Carotid artery assessment in dual-source photon-counting CT: impact of low-energy virtual monoenergetic imaging on image quality, vascular contrast and diagnostic assessability

Christian Booz, Giuseppe M. Bucolo, Tommaso D’Angelo, Silvio Mazziotti, Ludovica R. M. Lanzafame, Ibrahim Yel, Leona S. Alizadeh, Leon D. Gruenewald, Vitali Koch, Simon S. Martin, Mirela Dimitrova, Aynur Goekduman, Thomas J. Vogl, Hanns L. Kaatsch, Daniel Overhoff, Stephan Waldeck
{"title":"Carotid artery assessment in dual-source photon-counting CT: impact of low-energy virtual monoenergetic imaging on image quality, vascular contrast and diagnostic assessability","authors":"Christian Booz, Giuseppe M. Bucolo, Tommaso D’Angelo, Silvio Mazziotti, Ludovica R. M. Lanzafame, Ibrahim Yel, Leona S. Alizadeh, Leon D. Gruenewald, Vitali Koch, Simon S. Martin, Mirela Dimitrova, Aynur Goekduman, Thomas J. Vogl, Hanns L. Kaatsch, Daniel Overhoff, Stephan Waldeck","doi":"10.1007/s11547-024-01889-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Preliminary dual-energy CT studies have shown that low-energy virtual monoenergetic (VMI) + reconstructions can provide superior image quality compared to standard 120 kV CTA series. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of low-energy VMI reconstructions on quantitative and qualitative image quality, vascular contrast, and diagnostic assessability of the carotid artery in patients undergoing photon-counting CTA examinations.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>A total of 122 patients (67 male) who had undergone dual-source photon-counting CTA scans of the carotid artery were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Standard 120 kV CT images and low-keV VMI series from 40 to 100 keV with an interval of 15 keV were reconstructed. Quantitative analyses included the evaluation of vascular CT numbers, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). CT number measurements were performed in the common, external, and internal carotid arteries. Qualitative analyses were performed by three board-certified radiologists independently using five-point scales to evaluate image quality, vascular contrast, and diagnostic assessability of the carotid artery.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Mean attenuation, CNR and SNR values were highest in 40 keV VMI reconstructions (HU, 1362.32 ± 457.81; CNR, 33.19 ± 12.86; SNR, 34.37 ± 12.89) followed by 55-keV VMI reconstructions (HU, 736.94 ± 150.09; CNR, 24.49 ± 7.11; SNR, 26.25 ± 7.34); all three mean values at these keV levels were significantly higher compared with the remaining VMI series and standard 120 kV CT series (HU, 154.43 ± 23.69; CNR, 16.34 ± 5.47; SNR, 24.44 ± 7.14) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001).</p><p>The qualitative analysis showed the highest rating scores for 55 keV VMI reconstructions followed by 40 keV and 70 keV VMI series with a significant difference compared to standard 120 kV CT images series regarding image quality, vascular contrast, and diagnostic assessability of the carotid artery (all comparisons, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Low-keV VMI reconstructions at a level of 40–55 keV significantly improve image quality, vascular contrast, and the diagnostic assessability of the carotid artery compared with standard CT series in photon-counting CTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":501689,"journal":{"name":"La radiologia medica","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La radiologia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01889-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Preliminary dual-energy CT studies have shown that low-energy virtual monoenergetic (VMI) + reconstructions can provide superior image quality compared to standard 120 kV CTA series. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of low-energy VMI reconstructions on quantitative and qualitative image quality, vascular contrast, and diagnostic assessability of the carotid artery in patients undergoing photon-counting CTA examinations.

Materials and methods

A total of 122 patients (67 male) who had undergone dual-source photon-counting CTA scans of the carotid artery were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Standard 120 kV CT images and low-keV VMI series from 40 to 100 keV with an interval of 15 keV were reconstructed. Quantitative analyses included the evaluation of vascular CT numbers, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). CT number measurements were performed in the common, external, and internal carotid arteries. Qualitative analyses were performed by three board-certified radiologists independently using five-point scales to evaluate image quality, vascular contrast, and diagnostic assessability of the carotid artery.

Results

Mean attenuation, CNR and SNR values were highest in 40 keV VMI reconstructions (HU, 1362.32 ± 457.81; CNR, 33.19 ± 12.86; SNR, 34.37 ± 12.89) followed by 55-keV VMI reconstructions (HU, 736.94 ± 150.09; CNR, 24.49 ± 7.11; SNR, 26.25 ± 7.34); all three mean values at these keV levels were significantly higher compared with the remaining VMI series and standard 120 kV CT series (HU, 154.43 ± 23.69; CNR, 16.34 ± 5.47; SNR, 24.44 ± 7.14) (p < 0.0001).

The qualitative analysis showed the highest rating scores for 55 keV VMI reconstructions followed by 40 keV and 70 keV VMI series with a significant difference compared to standard 120 kV CT images series regarding image quality, vascular contrast, and diagnostic assessability of the carotid artery (all comparisons, p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Low-keV VMI reconstructions at a level of 40–55 keV significantly improve image quality, vascular contrast, and the diagnostic assessability of the carotid artery compared with standard CT series in photon-counting CTA.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双源光子计数 CT 中的颈动脉评估:低能量虚拟单能成像对图像质量、血管对比度和诊断可评估性的影响
目的初步的双能量 CT 研究表明,与标准 120 kV CTA 系列相比,低能量虚拟单能量(VMI)+ 重建可提供更优越的图像质量。本研究的目的是评估低能量 VMI 重建对接受光子计数 CTA 检查的患者颈动脉定量和定性图像质量、血管对比度和诊断可评估性的影响。材料和方法本研究对接受颈动脉双源光子计数 CTA 扫描的 122 名患者(67 名男性)进行了回顾性分析。重建了标准 120 kV CT 图像和 40 至 100 keV、间隔 15 keV 的低 keV VMI 系列图像。定量分析包括评估血管 CT 数量、信噪比 (SNR) 和对比度与噪声比 (CNR)。对颈总动脉、颈外动脉和颈内动脉进行了 CT 数量测量。定性分析由三位经委员会认证的放射科医生独立完成,采用五点评分法评估图像质量、血管对比度和颈动脉的诊断评估能力。结果 40 keV VMI 重建的平均衰减、CNR 和 SNR 值最高(HU, 1362.32 ± 457.81;CNR,33.19 ± 12.86;SNR,34.37 ± 12.89),其次是 55-keV VMI 重建(HU,736.94 ± 150.09;CNR,24.49 ± 7.11;SNR,26.25 ± 7.34);与其余 VMI 系列和标准 120 kV CT 系列相比,这些 keV 水平的所有三个平均值都明显更高(HU,154.43 ± 23.定性分析显示,55 keV VMI 重建的评分最高,其次是 40 keV 和 70 keV VMI 系列,在图像质量、血管对比度和颈动脉的诊断评估性方面与标准 120 kV CT 图像系列相比有显著差异(所有比较,p < 0.结论与光子计数 CTA 中的标准 CT 系列相比,40-55 千伏的低千伏 VMI 重建能显著提高图像质量、血管对比度和颈动脉的诊断评估能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MRI diagnostic performance and strategies for identifying retears in treated pediatric discoid and non-discoid lateral meniscal repairs Carotid artery assessment in dual-source photon-counting CT: impact of low-energy virtual monoenergetic imaging on image quality, vascular contrast and diagnostic assessability Percutaneous thermal segmentectomy for liver malignancies over 3 cm: mid-term oncological performance and predictors of sustained complete response from a multicentric Italian retrospective study Association between incidental perirenal fat stranding on CT and metabolic syndrome in otherwise healthy adults Pulmonary emphysema: the assessment of lung perfusion with Dual-Energy CT and pulmonary scintigraphy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1