Advective gas flow in bentonite: Development and comparison of enhanced multi-phase numerical approaches

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment Pub Date : 2023-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.gete.2023.100528
E. Tamayo-Mas , J.F. Harrington , I.P. Damians , S. Olivella , E. Radeisen , J. Rutqvist , Y. Wang
{"title":"Advective gas flow in bentonite: Development and comparison of enhanced multi-phase numerical approaches","authors":"E. Tamayo-Mas ,&nbsp;J.F. Harrington ,&nbsp;I.P. Damians ,&nbsp;S. Olivella ,&nbsp;E. Radeisen ,&nbsp;J. Rutqvist ,&nbsp;Y. Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.gete.2023.100528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the impact of repository gas, generated from degradation of waste and its interaction with the host rock, is essential when assessing the performance and safety function of long-term disposal systems for radioactive waste. Numerical models based on conventional multi-phase flow theory have historically been applied to predict the outcome and impact of gas flow on different repository components. However, they remain unable to describe the full complexity of the physical processes observed in water-saturated experiments (e.g., creation of dilatant pathways) and thus, the development of novel representations for their description is required when assessing fully saturated clay-based systems. This was the primary focus of Task A within the international cooperative project DECOVALEX-2019 (D-2019) and refinement of these approaches is the primary focus of this study (Task B in the current phase of DECOVALEX-2023).</p><p>This paper summarises development of enhanced numerical representations of key processes and compares the performance of each model against high-quality laboratory test data. Experimental data reveals that gas percolation in water-saturated compacted bentonite is characterised by four key features: (i) a quiescence phase, followed by (ii) the gas breakthrough, which leads to a (iii) peak value, which is then followed by (iv) a negative decay. Three models based on the multiphase flow theory have been developed. These models can provide good initial values and reasonable responses for gas breakthrough (although some of them still predict a too-smooth response). Peak gas pressure values are in general reasonably well captured, although maximum radial stress differences are observed at 48 mm from the base of the sample. Here, numerical peak values of 12.8 MPa are predicted, whereas experimental values are about 11 MPa. These models are also capable of providing a reasonable representation of the negative pressure decay following peak pressure. However, other key specific features (such as the timing of gas breakthrough) still require a better representation. The model simulations and their comparison with experimental data show that these models need to be further improved with respect to model parameter calibration, the numerical representation of spatial heterogeneities in material properties and flow localisation, and the upscaling of the related physical processes and parameters. To further understand gas flow localisation, a new conceptual model has been developed, which shows that discrete channels can possibly be induced through the instability of gas-bentonite interface during gas injection, thus providing a new perspective for modeling gas percolation in low-permeability deformable media.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56008,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100528"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380823000977/pdfft?md5=f6f17782995b0f1cb2431eb6d09c9389&pid=1-s2.0-S2352380823000977-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352380823000977","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the impact of repository gas, generated from degradation of waste and its interaction with the host rock, is essential when assessing the performance and safety function of long-term disposal systems for radioactive waste. Numerical models based on conventional multi-phase flow theory have historically been applied to predict the outcome and impact of gas flow on different repository components. However, they remain unable to describe the full complexity of the physical processes observed in water-saturated experiments (e.g., creation of dilatant pathways) and thus, the development of novel representations for their description is required when assessing fully saturated clay-based systems. This was the primary focus of Task A within the international cooperative project DECOVALEX-2019 (D-2019) and refinement of these approaches is the primary focus of this study (Task B in the current phase of DECOVALEX-2023).

This paper summarises development of enhanced numerical representations of key processes and compares the performance of each model against high-quality laboratory test data. Experimental data reveals that gas percolation in water-saturated compacted bentonite is characterised by four key features: (i) a quiescence phase, followed by (ii) the gas breakthrough, which leads to a (iii) peak value, which is then followed by (iv) a negative decay. Three models based on the multiphase flow theory have been developed. These models can provide good initial values and reasonable responses for gas breakthrough (although some of them still predict a too-smooth response). Peak gas pressure values are in general reasonably well captured, although maximum radial stress differences are observed at 48 mm from the base of the sample. Here, numerical peak values of 12.8 MPa are predicted, whereas experimental values are about 11 MPa. These models are also capable of providing a reasonable representation of the negative pressure decay following peak pressure. However, other key specific features (such as the timing of gas breakthrough) still require a better representation. The model simulations and their comparison with experimental data show that these models need to be further improved with respect to model parameter calibration, the numerical representation of spatial heterogeneities in material properties and flow localisation, and the upscaling of the related physical processes and parameters. To further understand gas flow localisation, a new conceptual model has been developed, which shows that discrete channels can possibly be induced through the instability of gas-bentonite interface during gas injection, thus providing a new perspective for modeling gas percolation in low-permeability deformable media.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膨润土中的平流气体流动:增强型多相数值方法的开发与比较
在评估放射性废物长期处置系统的性能和安全功能时,了解废物降解产生的处置库气体及其与主岩相互作用的影响至关重要。基于传统多相流理论的数值模型历来被用于预测气体流动对不同处置库组成部分的结果和影响。然而,这些模型仍然无法描述在水饱和实验中观察到的物理过程的全部复杂性(例如,稀释途径的产生),因此,在评估完全饱和的粘土基系统时,需要开发新的描述方法。这是国际合作项目 DECOVALEX-2019 (D-2019)中任务 A 的主要重点,而完善这些方法则是本研究(DECOVALEX-2023 现阶段的任务 B)的主要重点。本文总结了关键过程的增强型数值表示方法的开发情况,并将每个模型的性能与高质量的实验室测试数据进行了比较。实验数据显示,气体在水饱和压实膨润土中的渗流有四个关键特征:(i)静止阶段,随后是(ii)气体突破,导致(iii)峰值,然后是(iv)负衰减。基于多相流理论开发了三种模型。这些模型可以为气体突破提供良好的初始值和合理的响应(尽管其中一些模型仍然预测了过于平滑的响应)。虽然在距离样品底部 48 毫米处观察到了最大径向应力差,但气体压力峰值总体上得到了合理的捕捉。此处预测的数值峰值为 12.8 兆帕,而实验值约为 11 兆帕。这些模型还能合理地表示峰值压力后的负压衰减。然而,其他关键的具体特征(如气体突破的时间)仍需要更好的表示。模型模拟及其与实验数据的比较表明,这些模型需要在模型参数校准、材料特性和气流定位的空间异质性的数值表示以及相关物理过程和参数的放大等方面进一步改进。为了进一步理解气流定位,我们建立了一个新的概念模型,该模型表明,在注入气体的过程中,气体-膨润土界面的不稳定性可能会诱发离散通道,从而为低渗透性可变形介质中的气体渗流建模提供了一个新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal is to publish research results of the highest quality and of lasting importance on the subject of geomechanics, with the focus on applications to geological energy production and storage, and the interaction of soils and rocks with the natural and engineered environment. Special attention is given to concepts and developments of new energy geotechnologies that comprise intrinsic mechanisms protecting the environment against a potential engineering induced damage, hence warranting sustainable usage of energy resources. The scope of the journal is broad, including fundamental concepts in geomechanics and mechanics of porous media, the experiments and analysis of novel phenomena and applications. Of special interest are issues resulting from coupling of particular physics, chemistry and biology of external forcings, as well as of pore fluid/gas and minerals to the solid mechanics of the medium skeleton and pore fluid mechanics. The multi-scale and inter-scale interactions between the phenomena and the behavior representations are also of particular interest. Contributions to general theoretical approach to these issues, but of potential reference to geomechanics in its context of energy and the environment are also most welcome.
期刊最新文献
Numerical modeling of hydro-mechanical processes during hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures at the Grimsel Test Site, Switzerland A finite discrete element approach for modeling of desiccation fracturing around underground openings in Opalinus clay Comparison between new enhanced thermal response test methods for underground heat exchanger sizing Early and post-stage piping erosion in bentonite buffer materials exposed to groundwater inflow Dam impoundment near active faults in areas with high seismic potential: Case studies from Bisri and Mseilha dams, Lebanon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1