Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Intestinal Permeability in Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Animal Studies

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Advances in Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100162
Zachary DiMattia , Janhavi J Damani , Emily Van Syoc , Connie J Rogers
{"title":"Effect of Probiotic Supplementation on Intestinal Permeability in Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Animal Studies","authors":"Zachary DiMattia ,&nbsp;Janhavi J Damani ,&nbsp;Emily Van Syoc ,&nbsp;Connie J Rogers","doi":"10.1016/j.advnut.2023.100162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Overweight and obesity are associated with increased intestinal permeability, characterized by loss of gut epithelial integrity, resulting in unregulated passage of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and other inflammatory triggers into circulation, i.e., metabolic endotoxemia. In obesity, shifts in the gut microbiome negatively impact intestinal permeability. Probiotics are an intervention that can target the gut microbiome by introducing beneficial microbial species, potentially restoring gut barrier integrity. Currently, the role of probiotic supplementation in ameliorating obesity- and overweight-associated increases in gut permeability has not been reviewed. This systematic review aimed to summarize findings from both animal and clinical studies that evaluated the effect of probiotic supplementation on obesity-induced impairment in intestinal permeability (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42022363538). A literature search was conducted using PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, and CAB Direct from origin until August 2023 using keywords of intestinal permeability, overweight or obesity, and probiotic supplementation. Of 920 records, 26 eligible records were included, comprising 12 animal and 14 clinical studies. Clinical trials ranged from 3 to 26 wk and were mostly parallel-arm (<em>n</em> = 13) or crossover (<em>n</em> = 1) design. In both animal and clinical studies, plasma/serum LPS was the most common measure of intestinal permeability. Eleven of 12 animal studies reported a positive effect of probiotic supplementation in reducing intestinal permeability. However, results from clinical trials were inconsistent, with half reporting reductions in serum LPS and half reporting no differences after probiotic supplementation. <em>Bifidobacterium</em>, <em>Lactobacillus</em>, and <em>Akkermansia</em> emerged as the most common genera in probiotic formulations among the animal and clinical studies that yielded positive results, suggesting that specific bacteria may be more effective at reducing intestinal permeability and improving gut barrier function. However, better standardization of strain use, dosage, duration, and the delivery matrix is needed to fully understand the probiotic impact on intestinal permeability in individuals with overweight and obesity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7349,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831323014497/pdfft?md5=081b52cca58a949bd29f80775ec205e4&pid=1-s2.0-S2161831323014497-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2161831323014497","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overweight and obesity are associated with increased intestinal permeability, characterized by loss of gut epithelial integrity, resulting in unregulated passage of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and other inflammatory triggers into circulation, i.e., metabolic endotoxemia. In obesity, shifts in the gut microbiome negatively impact intestinal permeability. Probiotics are an intervention that can target the gut microbiome by introducing beneficial microbial species, potentially restoring gut barrier integrity. Currently, the role of probiotic supplementation in ameliorating obesity- and overweight-associated increases in gut permeability has not been reviewed. This systematic review aimed to summarize findings from both animal and clinical studies that evaluated the effect of probiotic supplementation on obesity-induced impairment in intestinal permeability (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42022363538). A literature search was conducted using PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, and CAB Direct from origin until August 2023 using keywords of intestinal permeability, overweight or obesity, and probiotic supplementation. Of 920 records, 26 eligible records were included, comprising 12 animal and 14 clinical studies. Clinical trials ranged from 3 to 26 wk and were mostly parallel-arm (n = 13) or crossover (n = 1) design. In both animal and clinical studies, plasma/serum LPS was the most common measure of intestinal permeability. Eleven of 12 animal studies reported a positive effect of probiotic supplementation in reducing intestinal permeability. However, results from clinical trials were inconsistent, with half reporting reductions in serum LPS and half reporting no differences after probiotic supplementation. Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Akkermansia emerged as the most common genera in probiotic formulations among the animal and clinical studies that yielded positive results, suggesting that specific bacteria may be more effective at reducing intestinal permeability and improving gut barrier function. However, better standardization of strain use, dosage, duration, and the delivery matrix is needed to fully understand the probiotic impact on intestinal permeability in individuals with overweight and obesity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充益生菌对超重和肥胖症患者肠道渗透性的影响:随机对照试验和动物实验的系统回顾
超重和肥胖与肠道通透性增加有关,其特点是肠道上皮完整性丧失,导致脂多糖(LPS)和其他炎症诱因不受控制地进入血液循环,即代谢性内毒素血症。在肥胖症患者中,肠道微生物群的变化会对肠道通透性产生负面影响。益生菌是一种干预措施,可通过引入有益微生物物种来针对肠道微生物组进行干预,从而有可能恢复肠道屏障的完整性。目前,尚未对益生菌补充剂在改善肥胖和超重相关的肠道渗透性增加方面的作用进行综述。本系统综述旨在总结动物和临床研究的结果,这些研究评估了补充益生菌对肥胖引起的肠道渗透性损伤的影响(国际系统综述前瞻性登记,CRD42022363538)。我们使用 PubMed(Medline)、Web of Science 和 CAB Direct 进行了文献检索,关键词包括肠道通透性、超重或肥胖以及益生菌补充剂,检索时间为 PubMed(Medline)、Web of Science 和 CAB Direct 的起源至 2023 年 8 月。在 920 条记录中,有 26 条符合条件,包括 12 项动物研究和 14 项临床研究。临床试验从 3 周到 26 周不等,大多采用平行臂(13 项)或交叉(1 项)设计。在动物和临床研究中,血浆/血清 LPS 是最常用的肠道通透性指标。12 项动物研究中有 11 项报告称,补充益生菌对降低肠道渗透性有积极作用。然而,临床试验的结果并不一致,一半报告称血清 LPS 有所下降,一半报告称补充益生菌后没有差异。在取得积极结果的动物和临床研究中,双歧杆菌、乳酸杆菌和阿克曼斯菌是益生菌配方中最常见的菌属,这表明特定细菌在降低肠道渗透性和改善肠道屏障功能方面可能更有效。然而,要充分了解益生菌对超重和肥胖症患者肠道渗透性的影响,还需要更好地规范菌株使用、剂量、持续时间和给药基质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Nutrition
Advances in Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
117
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Advances in Nutrition (AN/Adv Nutr) publishes focused reviews on pivotal findings and recent research across all domains relevant to nutritional scientists and biomedical researchers. This encompasses nutrition-related research spanning biochemical, molecular, and genetic studies using experimental animal models, domestic animals, and human subjects. The journal also emphasizes clinical nutrition, epidemiology and public health, and nutrition education. Review articles concentrate on recent progress rather than broad historical developments. In addition to review articles, AN includes Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and supplements. Supplement proposals require pre-approval by the editor before submission. The journal features reports and position papers from the American Society for Nutrition, summaries of major government and foundation reports, and Nutrient Information briefs providing crucial details about dietary requirements, food sources, deficiencies, and other essential nutrient information. All submissions with scientific content undergo peer review by the Editors or their designees prior to acceptance for publication.
期刊最新文献
Inequalities in Research on Food Environment Policies: An Evidence Map of Global Evidence from 2010-2020 Biomedical Applications and Nutritional Value of Specific Food-Derived Polysaccharide-Based Hydrogels Associations between Variability in Between- and Within-Day Dietary Intake with Adiposity and Glucose Homeostasis in Adults: A Systematic Review Influence of the Interaction between Genetic Factors and Breastfeeding on Children’s Weight Status: A Systematic Review Carbohydrates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1