Perception and acceptance of natural sweeteners in a plant-based cocoa-flavored ice cream: Difference between Danish and Brazilian consumers

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Sensory Studies Pub Date : 2023-12-12 DOI:10.1111/joss.12890
Risia C. C. Lacerda, Glenn H. Andersen, Jonas Yde Junge, Ulla Kidmose, Helena M. A. Bolini
{"title":"Perception and acceptance of natural sweeteners in a plant-based cocoa-flavored ice cream: Difference between Danish and Brazilian consumers","authors":"Risia C. C. Lacerda,&nbsp;Glenn H. Andersen,&nbsp;Jonas Yde Junge,&nbsp;Ulla Kidmose,&nbsp;Helena M. A. Bolini","doi":"10.1111/joss.12890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>This research investigated cross-cultural differences in acceptance of a plant-based cocoa-flavored ice cream iso-sweetened with different natural sweeteners among Danish and Brazilian consumers. Ideal sweetness, equi-sweetness, quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA), and consumer affective tests were carried out. Results were analyzed through ANOVA and Tukey's means test (<i>p</i> ≤ .05). For consumer tests, Danish consumers (<i>n</i> = 120) and Brazilian consumers (<i>n</i> = 120) evaluated seven samples of a plant-based cocoa-flavored ice cream iso-sweetened with sucrose, blends of sucrose and xylitol (25%, 50%, and 75%, respectively), stevia 95% rebaudioside A, stevia 60% rebaudioside A, and a blend of stevia and xylitol (50%). No significant difference in overall liking was found between the blends of sucrose and xylitol. Samples sweetened with stevia rebaudioside A 95% and 60%, and a blend of stevia rebaudioside A 95% with xylitol 50% were rejected by Danish consumers, whereas Brazilian consumers liked them a little better (5.08, 4.63, and 4.92, respectively), even though there was no significant difference among them (<i>p</i> &gt; .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\n \n <p>This study showed that it is possible to reduce sugar content and increase liking in this plant-based ice cream matrix by replacing sucrose with xylitol. This emphasizes that the replacement will work in some places, but in others, it will not make a difference in acceptance; thus, it is a win for the food industry. The results obtained from specific groups require further studies on applying them to different consumers. The differences and similarities in acceptance between Danish and Brazilian consumers for natural sweeteners-sweetened plant-based ice cream emphasize the importance of performing a consumer acceptance study with consumers to whom the products under study are intended.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.12890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigated cross-cultural differences in acceptance of a plant-based cocoa-flavored ice cream iso-sweetened with different natural sweeteners among Danish and Brazilian consumers. Ideal sweetness, equi-sweetness, quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA), and consumer affective tests were carried out. Results were analyzed through ANOVA and Tukey's means test (p ≤ .05). For consumer tests, Danish consumers (n = 120) and Brazilian consumers (n = 120) evaluated seven samples of a plant-based cocoa-flavored ice cream iso-sweetened with sucrose, blends of sucrose and xylitol (25%, 50%, and 75%, respectively), stevia 95% rebaudioside A, stevia 60% rebaudioside A, and a blend of stevia and xylitol (50%). No significant difference in overall liking was found between the blends of sucrose and xylitol. Samples sweetened with stevia rebaudioside A 95% and 60%, and a blend of stevia rebaudioside A 95% with xylitol 50% were rejected by Danish consumers, whereas Brazilian consumers liked them a little better (5.08, 4.63, and 4.92, respectively), even though there was no significant difference among them (p > .05).

Practical Applications

This study showed that it is possible to reduce sugar content and increase liking in this plant-based ice cream matrix by replacing sucrose with xylitol. This emphasizes that the replacement will work in some places, but in others, it will not make a difference in acceptance; thus, it is a win for the food industry. The results obtained from specific groups require further studies on applying them to different consumers. The differences and similarities in acceptance between Danish and Brazilian consumers for natural sweeteners-sweetened plant-based ice cream emphasize the importance of performing a consumer acceptance study with consumers to whom the products under study are intended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对植物可可味冰淇淋中天然甜味剂的认知和接受程度:丹麦和巴西消费者的差异
本研究调查了丹麦和巴西消费者对使用不同天然甜味剂的植物可可味等甜冰淇淋接受程度的跨文化差异。研究进行了理想甜度、等甜度、定量描述性分析(QDA)和消费者情感测试。结果通过方差分析和 Tukey 均值检验进行分析(p ≤ .05)。在消费者测试中,丹麦消费者(n = 120)和巴西消费者(n = 120)对七种样品进行了评价,这些样品分别是用蔗糖、蔗糖和木糖醇混合物(分别为 25%、50% 和 75%)、甜菊糖 95% 重保地苷 A、甜菊糖 60% 重保地苷 A 以及甜菊糖和木糖醇混合物(50%)制成的植物基可可味冰淇淋等甜味剂。蔗糖和木糖醇混合物的总体口味没有明显差异。丹麦消费者拒绝接受甜菊糖甙 A 含量为 95% 和 60% 的甜菊糖样品,以及甜菊糖甙 A 含量为 95% 和木糖醇含量为 50% 的混合甜菊糖样品,而巴西消费者则更喜欢这些样品(分别为 5.08、4.63 和 4.92),尽管它们之间没有显著差异(p >.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Correction to “How do consumers with different food neophobia levels react to health and environmental information? A case study on legume-based formulations” Rabitti, N. S., Appiani, M., Proserpio, C., Pagliarini, E., & Laureati, M. (2024). How do consumers with different food neophobia levels react to health and environmental information? A case study on legume-based formulations. Journal of Sensory Studies, 39(3), e12915. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12915 Displaying ingredients on healthy snack packaging: A study on visual attention, choice, and purchase intention Normative cortical activation patterns in children distinguishing one or two tactile sensory inputs points: An functional MRI study Pleasantness of fat flavor is decreased in young adults with high perceived stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1