Total least squares bias in climate fingerprinting regressions with heterogeneous noise variances and correlated explanatory variables

IF 1.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmetrics Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1002/env.2835
Ross McKitrick
{"title":"Total least squares bias in climate fingerprinting regressions with heterogeneous noise variances and correlated explanatory variables","authors":"Ross McKitrick","doi":"10.1002/env.2835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Regression-based “fingerprinting” methods in climate science employ total least squares (TLS) or orthogonal regression to remedy attenuation bias arising from measurement error due to reliance on climate model-generated explanatory variables. Proving the consistency of multivariate TLS requires assuming noise variances are equal across all variables in the model. This assumption has been challenged empirically in the climate context but little is known about TLS biases when the assumption is violated. Monte Carlo analysis is used herein to examine coefficient biases when the noise variances are not equal. The analysis allows the explanatory variables to be negatively correlated which is typical in climate applications. Ordinary least squares (OLS) exhibits the expected attenuation bias which vanishes as the noise variances on the explanatory variables disappear. In some cases, TLS corrects attenuation bias but more typically imparts large and generally positive biases. OLS performs well when the true value of <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>β</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\beta =0 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> whereas TLS performs quite poorly. This implies that TLS is not well suited for tests of the null. When <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>β</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\beta =1 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> TLS tends to exhibit opposite biases to OLS. Diagnostic information specific to each data sample should be consulted before using TLS to avoid spurious inferences and replacing OLS attenuation bias with other, potentially larger biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":50512,"journal":{"name":"Environmetrics","volume":"35 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.2835","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmetrics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Regression-based “fingerprinting” methods in climate science employ total least squares (TLS) or orthogonal regression to remedy attenuation bias arising from measurement error due to reliance on climate model-generated explanatory variables. Proving the consistency of multivariate TLS requires assuming noise variances are equal across all variables in the model. This assumption has been challenged empirically in the climate context but little is known about TLS biases when the assumption is violated. Monte Carlo analysis is used herein to examine coefficient biases when the noise variances are not equal. The analysis allows the explanatory variables to be negatively correlated which is typical in climate applications. Ordinary least squares (OLS) exhibits the expected attenuation bias which vanishes as the noise variances on the explanatory variables disappear. In some cases, TLS corrects attenuation bias but more typically imparts large and generally positive biases. OLS performs well when the true value of β = 0 $$ \beta =0 $$ whereas TLS performs quite poorly. This implies that TLS is not well suited for tests of the null. When β = 1 $$ \beta =1 $$ TLS tends to exhibit opposite biases to OLS. Diagnostic information specific to each data sample should be consulted before using TLS to avoid spurious inferences and replacing OLS attenuation bias with other, potentially larger biases.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有异质噪声方差和相关解释变量的气候指纹回归中的总最小二乘法偏差
气候科学中基于回归的“指纹”方法采用总最小二乘(TLS)或正交回归来补救由于依赖气候模式生成的解释变量而导致的测量误差所引起的衰减偏差。证明多变量TLS的一致性需要假设模型中所有变量的噪声方差相等。这一假设在气候背景下受到了经验上的挑战,但当这一假设被违反时,人们对TLS偏差知之甚少。本文采用蒙特卡罗分析来检验噪声方差不相等时的系数偏差。分析允许解释变量呈负相关,这在气候应用中是典型的。普通最小二乘(OLS)表现出预期的衰减偏差,随着解释变量上的噪声方差的消失而消失。在某些情况下,TLS可以纠正衰减偏差,但更典型的是输入较大且通常为正的偏差。当β的真值=0 $$ \beta =0 $$时,OLS表现良好,而TLS表现相当差。这意味着TLS不适用于null的测试。当β=1 $$ \beta =1 $$时,TLS倾向于表现出与OLS相反的偏差。在使用TLS之前,应该参考特定于每个数据样本的诊断信息,以避免错误的推断,并用其他可能更大的偏差替换OLS衰减偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmetrics
Environmetrics 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
17.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmetrics, the official journal of The International Environmetrics Society (TIES), an Association of the International Statistical Institute, is devoted to the dissemination of high-quality quantitative research in the environmental sciences. The journal welcomes pertinent and innovative submissions from quantitative disciplines developing new statistical and mathematical techniques, methods, and theories that solve modern environmental problems. Articles must proffer substantive, new statistical or mathematical advances to answer important scientific questions in the environmental sciences, or must develop novel or enhanced statistical methodology with clear applications to environmental science. New methods should be illustrated with recent environmental data.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Bias correction of daily precipitation from climate models, using the Q-GAM method Issue Information A hierarchical constrained density regression model for predicting cluster-level dose-response Under the mantra: ‘Make use of colorblind friendly graphs’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1