EMDR therapy vs. supportive therapy as adjunctive treatment in trauma-exposed bipolar patients: A randomised controlled trial

Bridget Hogg , Joaquim Radua , Itxaso Gardoki-Souto , Marta Fontana-McNally , Walter Lupo , María Reinares , Esther Jiménez , Mercè Madre , Laura Blanco-Presas , Romina Cortizo , Anna Massó-Rodriguez , Juan Castaño , Isabel Argila , José Ignacio Castro-Rodriguez , Mercè Comes , Cristina Macias , Roberto Sánchez-González , Estanislao Mur-Mila , Patricia Novo , Adriane R. Rosa , Benedikt L. Amann
{"title":"EMDR therapy vs. supportive therapy as adjunctive treatment in trauma-exposed bipolar patients: A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Bridget Hogg ,&nbsp;Joaquim Radua ,&nbsp;Itxaso Gardoki-Souto ,&nbsp;Marta Fontana-McNally ,&nbsp;Walter Lupo ,&nbsp;María Reinares ,&nbsp;Esther Jiménez ,&nbsp;Mercè Madre ,&nbsp;Laura Blanco-Presas ,&nbsp;Romina Cortizo ,&nbsp;Anna Massó-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Juan Castaño ,&nbsp;Isabel Argila ,&nbsp;José Ignacio Castro-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Mercè Comes ,&nbsp;Cristina Macias ,&nbsp;Roberto Sánchez-González ,&nbsp;Estanislao Mur-Mila ,&nbsp;Patricia Novo ,&nbsp;Adriane R. Rosa ,&nbsp;Benedikt L. Amann","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.11.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div><span><span>Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) are frequently exposed to traumatic events which worsen </span>disease course, but this study is the first multicentre </span>randomised controlled trial to test the efficacy of a trauma-focused adjunctive psychotherapy in reducing BD affective relapse rates.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div><span><span><span>This multicentre randomised controlled trial included 77 patients with BD and current trauma-related symptoms. Participants were randomised to either 20 sessions of trauma-focused </span>Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing<span><span> (EMDR) therapy for BD, or 20 sessions of supportive therapy (ST). The primary outcome was relapse rates over 24-months, and secondary outcomes were improvements in affective and trauma symptoms, general functioning, and </span>cognitive impairment, assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and at 12- and 24-month follow-up. The trial was registered prior to starting enrolment in </span></span>clinical trials (</span><span><span>NCT02634372</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) and carried out in accordance with CONSORT guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no significant difference between treatment conditions in terms of relapse rates either with or without hospitalisation. EMDR was significantly superior to ST at the 12-month follow up in terms of reducing depressive symptoms (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.0006, <em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.969), manic symptoms (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.027, <em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.513), and improving functioning (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.038, <em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.486). There was no significant difference in dropout between treatment arms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although the primary efficacy criterion was not met in the current study, trauma-focused EMDR was superior to ST in reducing of affective symptoms and improvement of functioning, with benefits maintained at six months following the end of treatment. Both EMDR and ST reduced trauma symptoms as compared to baseline, possibly due to a shared benefit of psychotherapy. Importantly, focusing on traumatic events did not increase relapses or dropouts, suggesting psychological trauma can safely be addressed in a BD population using this protocol.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"17 4","pages":"Pages 203-214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950285323001126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients with bipolar disorder (BD) are frequently exposed to traumatic events which worsen disease course, but this study is the first multicentre randomised controlled trial to test the efficacy of a trauma-focused adjunctive psychotherapy in reducing BD affective relapse rates.

Materials and methods

This multicentre randomised controlled trial included 77 patients with BD and current trauma-related symptoms. Participants were randomised to either 20 sessions of trauma-focused Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy for BD, or 20 sessions of supportive therapy (ST). The primary outcome was relapse rates over 24-months, and secondary outcomes were improvements in affective and trauma symptoms, general functioning, and cognitive impairment, assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and at 12- and 24-month follow-up. The trial was registered prior to starting enrolment in clinical trials (NCT02634372) and carried out in accordance with CONSORT guidelines.

Results

There was no significant difference between treatment conditions in terms of relapse rates either with or without hospitalisation. EMDR was significantly superior to ST at the 12-month follow up in terms of reducing depressive symptoms (p = 0.0006, d = 0.969), manic symptoms (p = 0.027, d = 0.513), and improving functioning (p = 0.038, d = 0.486). There was no significant difference in dropout between treatment arms.

Conclusions

Although the primary efficacy criterion was not met in the current study, trauma-focused EMDR was superior to ST in reducing of affective symptoms and improvement of functioning, with benefits maintained at six months following the end of treatment. Both EMDR and ST reduced trauma symptoms as compared to baseline, possibly due to a shared benefit of psychotherapy. Importantly, focusing on traumatic events did not increase relapses or dropouts, suggesting psychological trauma can safely be addressed in a BD population using this protocol.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EMDR疗法与辅助疗法作为创伤暴露型躁郁症患者的辅助治疗:随机对照试验
导言躁郁症(BD)患者经常会遇到创伤事件,这些创伤事件会加重病程,但这项研究是首个多中心随机对照试验,测试了以创伤为重点的辅助心理疗法在降低BD情感复发率方面的疗效。参与者被随机分配接受20次以创伤为重点的眼动脱敏和再加工疗法(EMDR)或20次支持疗法(ST)。主要结果是24个月内的复发率,次要结果是情感和创伤症状、一般功能和认知障碍的改善情况,分别在基线、治疗后、12个月和24个月的随访中进行评估。该试验已在临床试验(NCT02634372)开始注册之前进行了登记,并按照CONSORT指南进行。在为期12个月的随访中,EMDR在减轻抑郁症状(p = 0.0006,d = 0.969)、躁狂症状(p = 0.027,d = 0.513)和改善功能(p = 0.038,d = 0.486)方面明显优于ST。结论虽然本研究未达到主要疗效标准,但以创伤为重点的 EMDR 在减少情感症状和改善功能方面优于 ST,且在治疗结束后的六个月内仍能保持疗效。与基线相比,EMDR和ST都能减少创伤症状,这可能是由于心理治疗的共同优势。重要的是,关注创伤事件并不会增加复发或辍学率,这表明使用该方案可以安全地解决BD人群的心理创伤问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate change and mental health: The urgent warning of Brazil and Spain's 2024 catastrophic floods. Prediction of pharmacological response in OCD using machine learning techniques and clinical and neuropsychological variables. Luis Martín-Santos: A multidimensional psychiatrist. Meta-analysis of the effects of adjuvant drugs in co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorder Validation study of the Spanish brief version of TEMPS-A
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1