Trainees as primary operators do not significantly impact perioperative complication rates in breast surgery

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2023.11.008
Linda Vu , Chaithanya Jeganathan , Kallyani Ponniah , Adam Ofri
{"title":"Trainees as primary operators do not significantly impact perioperative complication rates in breast surgery","authors":"Linda Vu ,&nbsp;Chaithanya Jeganathan ,&nbsp;Kallyani Ponniah ,&nbsp;Adam Ofri","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2023.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is a trend for specialist care in breast surgery resulting in fewer primary operative cases for general surgery trainees; and subsequently that trainees performing advanced oncoplastic techniques in breast surgery may negatively impact patient morbidity. We have reviewed the complication rates between Australian general surgery trainees and Breast Consultants.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis was performed over a 5-year period (January 2016–December 2021). The key endpoints measured were relative complication rates for consultants compared to trainees, subdivided by surgery type. Surgeries were categorised as either benign, primary breast cancer surgery or re-excision.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2646 operative cases were performed with the primary operator rate for consultants 58.35 % (n = 1544) and for trainees 41.65 %% (n = 1102). The overall complication rate was 2.83 % (n = 75); the overall rate for the consultants was 2.65 % and 3.08 % for the trainees. The complication rates were not statistically significant (p = 0.59) between the two groups. The mastectomy only complication rate was higher in the consultant group with a result of 7.3 % compared to 2.8 % for the trainees however was not statistically significant (p = 0.18). The most common complication was haematoma formation for both groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study has demonstrated that trainees can safely perform advanced oncoplastic techniques without statistically elevated morbidity. In an era where breast surgery caseloads are increasing, but the exposure to breast surgery during training are decreasing, it is necessary to implement a practice where trainees can perform breast operations under supervision at a specialized unit.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X23001427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is a trend for specialist care in breast surgery resulting in fewer primary operative cases for general surgery trainees; and subsequently that trainees performing advanced oncoplastic techniques in breast surgery may negatively impact patient morbidity. We have reviewed the complication rates between Australian general surgery trainees and Breast Consultants.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed over a 5-year period (January 2016–December 2021). The key endpoints measured were relative complication rates for consultants compared to trainees, subdivided by surgery type. Surgeries were categorised as either benign, primary breast cancer surgery or re-excision.

Results

A total of 2646 operative cases were performed with the primary operator rate for consultants 58.35 % (n = 1544) and for trainees 41.65 %% (n = 1102). The overall complication rate was 2.83 % (n = 75); the overall rate for the consultants was 2.65 % and 3.08 % for the trainees. The complication rates were not statistically significant (p = 0.59) between the two groups. The mastectomy only complication rate was higher in the consultant group with a result of 7.3 % compared to 2.8 % for the trainees however was not statistically significant (p = 0.18). The most common complication was haematoma formation for both groups.

Conclusions

This study has demonstrated that trainees can safely perform advanced oncoplastic techniques without statistically elevated morbidity. In an era where breast surgery caseloads are increasing, but the exposure to breast surgery during training are decreasing, it is necessary to implement a practice where trainees can perform breast operations under supervision at a specialized unit.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
受训人员作为主要操作人员对乳腺手术围手术期并发症发生率的影响不大
背景乳腺外科专科护理是一种趋势,这导致普外科受训人员的初级手术病例减少;随后,在乳腺手术中执行高级肿瘤整形技术的受训人员可能会对患者的发病率产生负面影响。我们对澳大利亚普外科受训人员和乳腺顾问之间的并发症发生率进行了回顾性分析,分析时间跨度为 5 年(2016 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月)。测量的关键终点是顾问与受训人员相比的相对并发症发生率,并按手术类型进行细分。手术分为良性手术、原发性乳腺癌手术或再次切除手术。结果 共进行了 2646 例手术,顾问的主要手术率为 58.35 %(n = 1544),受训人员为 41.65 %(n = 1102)。总并发症发生率为 2.83 %(n = 75);顾问的总并发症发生率为 2.65 %,受训人员为 3.08 %。两组之间的并发症发生率没有统计学意义(P = 0.59)。顾问组的乳房切除术并发症发生率较高,为 7.3%,而受训者为 2.8%,但无统计学意义(P = 0.18)。结论这项研究表明,学员可以安全地实施先进的肿瘤整形技术,而不会出现统计学意义上的高发病率。在乳腺外科手术量不断增加,但培训期间接触乳腺外科手术的机会却不断减少的时代,有必要实施一种做法,让受训者在专业单位的指导下进行乳腺手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1