How co-design can localize development programmes and reduce dependency: Examples from Pacific Island Countries

IF 2 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Development Policy Review Pub Date : 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1111/dpr.12763
Artila Devi
{"title":"How co-design can localize development programmes and reduce dependency: Examples from Pacific Island Countries","authors":"Artila Devi","doi":"10.1111/dpr.12763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>International donors commit around USD 2 billion every year to Pacific Island Countries (PICs). While the donors intend to help develop the Pacific, few of the projects they fund involve any more local involvement in their selection and planning beyond consultation with selected, often elite, or small groups of locals. It is even rarer to find projects that are localized or locally-led.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>We ask whether it is possible to do more to localize donor-funded development in the Pacific. We ask if co-design between foreign and local specialists can localize development, by giving locals more agency, and by prioritizing indigenous knowledge.</p>\n \n <p>Specifically, we review the Pacific eLearning Programme (PeP), funded by New Zealand and implemented in the Cook Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. The programme works with Ministries of Education to design science content that reflects the country context for some ten or so schools in each nation. Co-design includes use of indigenous dialogue [talanoa / tok stori / storian] to share, debate and learn between foreign and local specialists, and between specialists across the four countries.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and approach</h3>\n \n <p>Evidence was gathered from pre- and post-programme surveys. Further data was collected from comments written by the local co-designers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Finding<b>s</b></h3>\n \n <p>We found that kinship formed between locals and foreigners, based on mutual respect for the knowledge each group brought. This process empowered locals, valued their expertize and knowledge, and reduced dependency by prioritizing indigenous and local knowledge. Localization led to mutually beneficial outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy implications</h3>\n \n <p>Creation and implementation of policies that mandate localization through recruitment, use of indigenous methodologies, co-design and recognition of local skills, knowledge and culture will help create trust with development partners, empower locals, exchange skills and knowledge between locals and foreigners, and reduce dependency.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":"41 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.12763","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivation

International donors commit around USD 2 billion every year to Pacific Island Countries (PICs). While the donors intend to help develop the Pacific, few of the projects they fund involve any more local involvement in their selection and planning beyond consultation with selected, often elite, or small groups of locals. It is even rarer to find projects that are localized or locally-led.

Purpose

We ask whether it is possible to do more to localize donor-funded development in the Pacific. We ask if co-design between foreign and local specialists can localize development, by giving locals more agency, and by prioritizing indigenous knowledge.

Specifically, we review the Pacific eLearning Programme (PeP), funded by New Zealand and implemented in the Cook Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. The programme works with Ministries of Education to design science content that reflects the country context for some ten or so schools in each nation. Co-design includes use of indigenous dialogue [talanoa / tok stori / storian] to share, debate and learn between foreign and local specialists, and between specialists across the four countries.

Methods and approach

Evidence was gathered from pre- and post-programme surveys. Further data was collected from comments written by the local co-designers.

Findings

We found that kinship formed between locals and foreigners, based on mutual respect for the knowledge each group brought. This process empowered locals, valued their expertize and knowledge, and reduced dependency by prioritizing indigenous and local knowledge. Localization led to mutually beneficial outcomes.

Policy implications

Creation and implementation of policies that mandate localization through recruitment, use of indigenous methodologies, co-design and recognition of local skills, knowledge and culture will help create trust with development partners, empower locals, exchange skills and knowledge between locals and foreigners, and reduce dependency.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同设计如何使发展计划本地化并减少依赖性:太平洋岛国的实例
国际捐助方每年向太平洋岛国承诺约20亿美元。尽管捐助国有意帮助太平洋地区的发展,但在它们资助的项目中,除了与选定的(通常是精英)或当地小团体协商之外,很少有地方更多地参与项目的选择和规划。本地化或由当地领导的项目就更罕见了。我们问是否有可能在太平洋地区作出更多努力使捐助者资助的发展本地化。我们的问题是,外国和当地专家之间的共同设计是否可以通过给予当地人更多的代理,并优先考虑本土知识,使发展本地化。具体来说,我们回顾了由新西兰资助并在库克群岛、萨摩亚、所罗门群岛和瓦努阿图实施的太平洋电子学习计划(PeP)。该项目与教育部合作,为每个国家的大约10所学校设计反映国家背景的科学内容。共同设计包括使用土著对话[talanoa / tok story / storian]在外国和本地专家之间以及四个国家的专家之间进行分享、辩论和学习。方法和途径从规划前后的调查中收集证据。进一步的数据收集自当地共同设计师所写的评论。我们发现,当地人和外国人之间形成了亲属关系,这是基于对各自群体带来的知识的相互尊重。这个过程赋予了当地人权力,重视他们的专业知识和知识,并通过优先考虑土著和当地知识来减少对他们的依赖。本土化带来了互利共赢的结果。制定和实施通过招聘、使用本土方法、共同设计和认可当地技能、知识和文化来强制本地化的政策,将有助于与发展伙伴建立信任,赋予当地人权力,在当地人和外国人之间交流技能和知识,并减少依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
期刊最新文献
“Magic concepts” and USAID: Framing food systems reform to support the status quo Value for money in humanitarian assistance: How does cost efficiency vary across cash and voucher programmes? Changes in population literacy and numeracy in Ghana after three decades of free basic education Supporting farmers dealing with climate change: The impact of Participatory Integrated Climate Services for Agriculture (PICSA) on smallholder lead farmers in Malawi Why do governments fund some humanitarian appeals but not others?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1