addressed to persons managing of mining plants and managers of mining supervision authorities.","PeriodicalId":44097,"journal":{"name":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","volume":" 40","pages":"389 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Systems in Production Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2023-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the paper was to analyze risky behaviors in the mining industry on the example of the indicator analysis of the statistics on accidents at work. Selected criteria of generic analysis (structure index – causes of accidents) and indicator analysis (intensity index – frequency indicator of accidents) were used in the research. The source of data for the analysis of accident rate were the publications of the Statistics Poland entitled “Accidents at work” in Poland for 2010-2021. The study aimed at human causes, which included the following five groups: lack or improper handling of a material factor by the employee, failure to use protective equipment by the employee, improper willful behavior of the employee, improper mental and physical state of the employee, improper behavior of the employee. For the analysis of risky behaviors, the proposition of the frequency indicator of accidents at work was used in the form of the probability indicator of accidents caused by risky behaviors per 1,000 working people. Based on the indicator analysis of risky behaviors, a comparative analysis of statistics on accidents at work in the period 2010-2021 according to the criterion of human causes was developed for Poland and mining. The research is based on the data of the Statistics Poland (GUS), but can be extended with other data, e.g. industry data according to the State Mining Authority (WUG). The results of the research can be used for a comparative analysis of the statistics on accidents at work in relation to other sectors and sections of economic activity of the NACE (PKD). The publication contains the original results of the indicator analysis of the statistics on accidents at work according to the criterion of human causes in the mining industry, and they can be addressed to persons managing of mining plants and managers of mining supervision authorities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据工伤事故统计指标分析评估风险行为
摘要本文以煤矿生产事故统计指标分析为例,对煤矿生产中的危险行为进行分析。研究采用了一般分析(结构指标-事故原因)和指标分析(强度指标-事故频度指标)的选择准则。分析事故率的数据来源是波兰统计局2010-2021年题为“波兰工作中的事故”的出版物。该研究针对人为原因,包括以下五组:员工缺乏或不当处理物质因素,员工未使用防护设备,员工不适当的故意行为,员工不适当的精神和身体状态,员工不适当的行为。对于危险行为的分析,使用工作事故频率指标的命题,以每千名劳动人口中危险行为导致事故的概率指标的形式进行。在危险行为指标分析的基础上,根据人为原因标准,对波兰和采矿业2010-2021年期间的工作事故统计数据进行了比较分析。该研究基于波兰统计局(GUS)的数据,但可以使用其他数据进行扩展,例如根据国家矿业局(WUG)的行业数据。研究结果可用于比较分析与NACE (PKD)其他部门和经济活动部门有关的工作事故统计数据。该出版物载有根据采矿业人为原因标准对工作事故统计数据进行指标分析的原始结果,可供矿山工厂管理人员和矿山监管部门管理人员使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
48
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mortar Method for 2D Elastic Bounded Contact Problems Developing Industry 5.0 To Effectively Harness Production Capacities A Bibliometric Analysis of Educational Research Publications on Lean Manufacturing: Identifying Key Themes and Trends Study of a Low-Cost Method for Estimating Energy Fuel Resources in Anthropogenic Sediments Application of Methods of Decentralized Systems in Management in Lean Manufacturing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1