The Grief Response Scale (GRS): Development and initial validation of a new instrument based on the integrative-relational model in a sample of bereaved people

Alba Payás-Puigarnau , Manuel Fernández-Alcántara , Alexandra Coelho , María Nieves Pérez-Marfil , Francisco Cruz-Quintana , Dulce Camacho , Adrián Montesano del Campo , María José Cabañero-Martínez
{"title":"The Grief Response Scale (GRS): Development and initial validation of a new instrument based on the integrative-relational model in a sample of bereaved people","authors":"Alba Payás-Puigarnau ,&nbsp;Manuel Fernández-Alcántara ,&nbsp;Alexandra Coelho ,&nbsp;María Nieves Pérez-Marfil ,&nbsp;Francisco Cruz-Quintana ,&nbsp;Dulce Camacho ,&nbsp;Adrián Montesano del Campo ,&nbsp;María José Cabañero-Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtd.2023.100373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span>The experience of grief and loss involves a variety of trajectories and responses, including feelings of shock or disbelief, somatic symptoms, longing for the loved one and avoidance behaviours, as well as positive reactions such as post-traumatic growth or meaning-making. Despite the large number of </span>psychometric instruments available for assessing the pathological dimensions of grief, few tools address the different responses to bereavement.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this research was to develop and test the psychometric properties (factorial structure, reliability and validity) of an instrument based on the Integrative-Relational Model of grief and designed to address the grief responses (the Grief Response Scale (GRS)) in a clinical sample of participants who had experienced bereavement.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>In total, 379 participants were recruited from different clinics in Spain. Each participant completed a self-report questionnaire including the GRS and measures of complicated grief, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety and post-traumatic growth. Twenty-eight clinical psychologists contacted each of the participants individually in order to carry out the assessment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Exploratory factor and item analysis yielded a six-factor solution for the GRS, including symptomatological distress, avoidance orientation, loss orientation, positive changes, loss integration and social support. Reliability values ranged from ω =0.88 for the symptomatological distress subscale to ω= 0.65 for the loss orientation subscale. We assessed validity evidence using Pearson's correlations, which showed significant positive and negative associations depending on the subscale. we also found statistically significant differences between participants who met the criteria for complicated grief (ICG≥30) and those who did not.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The GRS appears to be a suitable tool for assessing the range of grief responses in a clinical population. It can measure both complicated and pathological reactions to grief, as well as positive outcomes. The GRS may also be useful for clinicians working with bereavement and end-of-life situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468749923000613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The experience of grief and loss involves a variety of trajectories and responses, including feelings of shock or disbelief, somatic symptoms, longing for the loved one and avoidance behaviours, as well as positive reactions such as post-traumatic growth or meaning-making. Despite the large number of psychometric instruments available for assessing the pathological dimensions of grief, few tools address the different responses to bereavement.

Objective

The aim of this research was to develop and test the psychometric properties (factorial structure, reliability and validity) of an instrument based on the Integrative-Relational Model of grief and designed to address the grief responses (the Grief Response Scale (GRS)) in a clinical sample of participants who had experienced bereavement.

Method

In total, 379 participants were recruited from different clinics in Spain. Each participant completed a self-report questionnaire including the GRS and measures of complicated grief, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety and post-traumatic growth. Twenty-eight clinical psychologists contacted each of the participants individually in order to carry out the assessment.

Results

Exploratory factor and item analysis yielded a six-factor solution for the GRS, including symptomatological distress, avoidance orientation, loss orientation, positive changes, loss integration and social support. Reliability values ranged from ω =0.88 for the symptomatological distress subscale to ω= 0.65 for the loss orientation subscale. We assessed validity evidence using Pearson's correlations, which showed significant positive and negative associations depending on the subscale. we also found statistically significant differences between participants who met the criteria for complicated grief (ICG≥30) and those who did not.

Discussion

The GRS appears to be a suitable tool for assessing the range of grief responses in a clinical population. It can measure both complicated and pathological reactions to grief, as well as positive outcomes. The GRS may also be useful for clinicians working with bereavement and end-of-life situations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
悲伤反应量表(GRS):在丧亲人群样本中开发并初步验证基于综合关系模型的新工具
悲伤和失去亲人的经历涉及各种各样的轨迹和反应,包括震惊或难以置信的感觉、躯体症状、对所爱之人的渴望和回避行为,以及积极的反应,如创伤后成长或意义创造。尽管有大量的心理测量工具可用于评估悲伤的病理维度,但很少有工具能解决丧亲之痛的不同反应。目的:本研究的目的是开发和测试一种基于悲伤整合关系模型的工具(悲伤反应量表(GRS))的心理测量特性(析因结构、信度和效度),该工具旨在解决经历过丧亲之痛的临床样本中的悲伤反应。方法共从西班牙不同诊所招募379名参与者。每个参与者都完成了一份自我报告问卷,包括GRS和复杂悲伤、创伤后应激障碍、抑郁、焦虑和创伤后成长的测量。为了进行评估,28位临床心理学家分别联系了每一位参与者。结果通过探索性因素和项目分析,得出症状困扰、回避倾向、失落倾向、积极改变、失落整合和社会支持等6个因素对GRS的影响。信度值范围从症状窘迫分量表的ω= 0.88到损失取向分量表的ω= 0.65。我们使用Pearson相关性评估有效性证据,根据子量表显示显著的正相关和负相关。我们还发现,符合复杂悲伤标准(ICG≥30)和不符合标准的参与者之间存在统计学上的显著差异。讨论在临床人群中,GRS似乎是评估悲伤反应范围的合适工具。它既可以衡量对悲伤的复杂和病理反应,也可以衡量积极的结果。GRS对于处理丧亲之痛和生命终结情况的临床医生也很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories for Complex PTSD – A pilot quasi-experimental study from a wellness centre in India Adverse childhood experiences and dissociation among Italian public psychology service users Résistance et trauma: introduire l'existence Exploring the interplay between dreams, Early Maladaptive Schemas and demanding parenting style in Malaysia: A qualitative study Parent-Child EMDR therapy for children aged 0–4 years: Protocol, pilot-data, and case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1