ICT-based co-production and democracy: Enacting space, people, and authority in polycentric sites of governance in Estonia

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Government Information Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101905
Kristina Muhhina
{"title":"ICT-based co-production and democracy: Enacting space, people, and authority in polycentric sites of governance in Estonia","authors":"Kristina Muhhina","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2023.101905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the democratic risks and coping strategies related to ICT-enabled co-production. The article turns to the scholarship on polycentric governance and outlines three potential sources of institutional misfit relevant for practicing democracy in multi-centered sites of service provision: limited jurisdictional integrity, plural solidarities, and “liquid authority.” The empirical inquiry explores these points of misfit across three arenas of ICT-based co-production in Estonia. While the instances of co-production investigated resemble sites of polycentric governance, these tend to be unaccompanied by institutional arrangements able to address the democratic challenges that stem from multi-centered spaces. The findings offer evidence for the potential of ICT-enabled co-production to significantly alter the existing order of public governance while institutional innovations able to reconcile polycentricity with democracy are failing to keep pace.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"41 1","pages":"Article 101905"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23001053/pdfft?md5=57d57433a202493a87daa9d7542e7abb&pid=1-s2.0-S0740624X23001053-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23001053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the democratic risks and coping strategies related to ICT-enabled co-production. The article turns to the scholarship on polycentric governance and outlines three potential sources of institutional misfit relevant for practicing democracy in multi-centered sites of service provision: limited jurisdictional integrity, plural solidarities, and “liquid authority.” The empirical inquiry explores these points of misfit across three arenas of ICT-based co-production in Estonia. While the instances of co-production investigated resemble sites of polycentric governance, these tend to be unaccompanied by institutional arrangements able to address the democratic challenges that stem from multi-centered spaces. The findings offer evidence for the potential of ICT-enabled co-production to significantly alter the existing order of public governance while institutional innovations able to reconcile polycentricity with democracy are failing to keep pace.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于信息和通信技术的共同生产与民主:爱沙尼亚多中心治理场所中的空间、人和权威的形成
本研究考察了与信息通信技术联合制作相关的民主风险和应对策略。本文转向多中心治理的学术研究,并概述了与在多中心的服务提供场所实践民主相关的制度不适应的三个潜在来源:有限的司法完整性、多元团结和“流动权力”。实证调查探讨了爱沙尼亚基于信息通信技术的合作生产的三个领域的这些不适应点。虽然所调查的合作制作的实例类似于多中心治理的场所,但这些往往没有能够解决多中心空间产生的民主挑战的制度安排。研究结果表明,信息通信技术联合生产有可能显著改变现有的公共治理秩序,而能够协调多中心与民主的制度创新却未能跟上步伐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
期刊最新文献
A more secure framework for open government data sharing based on federated learning Does trust in government moderate the perception towards deepfakes? Comparative perspectives from Asia on the risks of AI and misinformation for democracy Open government data and self-efficacy: The empirical evidence of micro foundation via survey experiments Transforming towards inclusion-by-design: Information system design principles shaping data-driven financial inclusiveness Bridging the gap: Towards an expanded toolkit for AI-driven decision-making in the public sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1