Marital status, State policy environment and Foregone healthcare of same-sex families during the COVID-19 period

IF 3.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Social Science Research Pub Date : 2023-12-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102958
Jen-Hao Chen
{"title":"Marital status, State policy environment and Foregone healthcare of same-sex families during the COVID-19 period","authors":"Jen-Hao Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sexual minorities in the United States have often reported a higher likelihood of forgoing healthcare than heterosexuals, but whether this occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic remains underexplored. This study applies and extends the Andersen model to examine different-sex and same-sex families’ likelihood of forgoing healthcare during the pandemic using nationally representative data from the 2020 (May–October) Current Population Survey (N = 139,636). Results are that during the early stage of the pandemic (1) same-sex families overall are more likely than different-sex families to forgo medical care, (2) cohabitating same-sex families were less likely to forgo healthcare than their married counterparts, and (3) state policy environments will moderate only some of the differences in healthcare utilization by family types. Findings provide partial support for hypotheses and suggest a more careful consideration of the role of partnership and state policy in the Andersen model. Policy implications are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48338,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Research","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102958"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X23001138/pdfft?md5=0aa2e4b09c78938a5d98b38c0d532b1d&pid=1-s2.0-S0049089X23001138-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X23001138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual minorities in the United States have often reported a higher likelihood of forgoing healthcare than heterosexuals, but whether this occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic remains underexplored. This study applies and extends the Andersen model to examine different-sex and same-sex families’ likelihood of forgoing healthcare during the pandemic using nationally representative data from the 2020 (May–October) Current Population Survey (N = 139,636). Results are that during the early stage of the pandemic (1) same-sex families overall are more likely than different-sex families to forgo medical care, (2) cohabitating same-sex families were less likely to forgo healthcare than their married counterparts, and (3) state policy environments will moderate only some of the differences in healthcare utilization by family types. Findings provide partial support for hypotheses and suggest a more careful consideration of the role of partnership and state policy in the Andersen model. Policy implications are also discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 期间同性家庭的婚姻状况、国家政策环境和放弃的医疗保健
据报道,美国的性少数群体比异性恋者更有可能放弃医疗保健,但这种情况是否发生在COVID-19大流行期间仍未得到充分研究。本研究应用并扩展了Andersen模型,利用2020年(5月至10月)当前人口调查(N = 139,636)的全国代表性数据,研究了不同性别和同性家庭在大流行期间放弃医疗保健的可能性。结果表明:在疫情早期,同性家庭总体上比异性家庭更倾向于放弃医疗保健;同居同性家庭放弃医疗保健的可能性低于已婚同性家庭;国家政策环境只会调节家庭类型在医疗保健利用方面的部分差异。研究结果为假设提供了部分支持,并建议在Andersen模型中更仔细地考虑伙伴关系和国家政策的作用。本文还讨论了政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Social Science Research publishes papers devoted to quantitative social science research and methodology. The journal features articles that illustrate the use of quantitative methods in the empirical solution of substantive problems, and emphasizes those concerned with issues or methods that cut across traditional disciplinary lines. Special attention is given to methods that have been used by only one particular social science discipline, but that may have application to a broader range of areas.
期刊最新文献
Impact of layoffs on mortality and physical health in transitional China 1989–2015 Political and educational dynamics behind the Evangelicals’ stance against mask mandates during COVID-19 in the U.S. Social welfare expansion and political support during economic slowdown: A panel data analysis of China, 2010–2018 Punishing “gender deviants”? Women born in the year of the white horse and college selectivity The effects of world society on international poverty, 1990–2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1