Microbiomes in Post–Digital Rectal Exam Urine Samples are Linked to Prostate Cancer Risk

E. D. Crawford, R. Martin, Caleb D. Phillips, Whitney N. Stanton, A. van Bokhoven, M. S. Lucia, Paul Arangua, Francisco G. La Rosa, Zachary Grasmick, Ryan Terlecki, Margaret F. Meagher, Daisaku Hirano, J. C. Nickel, P. Werahera
{"title":"Microbiomes in Post–Digital Rectal Exam Urine Samples are Linked to Prostate Cancer Risk","authors":"E. D. Crawford, R. Martin, Caleb D. Phillips, Whitney N. Stanton, A. van Bokhoven, M. S. Lucia, Paul Arangua, Francisco G. La Rosa, Zachary Grasmick, Ryan Terlecki, Margaret F. Meagher, Daisaku Hirano, J. C. Nickel, P. Werahera","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Bacterial species including Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) have been associated with different inflammatory and neoplastic conditions in prostate cancer (PCa) tissue samples, but their clinical impact is unknown. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based clinical reports, we investigated the differential abundance and incidence of microbiomes in post–digital rectal exam (DRE) urine samples from patients with PCa and a matched control group at low risk of PCa.\n \n \n \n A total of 200 post-DRE urine samples were analyzed, 100 from patients with histopathologically confirmed PCa and 100 from men at very low risk of PCa with PSA <1.5 ng/mL as controls. Bacterial and fungal communities were characterized by NGS of 16S and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) loci, respectively, with species' relative abundances provided on physicians' clinical reports. The differential abundance and incidence of species between cancer and control groups were evaluated.\n \n \n \n Microbes were reported in 39% and 56% of PCa and control group samples, respectively. C. acnes had a significantly higher relative abundance in patients with PCa vs controls (P < .05), and C. acnes incidence rates were also nominally higher in patients with PCa as compared with controls (12.82% and 7.27%, respectively). By contrast, Finegoldia magna (F. magna) had a significantly higher relative abundance (P < .05) and incidence rate (P < .05) in controls as compared with patients with PCa.\n \n \n \n \n C. acnes was among the most prevalent bacterial species in PCa urine samples. F. magna identified in the low-risk group is responsible for production of equol, a soy metabolite associated with lowering risk of PCa, suggesting a role in prostate cancer chemoprevention.\n","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":" 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Bacterial species including Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) have been associated with different inflammatory and neoplastic conditions in prostate cancer (PCa) tissue samples, but their clinical impact is unknown. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based clinical reports, we investigated the differential abundance and incidence of microbiomes in post–digital rectal exam (DRE) urine samples from patients with PCa and a matched control group at low risk of PCa. A total of 200 post-DRE urine samples were analyzed, 100 from patients with histopathologically confirmed PCa and 100 from men at very low risk of PCa with PSA <1.5 ng/mL as controls. Bacterial and fungal communities were characterized by NGS of 16S and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) loci, respectively, with species' relative abundances provided on physicians' clinical reports. The differential abundance and incidence of species between cancer and control groups were evaluated. Microbes were reported in 39% and 56% of PCa and control group samples, respectively. C. acnes had a significantly higher relative abundance in patients with PCa vs controls (P < .05), and C. acnes incidence rates were also nominally higher in patients with PCa as compared with controls (12.82% and 7.27%, respectively). By contrast, Finegoldia magna (F. magna) had a significantly higher relative abundance (P < .05) and incidence rate (P < .05) in controls as compared with patients with PCa. C. acnes was among the most prevalent bacterial species in PCa urine samples. F. magna identified in the low-risk group is responsible for production of equol, a soy metabolite associated with lowering risk of PCa, suggesting a role in prostate cancer chemoprevention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字直肠检查后尿液样本中的微生物组与前列腺癌风险有关
包括痤疮表皮杆菌(C. acnes)在内的细菌种类与前列腺癌(PCa)组织样本中的不同炎症和肿瘤状况有关,但其临床影响尚不清楚。利用基于下一代测序(NGS)的临床报告,我们研究了PCa患者和低风险PCa对照组的直肠指检(DRE)后尿液样本中微生物组的丰度和发生率的差异。总共分析了200份dre后的尿液样本,其中100份来自组织病理学证实的PCa患者,100份来自PSA <1.5 ng/mL的极低PCa风险男性作为对照。细菌和真菌群落分别通过16S位点和ITS位点的NGS进行鉴定,物种的相对丰度由医生的临床报告提供。评估了肿瘤组和对照组之间物种丰度和发生率的差异。微生物分别在39%和56%的PCa和对照组样品中被报道。前列腺癌患者的C. acnes相对丰度明显高于对照组(P < 0.05),前列腺癌患者的C. acnes发病率也高于对照组(分别为12.82%和7.27%)。相比之下,与PCa患者相比,大细叶(F. magna)在对照组中的相对丰度(P < 0.05)和发病率(P < 0.05)均显著高于PCa患者。痤疮是PCa尿液样本中最常见的细菌种类之一。在低风险组中发现的F. magna负责产生雌马酚,雌马酚是一种与降低前列腺癌风险相关的大豆代谢物,这表明它在前列腺癌的化学预防中起作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urinary Bladder Melanosis Diagnosed Simultaneously With Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review Artificial Intelligence–Generated Patient Information Videos for Partial Nephrectomy by Medical Students With Expert Validation: A Pilot Study Using a Reconstructive Ladder for Surgical Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Disease Editorial Comment: Telehealth in Urology Beyond COVID-19 Limitations of ChatGPT for Patient Education Regarding Frequently Searched Questions About Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1