Memorial as aegis: Colonial sovereignty and the unmaking of the Kanpur Memorial Well Monument

IF 1.3 2区 历史学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Journal of Historical Geography Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jhg.2023.11.009
Swati Chattopadhyay
{"title":"Memorial as aegis: Colonial sovereignty and the unmaking of the Kanpur Memorial Well Monument","authors":"Swati Chattopadhyay","doi":"10.1016/j.jhg.2023.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article addresses competing visions of sovereignty that underwrite recent debates about monuments. It turns to a well-known monument built to commemorate the loss of British lives in the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857–59: the Kanpur (Cawnpore) Memorial Well Monument. The memorial stood over a well in which the bodies of 200 British women and children killed by Indian sepoys lay buried. A large landscaped enclosure was built around the memorial and only European visitors were given access to the site. On August 15, 1947, the day of Indian independence from British rule, a crowd overran the site and defaced the monument. Much of the monument was subsequently dismantled and moved to a more secluded site within the Kanpur cantonment. The desire among the British stakeholders to leave no trace of its former identity focused attention on those aspects of meaning ascribed to the monument that could not be erased. Building on the Hobbesian idea of passion as a key element of sovereignty, this article argues that the monument may be viewed as an aegis — an <em>apotropaion —</em> that deflects gaze more than it enables attentive looking.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Geography","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305748823001123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article addresses competing visions of sovereignty that underwrite recent debates about monuments. It turns to a well-known monument built to commemorate the loss of British lives in the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857–59: the Kanpur (Cawnpore) Memorial Well Monument. The memorial stood over a well in which the bodies of 200 British women and children killed by Indian sepoys lay buried. A large landscaped enclosure was built around the memorial and only European visitors were given access to the site. On August 15, 1947, the day of Indian independence from British rule, a crowd overran the site and defaced the monument. Much of the monument was subsequently dismantled and moved to a more secluded site within the Kanpur cantonment. The desire among the British stakeholders to leave no trace of its former identity focused attention on those aspects of meaning ascribed to the monument that could not be erased. Building on the Hobbesian idea of passion as a key element of sovereignty, this article argues that the monument may be viewed as an aegis — an apotropaion — that deflects gaze more than it enables attentive looking.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纪念碑是保护伞:殖民主权与坎普尔纪念井纪念碑的解构
这篇文章讨论了最近关于纪念碑的争论中存在的相互矛盾的主权观点。它转向了一座著名的纪念碑,这座纪念碑是为了纪念1857-59年印度兵叛乱中丧生的英国人而建造的:坎普尔(坎普尔)纪念井纪念碑。纪念碑矗立在一口井旁,那里埋葬着被印度兵杀害的200名英国妇女和儿童的尸体。纪念碑周围建造了一个大型景观围栏,只有欧洲游客才能进入该遗址。1947年8月15日,印度从英国统治下独立的那一天,一群人占领了遗址,并破坏了纪念碑。大部分纪念碑随后被拆除,搬到了坎普尔营地内一个更隐蔽的地方。英国的利益相关者希望不留下它以前身份的痕迹,把注意力集中在那些不能被抹去的、赋予这座纪念碑的意义上。基于霍布斯关于激情是主权的关键要素的观点,这篇文章认为,纪念碑可以被看作是一种庇护——一种堕落——它转移了人们的目光,而不是让人们专心地看。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: A well-established international quarterly, the Journal of Historical Geography publishes articles on all aspects of historical geography and cognate fields, including environmental history. As well as publishing original research papers of interest to a wide international and interdisciplinary readership, the journal encourages lively discussion of methodological and conceptual issues and debates over new challenges facing researchers in the field. Each issue includes a substantial book review section.
期刊最新文献
Historical geographies of a Damascan population crisis: Jawlān and Ḥawrān in the late Mamluk - early Ottoman periods Contesting monuments: Heritage and historical geographies of inequality, an introduction Eastern isles, western isles: Geographical imaginaries and trans-island identities in British conceptions of Japan, 1800–1868 Map making as memory practice: The historical geography of East European shtetls as expressed in Jewish yizker bikher
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1