Anuradha Ravindra, D. B. Kulkarni, Ritu Sharma, V. Sathian, Probal Chaudhury
{"title":"International Equivalence of 60Co: Sir Measurements of BIPM Comparison","authors":"Anuradha Ravindra, D. B. Kulkarni, Ritu Sharma, V. Sathian, Probal Chaudhury","doi":"10.1007/s12647-023-00702-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concept of equivalence was formulated to harmonize the different standards developed and maintained by national metrology institutes (NMIs) worldwide. Equivalence of a NMI with other NMIs or designated institute (DIs) is realized through international comparisons. International comparisons ensure the consistency and accuracy of measurements of various radionuclides that are carried out in laboratories worldwide. Organizing key comparisons by CCRI(II) meeting the requirement of NMIs/DIs for various radionuclides is challenging and cumbersome. Consequently, Syst`eme International de R´ef´erence (SIR), a system that enables NMIs to compare measurements standards over a wide spectrum of radionuclides, was approved by Section II of Consultative Committee on Ionising Radiation (CCRI II). Under this SIR intercomparison programme, BARC standardized radioactive solution of <sup>60</sup>Co by the primary methods using the 4<i>π β</i>-<i>γ</i> coincidence systems which are indigenously developed and maintained at BARC. The degree of equivalence (D<sub>i</sub>) of BARC for <sup>60</sup>Co (BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Co-60) comparison is D<sub>i</sub> = − 13 ± 42 kBq at expanded uncertainty (<i>k</i> = 2). This comparison demonstrates the measurement equivalence for <sup>60</sup>Co, and inclusion of BARC equivalent activity in KCRV indicates the consistency of the measurements and the standards maintained at BARC. This paper describes the various methods used for standardizing <sup>60</sup>Co and the results of the comparison.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":689,"journal":{"name":"MAPAN","volume":"39 1","pages":"83 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAPAN","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12647-023-00702-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The concept of equivalence was formulated to harmonize the different standards developed and maintained by national metrology institutes (NMIs) worldwide. Equivalence of a NMI with other NMIs or designated institute (DIs) is realized through international comparisons. International comparisons ensure the consistency and accuracy of measurements of various radionuclides that are carried out in laboratories worldwide. Organizing key comparisons by CCRI(II) meeting the requirement of NMIs/DIs for various radionuclides is challenging and cumbersome. Consequently, Syst`eme International de R´ef´erence (SIR), a system that enables NMIs to compare measurements standards over a wide spectrum of radionuclides, was approved by Section II of Consultative Committee on Ionising Radiation (CCRI II). Under this SIR intercomparison programme, BARC standardized radioactive solution of 60Co by the primary methods using the 4π β-γ coincidence systems which are indigenously developed and maintained at BARC. The degree of equivalence (Di) of BARC for 60Co (BIPM.RI(II)-K1.Co-60) comparison is Di = − 13 ± 42 kBq at expanded uncertainty (k = 2). This comparison demonstrates the measurement equivalence for 60Co, and inclusion of BARC equivalent activity in KCRV indicates the consistency of the measurements and the standards maintained at BARC. This paper describes the various methods used for standardizing 60Co and the results of the comparison.
期刊介绍:
MAPAN-Journal Metrology Society of India is a quarterly publication. It is exclusively devoted to Metrology (Scientific, Industrial or Legal). It has been fulfilling an important need of Metrologists and particularly of quality practitioners by publishing exclusive articles on scientific, industrial and legal metrology.
The journal publishes research communication or technical articles of current interest in measurement science; original work, tutorial or survey papers in any metrology related area; reviews and analytical studies in metrology; case studies on reliability, uncertainty in measurements; and reports and results of intercomparison and proficiency testing.