An olfactory perceptual fingerprint in people with olfactory dysfunction due to COVID-19

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Chemical Senses Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1093/chemse/bjad050
Eva Drnovsek, Maria Rommel, Antonie Louise Bierling, Alexander Croy, Ilona Croy, Thomas Hummel
{"title":"An olfactory perceptual fingerprint in people with olfactory dysfunction due to COVID-19","authors":"Eva Drnovsek, Maria Rommel, Antonie Louise Bierling, Alexander Croy, Ilona Croy, Thomas Hummel","doi":"10.1093/chemse/bjad050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sense of smell is based on sensory detection of the molecule(s), which is then further perceptually interpreted. A possible measure of olfactory perception is an odor independent olfactory perceptual fingerprint (OPF) defined by Snitz et al. We aimed to investigate, whether OPF can distinguish patients with olfactory dysfunction due to COVID-19 from controls and which perceptual descriptors are important for that separation. Our study included 99 healthy controls and 41 patients. They rated ten odors using eight descriptors 'pleasant', 'intense', 'familiar', 'warm', 'cold', 'irritating', ‘edible', and ‘disgusting'. An unsupervised machine learning method, hierarchical cluster analysis, showed that OPF can distinguish patients from controls with accuracy of 83%, sensitivity of 51%, and specificity of 96%. Furthermore, a supervised machine learning method, random forest classifier, showed that OPF can distinguish patients and controls in the testing dataset with accuracy of 86%, sensitivity of 64%, and specificity of 96%. Principal component analysis and random forest classifier showed that familiarity and intensity were the key qualities to explain the variance of the data. In conclusion, people with COVID-related olfactory dysfunction have a fundamentally different olfactory perception.","PeriodicalId":9771,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Senses","volume":"264 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Senses","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjad050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sense of smell is based on sensory detection of the molecule(s), which is then further perceptually interpreted. A possible measure of olfactory perception is an odor independent olfactory perceptual fingerprint (OPF) defined by Snitz et al. We aimed to investigate, whether OPF can distinguish patients with olfactory dysfunction due to COVID-19 from controls and which perceptual descriptors are important for that separation. Our study included 99 healthy controls and 41 patients. They rated ten odors using eight descriptors 'pleasant', 'intense', 'familiar', 'warm', 'cold', 'irritating', ‘edible', and ‘disgusting'. An unsupervised machine learning method, hierarchical cluster analysis, showed that OPF can distinguish patients from controls with accuracy of 83%, sensitivity of 51%, and specificity of 96%. Furthermore, a supervised machine learning method, random forest classifier, showed that OPF can distinguish patients and controls in the testing dataset with accuracy of 86%, sensitivity of 64%, and specificity of 96%. Principal component analysis and random forest classifier showed that familiarity and intensity were the key qualities to explain the variance of the data. In conclusion, people with COVID-related olfactory dysfunction have a fundamentally different olfactory perception.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 导致的嗅觉功能障碍患者的嗅觉感知指纹
嗅觉是基于对分子的感官检测,然后对其进行进一步的感知解释。嗅觉感知的一种可能的测量方法是 Snitz 等人定义的独立于气味的嗅觉感知指纹 (OPF)。我们的研究包括 99 名健康对照者和 41 名患者。他们使用 "令人愉快的"、"强烈的"、"熟悉的"、"温暖的"、"冰冷的"、"刺激的"、"可食用的 "和 "恶心的 "这八个描述词对十种气味进行评分。无监督机器学习方法--分层聚类分析显示,OPF 可以区分患者和对照组,准确率为 83%,灵敏度为 51%,特异性为 96%。此外,一种有监督的机器学习方法--随机森林分类器显示,OPF 可以区分测试数据集中的患者和对照组,准确率为 86%,灵敏度为 64%,特异性为 96%。主成分分析和随机森林分类器显示,熟悉度和强度是解释数据差异的关键特征。总之,COVID 相关嗅觉功能障碍患者的嗅觉感知与常人有本质区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chemical Senses
Chemical Senses 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
25
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Senses publishes original research and review papers on all aspects of chemoreception in both humans and animals. An important part of the journal''s coverage is devoted to techniques and the development and application of new methods for investigating chemoreception and chemosensory structures.
期刊最新文献
A receptor-based assay to study the sweet and bitter tastes of sweeteners and binary sweet blends: The SWEET Project. Late olfactory bulb involvement in COVID19. Taste And Odor Interactions After Metabolic Surgery Novel Gurmarin-like Peptides from Gymnema sylvestre and their Interactions with the Sweet Taste Receptor T1R2/T1R3 How conspecific and allospecific eggs and larvae drive oviposition preference in Drosophila
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1