Global Citizenship: Cultural, Religious and Spiritual—An Exploratory Scoping Review

CaraJane Millar, Laura Chahda, Lindsay B. Carey, Alexander Ly, Phoebe O. McLaren, Eutichia Drakopoulos, Anoo Bhopti
{"title":"Global Citizenship: Cultural, Religious and Spiritual—An Exploratory Scoping Review","authors":"CaraJane Millar, Laura Chahda, Lindsay B. Carey, Alexander Ly, Phoebe O. McLaren, Eutichia Drakopoulos, Anoo Bhopti","doi":"10.1007/s10943-023-01968-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper seeks to provide an exploration of the interplay between global citizenship, culture, religion and spirituality. Arksey and O’Malley’s (Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19–32, 2005) scoping literature review framework was utilised to qualify the research question, develop inclusion and exclusion criteria, select relevant studies, chart data and collate information. From the available peer-reviewed literature, a total of 44 articles were initially identified using the selection criteria, 19 of which were subsequently analysed. Eight main themes were identified within the literature; (1) development of global citizenship identity, (2) prosocial values and perspectives, (3) cultural competence and influence, (4) religion and religious teachings, (5) immersion experiences, (6) normative influence, (7) political compass and (8) spirituality. The literature suggests a clear link between global citizenship and spirituality. There were, however, some inconsistencies in the relationship between formalised religion and global citizenship across the studies, with evidence of religion both contributing to and detracting from prosocial values related to global citizenship. Additionally, cultural experiences, including immersion experiences, volunteering and study aboard were all positively linked to prosocial values related to global citizenship. Global citizenship provides individuals with an opportunity to develop intercultural skills, respect, sensitivity, empathy and concern for all of humanity. It is recommended that future global citizenship research should ensure adequate definitions of religion and spirituality, with caution to not generalise the two terms into one concept. Additional research into the relationship between spiritualty and global citizenship could provide a strong basis to increase understanding of the contributing factors to global citizenship identity.</p>","PeriodicalId":501640,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion and Health","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-023-01968-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper seeks to provide an exploration of the interplay between global citizenship, culture, religion and spirituality. Arksey and O’Malley’s (Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19–32, 2005) scoping literature review framework was utilised to qualify the research question, develop inclusion and exclusion criteria, select relevant studies, chart data and collate information. From the available peer-reviewed literature, a total of 44 articles were initially identified using the selection criteria, 19 of which were subsequently analysed. Eight main themes were identified within the literature; (1) development of global citizenship identity, (2) prosocial values and perspectives, (3) cultural competence and influence, (4) religion and religious teachings, (5) immersion experiences, (6) normative influence, (7) political compass and (8) spirituality. The literature suggests a clear link between global citizenship and spirituality. There were, however, some inconsistencies in the relationship between formalised religion and global citizenship across the studies, with evidence of religion both contributing to and detracting from prosocial values related to global citizenship. Additionally, cultural experiences, including immersion experiences, volunteering and study aboard were all positively linked to prosocial values related to global citizenship. Global citizenship provides individuals with an opportunity to develop intercultural skills, respect, sensitivity, empathy and concern for all of humanity. It is recommended that future global citizenship research should ensure adequate definitions of religion and spirituality, with caution to not generalise the two terms into one concept. Additional research into the relationship between spiritualty and global citizenship could provide a strong basis to increase understanding of the contributing factors to global citizenship identity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球公民意识:文化、宗教和精神--探索性范围审查
本文旨在探讨全球公民、文化、宗教和灵性之间的相互作用。Arksey和O 'Malley (Int J Soc Res methodology 8(1):19 - 32,2005)的范围文献综述框架被用于限定研究问题,制定纳入和排除标准,选择相关研究,图表数据和整理信息。从现有的同行评议文献中,最初使用选择标准确定了44篇文章,随后对其中19篇进行了分析。在文献中确定了八个主题;(1)全球公民认同的发展,(2)亲社会价值观和观点,(3)文化能力和影响,(4)宗教和宗教教义,(5)沉浸体验,(6)规范影响,(7)政治指南针和(8)灵性。文献表明,全球公民身份和灵性之间存在明显的联系。然而,在这些研究中,正规化宗教与全球公民之间的关系存在一些不一致之处,有证据表明,宗教既有助于也不利于与全球公民相关的亲社会价值观。此外,文化体验,包括沉浸式体验、志愿服务和出国留学,都与全球公民相关的亲社会价值观呈正相关。世界公民为个人提供了发展跨文化技能、尊重、敏感、同情和关心全人类的机会。建议未来的全球公民研究应确保对宗教和灵性有充分的定义,小心不要将这两个术语概括为一个概念。对精神和全球公民之间关系的进一步研究可以为增进对全球公民认同的影响因素的理解提供坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction: Beyond HIV Shame: Effects of Self-Forgiveness in Improving Mental Health in HIV-Positive Individuals in Poland The Enhancing of Nurses’ and Midwives’ Competence in Providing Spiritual Care through Innovative Education and Compassionate Care using the Spiritual Care Competency Self-Assessment Tool: Turkish Version Aphasia Awareness Among Spiritual Healthcare Providers in the United States Investigation of Hope and Spiritual Well-Being Levels among Relatives of Intensive Care Patients in Turkey A Longitudinal Investigation of the Prevalence and Incidence of Self-Reported COVID-19 Disease and the Pandemic’s Impact Among Seventh-day Adventist and Non-Adventists Living in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1