The role of an artificial intelligence software in clinical senology: a mammography multi-reader study

Enrica Bassi, Anna Russo, Eugenio Oliboni, Federico Zamboni, Cecilia De Santis, Giancarlo Mansueto, Stefania Montemezzi, Giovanni Foti
{"title":"The role of an artificial intelligence software in clinical senology: a mammography multi-reader study","authors":"Enrica Bassi, Anna Russo, Eugenio Oliboni, Federico Zamboni, Cecilia De Santis, Giancarlo Mansueto, Stefania Montemezzi, Giovanni Foti","doi":"10.1007/s11547-023-01751-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To evaluate the diagnostic role of a dedicated AI software in detecting anomalous breast findings on mammography and tomosynthesis images in the clinical setting, stand-alone and as aid of four readers.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A total of 210 patients with complete clinical and radiologic records were retrospectively analyzed. Pathology was used as the reference standard for patients undergoing surgery or biopsy, and a 1-year follow-up was used to confirm no change in the remaining patients.</p><p>The image evaluation was performed by four readers with different levels of experience (a junior and three senior breast radiologists) using a 5-point Likert scale moving from 1 (definitively no cancer) to 5 (definitively cancer).</p><p>The positivity of mammograms was assessed on the presence of any breast lesion (masses, architectural distortions, asymmetries, calcifications), including malignant and benign ones. A multi-reader multi-case analysis was performed. A <i>p</i> value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The stand-alone AI system achieved an accuracy of 71% (69% sensitivity and 73% specificity), which is overall lower than the value achieved by readers without AI. However, with the aid of AI, a significant increase of accuracy (<i>p</i> value = 0.004) and specificity (<i>p</i> value = 0.04) was achieved for the less experienced radiologist and a senior one.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The use of AI software as a second reader for breast lesions assessment could play a crucial role in the clinical setting, by increasing sensitivity and specificity, especially for less experienced radiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":501689,"journal":{"name":"La radiologia medica","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La radiologia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-023-01751-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic role of a dedicated AI software in detecting anomalous breast findings on mammography and tomosynthesis images in the clinical setting, stand-alone and as aid of four readers.

Methods

A total of 210 patients with complete clinical and radiologic records were retrospectively analyzed. Pathology was used as the reference standard for patients undergoing surgery or biopsy, and a 1-year follow-up was used to confirm no change in the remaining patients.

The image evaluation was performed by four readers with different levels of experience (a junior and three senior breast radiologists) using a 5-point Likert scale moving from 1 (definitively no cancer) to 5 (definitively cancer).

The positivity of mammograms was assessed on the presence of any breast lesion (masses, architectural distortions, asymmetries, calcifications), including malignant and benign ones. A multi-reader multi-case analysis was performed. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The stand-alone AI system achieved an accuracy of 71% (69% sensitivity and 73% specificity), which is overall lower than the value achieved by readers without AI. However, with the aid of AI, a significant increase of accuracy (p value = 0.004) and specificity (p value = 0.04) was achieved for the less experienced radiologist and a senior one.

Conclusion

The use of AI software as a second reader for breast lesions assessment could play a crucial role in the clinical setting, by increasing sensitivity and specificity, especially for less experienced radiologists.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能软件在临床老年医学中的作用:乳腺 X 射线摄影多读取器研究
目的评价专用人工智能软件在临床环境、独立和辅助四种阅读器下检测乳房x线摄影和层合图像异常的诊断作用。方法对210例有完整临床及影像学记录的患者进行回顾性分析。手术或活检患者以病理为参考标准,随访1年确认其余患者无变化。影像评估由四名具有不同经验水平的读者(一名初级和三名高级乳腺放射科医生)使用李克特5分制进行,从1(绝对没有癌症)到5(绝对有癌症)。乳房x光检查是否存在乳腺病变(肿块、结构扭曲、不对称、钙化),包括良性和恶性病变。进行了多读者多案例分析。p值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果独立人工智能系统的准确率为71%(灵敏度为69%,特异性为73%),总体上低于无人工智能阅读器的准确率。然而,在人工智能的帮助下,经验不足的放射科医生和经验丰富的放射科医生的准确率(p值= 0.004)和特异性(p值= 0.04)显著提高。结论使用人工智能软件作为乳腺病变评估的第二阅读器,可以提高灵敏度和特异性,在临床环境中发挥至关重要的作用,特别是对于经验不足的放射科医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MRI diagnostic performance and strategies for identifying retears in treated pediatric discoid and non-discoid lateral meniscal repairs Carotid artery assessment in dual-source photon-counting CT: impact of low-energy virtual monoenergetic imaging on image quality, vascular contrast and diagnostic assessability Percutaneous thermal segmentectomy for liver malignancies over 3 cm: mid-term oncological performance and predictors of sustained complete response from a multicentric Italian retrospective study Association between incidental perirenal fat stranding on CT and metabolic syndrome in otherwise healthy adults Pulmonary emphysema: the assessment of lung perfusion with Dual-Energy CT and pulmonary scintigraphy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1