Using a Reconstructive Ladder for Surgical Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Disease

Emily Ji, Jonathan Rosenfeld, Devin Boehm, Rebecca Arteaga, Aidan Raikar, Jaewoo Kim, Ziho Lee
{"title":"Using a Reconstructive Ladder for Surgical Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Disease","authors":"Emily Ji, Jonathan Rosenfeld, Devin Boehm, Rebecca Arteaga, Aidan Raikar, Jaewoo Kim, Ziho Lee","doi":"10.1097/ju9.0000000000000163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Reconstruction of transplant ureteral stricture disease (USD) is a challenging surgical problem. In this article, we review our reconstructive ladder for robotic reconstruction of transplant USD and report our outcomes.\n \n \n \n We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing robotic transplant reimplantation for USD after kidney transplantation at our institution between 11/2021 and 3/2023. Only patients with at least 1-year follow-up were included. The first rung of our reconstructive ladder is a side-to-side nontransecting reimplant. We prefer this method whenever possible because it avoids transection of the ureter, preserving the fragile blood supply. When this technique is not possible, because of long stricture length and/or limited bladder mobility, we proceed to the second rung of our reconstructive ladder, a Boari flap reconstruction. Surgical success in our cohort was defined as being hardware-free without evidence of ureteral obstruction on imaging.\n \n \n \n There were 6 patients in our cohort: 3 underwent side-to-side reconstruction and 3 underwent Boari flap reconstruction. Median console time was 139 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 85-175), estimated blood loss was 25 milliliters (IQR 25-81), and length of stay was 1 day (IQR 1-3). We had one major (Clavien ≥ III) complication, which was an intensive care unit transfer postoperatively for hypertension requiring a nicardipine drip. Median follow-up was 14 months (IQR 13-18) with a 100% surgical success rate.\n \n \n \n Utilization of a reconstructive ladder for management of transplant USD may allow for a systematic approach based on reconstructive principles. Our approach was associated with excellent intermediate-term outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":74033,"journal":{"name":"JU open plus","volume":"2 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JU open plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ju9.0000000000000163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Reconstruction of transplant ureteral stricture disease (USD) is a challenging surgical problem. In this article, we review our reconstructive ladder for robotic reconstruction of transplant USD and report our outcomes. We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing robotic transplant reimplantation for USD after kidney transplantation at our institution between 11/2021 and 3/2023. Only patients with at least 1-year follow-up were included. The first rung of our reconstructive ladder is a side-to-side nontransecting reimplant. We prefer this method whenever possible because it avoids transection of the ureter, preserving the fragile blood supply. When this technique is not possible, because of long stricture length and/or limited bladder mobility, we proceed to the second rung of our reconstructive ladder, a Boari flap reconstruction. Surgical success in our cohort was defined as being hardware-free without evidence of ureteral obstruction on imaging. There were 6 patients in our cohort: 3 underwent side-to-side reconstruction and 3 underwent Boari flap reconstruction. Median console time was 139 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 85-175), estimated blood loss was 25 milliliters (IQR 25-81), and length of stay was 1 day (IQR 1-3). We had one major (Clavien ≥ III) complication, which was an intensive care unit transfer postoperatively for hypertension requiring a nicardipine drip. Median follow-up was 14 months (IQR 13-18) with a 100% surgical success rate. Utilization of a reconstructive ladder for management of transplant USD may allow for a systematic approach based on reconstructive principles. Our approach was associated with excellent intermediate-term outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用重建阶梯对移植性输尿管狭窄疾病进行手术重建
移植性输尿管狭窄疾病(USD)的重建是一个具有挑战性的手术问题。在本文中,我们回顾了机器人重建移植输尿管狭窄疾病的重建阶梯,并报告了我们的成果。 我们对 2021 年 11 月至 2023 年 3 月期间在我院接受机器人移植再植术治疗肾移植后输尿管狭窄的患者进行了回顾性研究。仅纳入了随访至少 1 年的患者。我们重建阶梯的第一级是侧对侧非切再植。我们尽可能选择这种方法,因为它可以避免横切输尿管,保护脆弱的血液供应。如果因为狭窄长度较长和/或膀胱活动受限而无法采用这种技术,我们就会采用重建阶梯的第二级,即 Boari 皮瓣重建。我们队列中的手术成功定义为无硬件损伤,且影像学检查无输尿管梗阻迹象。 我们的队列中有 6 位患者:3 位接受了侧对侧重建,3 位接受了 Boari 皮瓣重建。中位控制台时间为 139 分钟(四分位数间距 [IQR] 85-175),估计失血量为 25 毫升(IQR 25-81),住院时间为 1 天(IQR 1-3)。我们发生了一起重大(Clavien ≥ III)并发症,即术后因高血压转入重症监护室,需要使用尼卡地平滴注。中位随访时间为 14 个月(IQR 13-18),手术成功率为 100%。 利用重建阶梯来处理移植手术后的巩膜,可以根据重建原则采取系统的方法。我们的方法具有良好的中期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Urinary Bladder Melanosis Diagnosed Simultaneously With Urothelial Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review Artificial Intelligence–Generated Patient Information Videos for Partial Nephrectomy by Medical Students With Expert Validation: A Pilot Study Using a Reconstructive Ladder for Surgical Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Stricture Disease Editorial Comment: Telehealth in Urology Beyond COVID-19 Limitations of ChatGPT for Patient Education Regarding Frequently Searched Questions About Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1