Effects of erosion and abrasion on resin-matrix ceramic CAD/CAM materials: An in vitro investigation

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Oral Sciences Pub Date : 2023-12-17 DOI:10.1111/eos.12967
Cosima Reidelbach, Michael Swoboda, Mathias Spraul, Kirstin Vach, Sebastian B. M. Patzelt, Elmar Hellwig, Olga Polydorou
{"title":"Effects of erosion and abrasion on resin-matrix ceramic CAD/CAM materials: An in vitro investigation","authors":"Cosima Reidelbach,&nbsp;Michael Swoboda,&nbsp;Mathias Spraul,&nbsp;Kirstin Vach,&nbsp;Sebastian B. M. Patzelt,&nbsp;Elmar Hellwig,&nbsp;Olga Polydorou","doi":"10.1111/eos.12967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of erosion and abrasion on resin-matrix ceramic CAD/CAM materials [CERASMART (GC); VITA ENAMIC (VITA Zahnfabrik); Lava Ultimate (3 M)] in comparison to feldspar ceramic (VITABLOCS Mark II, VITA Zahnfabrik) and resin composite materials (ceram.x universal, Dentsply Sirona). Daily brushing and acid exposure were simulated using a brushing apparatus and a solution of 0.5 vol% citric acid. Microhardness, surface roughness, and substance loss were measured at baseline and after simulation of 1 and 3 years of function. All materials showed a decrease in microhardness after 3 years and an increase in surface roughness (Ra) after 1 and 3 years. The Ra increase was statistically significantly lower for the resin-matrix ceramics than for feldspar ceramic and similar to composite material. After 3 years, only feldspar ceramic showed no significant substance loss. In conclusion, resin-matrix ceramics demonstrate reduced roughening compared to feldspar ceramics, potentially improving restoration longevity by preventing plaque buildup, but differences in abrasion resistance suggest the need for further material-specific research. Future research should aim to replicate clinical conditions closely and to transition to in vivo trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eos.12967","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.12967","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of erosion and abrasion on resin-matrix ceramic CAD/CAM materials [CERASMART (GC); VITA ENAMIC (VITA Zahnfabrik); Lava Ultimate (3 M)] in comparison to feldspar ceramic (VITABLOCS Mark II, VITA Zahnfabrik) and resin composite materials (ceram.x universal, Dentsply Sirona). Daily brushing and acid exposure were simulated using a brushing apparatus and a solution of 0.5 vol% citric acid. Microhardness, surface roughness, and substance loss were measured at baseline and after simulation of 1 and 3 years of function. All materials showed a decrease in microhardness after 3 years and an increase in surface roughness (Ra) after 1 and 3 years. The Ra increase was statistically significantly lower for the resin-matrix ceramics than for feldspar ceramic and similar to composite material. After 3 years, only feldspar ceramic showed no significant substance loss. In conclusion, resin-matrix ceramics demonstrate reduced roughening compared to feldspar ceramics, potentially improving restoration longevity by preventing plaque buildup, but differences in abrasion resistance suggest the need for further material-specific research. Future research should aim to replicate clinical conditions closely and to transition to in vivo trials.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
侵蚀和磨损对树脂基质陶瓷 CAD/CAM 材料的影响:体外研究
该研究旨在评估树脂基质陶瓷 CAD/CAM 材料 [CERASMART (GC);VITA ENAMIC (VITA Zahnfabrik);Lava Ultimate (3 M)]与长石陶瓷(VITABLOCS Mark II,VITA Zahnfabrik)和树脂复合材料(ceram.x universal,Dentsply Sirona)相比,受到侵蚀和磨损的影响。使用刷牙器和 0.5 Vol% 的柠檬酸溶液模拟日常刷牙和酸暴露。在基线和模拟 1 年和 3 年的功能后,对微观硬度、表面粗糙度和物质流失进行了测量。所有材料的显微硬度在 3 年后都有所下降,表面粗糙度(Ra)在 1 年和 3 年后都有所上升。据统计,树脂基质陶瓷的 Ra 增幅明显低于长石陶瓷,与复合材料相似。3 年后,只有长石陶瓷没有出现明显的物质损失。总之,与长石陶瓷相比,树脂基质陶瓷的粗糙度较低,可以通过防止牙菌斑堆积来延长修复体的寿命,但耐磨性方面的差异表明需要进一步开展针对特定材料的研究。未来的研究应以密切复制临床条件为目标,并过渡到体内试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
期刊最新文献
Bond strength of resin-based restorative materials to fast-setting calcium silicate cement using different resin adhesive systems. Different adhesive approaches for the bonding of a new universal resin cement to a disilicate glass-ceramic. Psychological resilience in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome: effect of involvement of major salivary and lacrimal glands. Effect of propolis added to single-bottle adhesives on water permeation through the hybrid layer. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the impact of access cavity preparation on first molar fracture resistance: A scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1