Marine Protected Area Expansion and Country-Level Age-Standardized Adult Mortality

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ecohealth Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1007/s10393-023-01658-3
Sabrina S. Haque, Baylin J. Bennett, Thomas D. Brewer, Karyn Morrissey, Lora E. Fleming, Matthew O. Gribble
{"title":"Marine Protected Area Expansion and Country-Level Age-Standardized Adult Mortality","authors":"Sabrina S. Haque, Baylin J. Bennett, Thomas D. Brewer, Karyn Morrissey, Lora E. Fleming, Matthew O. Gribble","doi":"10.1007/s10393-023-01658-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many countries have adopted targets to increase marine protected areas (MPAs) to limit the degradation of water bodies. Although there is evidence that MPAs can conserve marine life and promote biodiversity, there are limited data on the human health implications of MPAs. Using panel data from 1990, 2000, and 2014, we estimated the country-level associations between MPAs (i.e., percentage of territorial waters designated as marine reserves) and age-standardized mortality (i.e., age-standardized probability of dying between 15 and 60 years from all-causes among ages 15–60/100,000 population) by sex, among 110 countries. We fit mixed-effects linear regression models of mortality as a function of current MPA coverage, gross domestic product growth, year, the prior extent of MPA, electricity coverage, governance, and country-level random effects. We observed a significant inverse association between current MPA coverage and adult mortality. For each 5-percentage-point increase in current MPA coverage, a country had 0.982 times the geometric means of female and male mortality [geometric mean ratio: 0.982 (95% CI 0·976, 0·988)] conditional on past %MPA coverage and other modeled variables. The model showed no significant residual association of mortality with past %MPA conditional on current %MPA and other modeled variables. This is one of the first studies to show a positive association between increasing marine conservation and human health. This macro-level study suggests there may be important co-benefits for human health from expanding MPAs that merit further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51027,"journal":{"name":"Ecohealth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecohealth","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-023-01658-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many countries have adopted targets to increase marine protected areas (MPAs) to limit the degradation of water bodies. Although there is evidence that MPAs can conserve marine life and promote biodiversity, there are limited data on the human health implications of MPAs. Using panel data from 1990, 2000, and 2014, we estimated the country-level associations between MPAs (i.e., percentage of territorial waters designated as marine reserves) and age-standardized mortality (i.e., age-standardized probability of dying between 15 and 60 years from all-causes among ages 15–60/100,000 population) by sex, among 110 countries. We fit mixed-effects linear regression models of mortality as a function of current MPA coverage, gross domestic product growth, year, the prior extent of MPA, electricity coverage, governance, and country-level random effects. We observed a significant inverse association between current MPA coverage and adult mortality. For each 5-percentage-point increase in current MPA coverage, a country had 0.982 times the geometric means of female and male mortality [geometric mean ratio: 0.982 (95% CI 0·976, 0·988)] conditional on past %MPA coverage and other modeled variables. The model showed no significant residual association of mortality with past %MPA conditional on current %MPA and other modeled variables. This is one of the first studies to show a positive association between increasing marine conservation and human health. This macro-level study suggests there may be important co-benefits for human health from expanding MPAs that merit further investigation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
海洋保护区扩张与国家级年龄标准化成人死亡率
许多国家都制定了增加海洋保护区 (MPA) 的目标,以限制水体退化。虽然有证据表明海洋保护区可以保护海洋生物和促进生物多样性,但有关海洋保护区对人类健康影响的数据却很有限。利用 1990 年、2000 年和 2014 年的面板数据,我们按性别估算了 110 个国家的 MPA(即指定为海洋保护区的领海百分比)与年龄标准化死亡率(即 15-60 岁人口中 15-60 岁因各种原因死亡的年龄标准化概率/100,000 人口)之间的国家级关联。我们建立了死亡率与当前 MPA 覆盖率、国内生产总值增长率、年份、MPA 先前覆盖率、电力覆盖率、治理和国家级随机效应函数的混合效应线性回归模型。我们发现,目前的海洋保护区覆盖率与成人死亡率之间存在明显的反比关系。当前海洋保护区覆盖率每增加 5 个百分点,在过去海洋保护区覆盖率百分比和其他建模变量的条件下,一个国家的女性和男性死亡率的几何平均比为 0.982 倍[几何平均比:0.982 (95% CI 0-976, 0-988)]。该模型显示,在目前的甲基丙烯酸甲酯覆盖率和其他建模变量的条件下,死亡率与过去的甲基丙烯酸甲酯覆盖率没有明显的残差关系。这是首批显示海洋保护的增加与人类健康之间存在正相关关系的研究之一。这项宏观研究表明,扩大海洋保护区可能会给人类健康带来重要的共同利益,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecohealth
Ecohealth 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: EcoHealth aims to advance research, practice, and knowledge integration at the interface of ecology and health by publishing high quality research and review articles that address and profile new ideas, developments, and programs. The journal’s scope encompasses research that integrates concepts and theory from many fields of scholarship (including ecological, social and health sciences, and the humanities) and draws upon multiple types of knowledge, including those of relevance to practice and policy. Papers address integrated ecology and health challenges arising in public health, human and veterinary medicine, conservation and ecosystem management, rural and urban development and planning, and other fields that address the social-ecological context of health. The journal is a central platform for fulfilling the mission of the EcoHealth Alliance to strive for sustainable health of people, domestic animals, wildlife, and ecosystems by promoting discovery, understanding, and transdisciplinarity. The journal invites substantial contributions in the following areas: One Health and Conservation Medicine o Integrated research on health of humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Research and policy in ecology, public health, and agricultural sustainability o Emerging infectious diseases affecting people, wildlife, domestic animals, and plants o Research and practice linking human and animal health and/or social-ecological systems o Anthropogenic environmental change and drivers of disease emergence in humans, wildlife, livestock and ecosystems o Health of humans and animals in relation to terrestrial, freshwater, and marine ecosystems Ecosystem Approaches to Health o Systems thinking and social-ecological systems in relation to health o Transdiiplinary approaches to health, ecosystems and society.
期刊最新文献
Spatial examination of social and environmental drivers of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) across Kenya. Evaluating the Risk Landscape of Hawaiian Monk Seal Exposure to Toxoplasma gondii. Large-Scale Serological Survey of Influenza A Virus in South Korean Wild Boar (Sus scrofa). An Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in Captive Armadillos Associated with Gamma Variant in Argentina. Pastoralism and Resulting Challenges for National Parks in Afar, Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1