Responsible management education: The leadership role of PRME business schools

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS International Journal of Management Education Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100920
João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio , Walter Leal Filho , Amanda Lange Salvia , Marina Lourenção , Yana Medeiros Guimarães , Laís Viera Trevisan , Jelena Barbir , Adriana Cristina Ferreira Caldana
{"title":"Responsible management education: The leadership role of PRME business schools","authors":"João Henrique Paulino Pires Eustachio ,&nbsp;Walter Leal Filho ,&nbsp;Amanda Lange Salvia ,&nbsp;Marina Lourenção ,&nbsp;Yana Medeiros Guimarães ,&nbsp;Laís Viera Trevisan ,&nbsp;Jelena Barbir ,&nbsp;Adriana Cristina Ferreira Caldana","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The literature largely agrees about the relevance of higher education institutions in assembling their internal systems to contribute to sustainability challenges. Business schools are also expected to commit to the Sustainable Development Goals and become aligned with the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME). Moreover, it is suggested that if a business school is a PRME signatory, the students will likely be educated as responsible leaders. The literature on responsible management education successfully invested in literature reviews, framework development and analyses of the university reports available; however, it lacks solid studies conducted worldwide that aim to understand the extent to which professors are implementing sustainability-related concepts and the PRME principles into teaching as well as assessing if they have support from the top-management administration of their courses. Based on this gap, a world survey was conducted, receiving 969 valid answers from teaching staff in PRME signatory and non-signatory business schools from 104 different countries. Hypothesis testing, </span>descriptive statistics, and frequency analysis were deployed to understand the differences between PRME signatory and non-signatory institutions. The results indicate that PRME signatory business schools' professors significantly tend to include sustainability-related topics in their teaching and receive more support from their institution and superiors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47191,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Education","volume":"22 1","pages":"Article 100920"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Education","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472811723001581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The literature largely agrees about the relevance of higher education institutions in assembling their internal systems to contribute to sustainability challenges. Business schools are also expected to commit to the Sustainable Development Goals and become aligned with the Principles for Responsible Management Education (PRME). Moreover, it is suggested that if a business school is a PRME signatory, the students will likely be educated as responsible leaders. The literature on responsible management education successfully invested in literature reviews, framework development and analyses of the university reports available; however, it lacks solid studies conducted worldwide that aim to understand the extent to which professors are implementing sustainability-related concepts and the PRME principles into teaching as well as assessing if they have support from the top-management administration of their courses. Based on this gap, a world survey was conducted, receiving 969 valid answers from teaching staff in PRME signatory and non-signatory business schools from 104 different countries. Hypothesis testing, descriptive statistics, and frequency analysis were deployed to understand the differences between PRME signatory and non-signatory institutions. The results indicate that PRME signatory business schools' professors significantly tend to include sustainability-related topics in their teaching and receive more support from their institution and superiors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
负责任的管理教育:PRME 商学院的领导作用
文献在很大程度上同意高等教育机构在组装其内部系统以应对可持续性挑战方面的相关性。商学院也应致力于可持续发展目标,并与负责任管理教育原则(PRME)保持一致。此外,有人建议,如果一所商学院是PRME的签署国,学生可能会被教育成负责任的领导者。对责任管理教育的文献成功地进行了文献综述、框架开发和现有大学报告分析;然而,它缺乏在世界范围内进行的可靠研究,旨在了解教授在多大程度上将与可持续性有关的概念和PRME原则应用于教学,以及评估他们是否得到了课程最高管理部门的支持。基于这一差距,我们进行了一项全球调查,从104个不同国家签署了PRME的商学院和未签署PRME的商学院的教职员工那里收到了969个有效答案。采用假设检验、描述性统计和频率分析来了解PRME签署机构和非签署机构之间的差异。结果表明,PRME签约商学院的教授在教学中显著倾向于包含与可持续发展相关的主题,并得到了更多来自机构和上级的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
136
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Education provides a forum for scholarly reporting and discussion of developments in all aspects of teaching and learning in business and management. The Journal seeks reflective papers which bring together pedagogy and theories of management learning; descriptions of innovative teaching which include critical reflection on implementation and outcomes will also be considered.
期刊最新文献
Embedding engineering literacy into undergraduate business education: A multi-method study of program models and effectiveness Self-directed learners’ actual use and continuance intention in the MOOCverse: an S-O-R approach Erasmus+ Blended Intensive Programmes' role in promoting inclusivity and sustainability in management education - A survey-based evaluation From reflection to action: A student-led framework for responsible management education through community-engaged business projects in Southeast Asia Flipped learning in business and economics higher education: A systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1