Foundations of Preemptive Compassion: A Behavioral Concept Analysis of Compulsion, Consent, and Assent

IF 2.1 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavior Analysis in Practice Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1007/s40617-023-00890-1
Anna M. Linnehan, Awab Abdel-Jalil, Sheila Klick, Jonathan Amey, Richele Yeich, Kyle Hetzel
{"title":"Foundations of Preemptive Compassion: A Behavioral Concept Analysis of Compulsion, Consent, and Assent","authors":"Anna M. Linnehan, Awab Abdel-Jalil, Sheila Klick, Jonathan Amey, Richele Yeich, Kyle Hetzel","doi":"10.1007/s40617-023-00890-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The recent changes to the Behavior Analysis Certification Board <i>Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts</i> along with the calls to action for compassionate care have highlighted the need for a reevaluation of behavior research and clinical programs. We propose a behavior analytic definition of compassion where the relieving or prevention of distress is the reinforcer for the professional. One way of minimizing distress may be to require that assent be provided by a participant in an intervention. The definition of assent typically includes reference to willingness to participate in an intervention or activity. We provide a framework that goes beyond simple willingness to participate and distinguishes between apparent/implicit coercion and genuine assent by considering the alternatives described as degrees of freedom available to the participant. We distinguish between compulsion/explicit coercion, consent, and assent. Additionally, we will differentiate genuine consent and assent from apparent consent and assent in the design of compassionate behavioral programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47310,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Analysis in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00890-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recent changes to the Behavior Analysis Certification Board Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts along with the calls to action for compassionate care have highlighted the need for a reevaluation of behavior research and clinical programs. We propose a behavior analytic definition of compassion where the relieving or prevention of distress is the reinforcer for the professional. One way of minimizing distress may be to require that assent be provided by a participant in an intervention. The definition of assent typically includes reference to willingness to participate in an intervention or activity. We provide a framework that goes beyond simple willingness to participate and distinguishes between apparent/implicit coercion and genuine assent by considering the alternatives described as degrees of freedom available to the participant. We distinguish between compulsion/explicit coercion, consent, and assent. Additionally, we will differentiate genuine consent and assent from apparent consent and assent in the design of compassionate behavioral programs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先发同情的基础:强迫、同意和同意的行为概念分析
最近,行为分析认证委员会对《行为分析师职业道德规范》进行了修改,并呼吁人们采取行动,提供富有同情心的关怀,这凸显了对行为研究和临床项目进行重新评估的必要性。我们提出了 "同情 "的行为分析定义,即缓解或预防痛苦是专业人员的强化因素。最小化痛苦的方法之一可能是要求参与者在干预中表示同意。同意的定义通常包括参与干预或活动的意愿。我们提供了一个框架,它超越了简单的参与意愿,通过考虑作为参与者可用自由度的备选方案,将明显/隐含的强迫与真正的同意区分开来。我们将强迫/明示强迫、同意和同意区分开来。此外,在设计同情行为计划时,我们还将区分真正的同意和默许与表面的同意和默许。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Behavior Analysis in Practice PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
自引率
18.20%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Behavior Analysis in Practice, an official journal of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, is a peer-reviewed translational publication designed to provide science-based, best-practice information relevant to service delivery in behavior analysis. The target audience includes front-line service workers and their supervisors, scientist-practitioners, and school personnel. The mission of Behavior Analysis in Practice is to promote empirically validated best practices in an accessible format that describes not only what works, but also the challenges of implementation in practical settings. Types of articles and topics published  include empirical reports describing the application and evaluation of behavior-analytic procedures and programs; discussion papers on professional and practice issues; technical articles on methods, data analysis, or instrumentation in the practice of behavior analysis; tutorials on terms, procedures, and theories relevant to best practices in behavior analysis; and critical reviews of books and products that are aimed at practitioners or consumers of behavior analysis.
期刊最新文献
Facilitating Greater Understanding of Trauma-Informed Care in Applied Behavior Analysis: An Introduction to the Special Issue. The Effectiveness of Khan Academy in Teaching Elementary Math Procedural Integrity in Applied Settings: A Survey of Training, Practices, and Barriers Introducing "In Their Own Words" Special Series. Barriers to Careers in Behavior Analysis among Hispanic and Latinx Undergraduate Students: A Preliminary Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1